Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

An empty swimming pool with a capacity of 75,000 liters is [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Apr 2012, 15:06

5

This post received KUDOS

9

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

68% (02:10) correct
32% (01:23) wrong based on 847 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

An empty swimming pool with a capacity of 75,000 liters is to be filled by hoses X and Y simultaneously. If the amount of water flowing from each hose is independent of the amount flowing from the other hose, how long, in hours, will it take to fi ll the pool?

(1) If hose X stopped fi lling the pool after hoses X and Y had filled half the pool, it would take 21 hours to fi ll the pool. (2) If hose Y stopped fi lling the pool after hoses X and Y had filled half the pool, it would take 16 hours to fi ll the pool.

An empty swimming pool with a capacity of 75,000 liters is to be filled by hoses X and Y simultaneously. If the amount of water flowing from each hose is independent of the amount flowing from the other hose, how long, in hours, will it take to fi ll the pool?

(1) If hose X stopped fi lling the pool after hoses X and Y had filled half the pool, it would take 21 hours to fi ll the pool. After hose X stops, hose Y continues filling the remaining half of the pool alone, and we are told that it needs 21 hours for that, hence to fill the whole pool it needs 21*2=42 hours. We know the rate of Y, though know nothing about the rate of X. Not sufficient.

(2) If hose Y stopped fi lling the pool after hoses X and Y had filled half the pool, it would take 16 hours to fi ll the pool. Reverse case: after hose Y stops, hose X continues filling the remaining half of the pool alone, and we are told that it needs 16 hours for that, hence to fill the whole pool it needs 16*2=32 hours. We know the rate of X, though know nothing about the rate of Y. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) We know the rates of both hose X and Y, hence we can calculate the time they'll need to fi ll the pool of 75,000 liters. Sufficient.

Re: An empty swimming pool with a capacity of 75,000 liters is [#permalink]

Show Tags

31 May 2013, 07:55

I was a bit confused with this question. My interpretation of the time to fill to pool was that it was the total time. So the time would include the time taken for X and Y to fill the pool to half plus the time for Y (orX) to fill the other half.

I was a bit confused with this question. My interpretation of the time to fill to pool was that it was the total time. So the time would include the time taken for X and Y to fill the pool to half plus the time for Y (orX) to fill the other half.

Timica

Consider this: the pool is to be filled by hoses X and Y simultaneously. The question is: how long, in hours, will it take to fill the pool?
_________________

Re: An empty swimming pool with a capacity of 75,000 liters is [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Sep 2013, 12:16

Hi ! I know I am way past the time for this thread but I'll still give my thoughts for someone coming here in the future!

I find DS questions easier to comprehend once I write down the data in a form of equation (s). IN the given questions, lets take the respective rates of hoses X & Y to be r_x & r_y and the total time to be 't'. We need to find 't' , where t=75000/(r_x + r_y)

Once we write down the above equation, it becomes very clear that we need to find r_x & r_y together to be able to find 't'. Hence, we need both statements (1) & (2) together to solve the above. Hence, option C.

Thank you again for this awesome series brunel! I'll be looking forward to all the other juicy questions coming up!!
_________________

Re: An empty swimming pool with a capacity of 75,000 liters is [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Sep 2013, 09:23

1

This post received KUDOS

Bunuel wrote:

timica wrote:

I was a bit confused with this question. My interpretation of the time to fill to pool was that it was the total time. So the time would include the time taken for X and Y to fill the pool to half plus the time for Y (orX) to fill the other half.

Timica

Consider this: the pool is to be filled by hoses X and Y simultaneously. The question is: how long, in hours, will it take to fill the pool?

Hi Bunuel! I too thought that 21 and 16 are total time and therefore wrote my equations as:- 1. 21 = [75k/2(x+y)] + [75k/2y] 2. 16 = [75k/2(x+y)] + [75k/2x] k=1000, x = X's rate and y = Y's rate. This way too C will be the answer.

An empty swimming pool with a capacity of 75,000 liters is to be filled by hoses X and Y simultaneously. If the amount of water flowing from each hose is independent of the amount flowing from the other hose, how long, in hours, will it take to fi ll the pool?

(1) If hose X stopped fi lling the pool after hoses X and Y had filled half the pool, it would take 21 hours to fi ll the pool. After hose X stops, hose Y continues filling the remaining half of the pool alone, and we are told that it needs 21 hours for that, hence to fill the whole pool it needs 21*2=42 hours. We know the rate of Y, though know nothing about the rate of X. Not sufficient.

(2) If hose Y stopped fi lling the pool after hoses X and Y had filled half the pool, it would take 16 hours to fi ll the pool. Reverse case: after hose Y stops, hose X continues filling the remaining half of the pool alone, and we are told that it needs 16 hours for that, hence to fill the whole pool it needs 16*2=32 hours. We know the rate of X, though know nothing about the rate of Y. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) We know the rates of both hose X and Y, hence we can calculate the time they'll need to fi ll the pool of 75,000 liters. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Bunuel, how is the question blindly giving us the rates of Y and X respectively in 1 and 2?

I interpreted (1) to say the following t1/x + (1/y)*(t1+t2) = 1 t1 + t2 = 21 t1 = the time it takes both x and y to fill half of the pool t1/x + 21/y = 1

An empty swimming pool with a capacity of 75,000 liters is to be filled by hoses X and Y simultaneously. If the amount of water flowing from each hose is independent of the amount flowing from the other hose, how long, in hours, will it take to fi ll the pool?

(1) If hose X stopped fi lling the pool after hoses X and Y had filled half the pool, it would take 21 hours to fi ll the pool. After hose X stops, hose Y continues filling the remaining half of the pool alone, and we are told that it needs 21 hours for that, hence to fill the whole pool it needs 21*2=42 hours. We know the rate of Y, though know nothing about the rate of X. Not sufficient.

(2) If hose Y stopped fi lling the pool after hoses X and Y had filled half the pool, it would take 16 hours to fi ll the pool. Reverse case: after hose Y stops, hose X continues filling the remaining half of the pool alone, and we are told that it needs 16 hours for that, hence to fill the whole pool it needs 16*2=32 hours. We know the rate of X, though know nothing about the rate of Y. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) We know the rates of both hose X and Y, hence we can calculate the time they'll need to fi ll the pool of 75,000 liters. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Bunuel, how is the question blindly giving us the rates of Y and X respectively in 1 and 2?

I interpreted (1) to say the following t1/x + (1/y)*(t1+t2) = 1 t1 + t2 = 21 t1 = the time it takes both x and y to fill half of the pool t1/x + 21/y = 1

Can you show me where I went wrong?

It should be \(t_1(\frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{y}) + t_2(\frac{1}{y}) = 1\), where \(t_2=21\). We know that \(t_2(\frac{1}{y}) = \frac{1}{2}\), thus \(\frac{21}{y} = \frac{1}{2}\) --> \(y = 42\) hours.
_________________

Re: An empty swimming pool with a capacity of 75,000 liters is [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Aug 2014, 11:39

Bunuel wrote:

TooLong150 wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

An empty swimming pool with a capacity of 75,000 liters is to be filled by hoses X and Y simultaneously. If the amount of water flowing from each hose is independent of the amount flowing from the other hose, how long, in hours, will it take to fi ll the pool?

(1) If hose X stopped fi lling the pool after hoses X and Y had filled half the pool, it would take 21 hours to fi ll the pool. After hose X stops, hose Y continues filling the remaining half of the pool alone, and we are told that it needs 21 hours for that, hence to fill the whole pool it needs 21*2=42 hours. We know the rate of Y, though know nothing about the rate of X. Not sufficient.

(2) If hose Y stopped fi lling the pool after hoses X and Y had filled half the pool, it would take 16 hours to fi ll the pool. Reverse case: after hose Y stops, hose X continues filling the remaining half of the pool alone, and we are told that it needs 16 hours for that, hence to fill the whole pool it needs 16*2=32 hours. We know the rate of X, though know nothing about the rate of Y. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) We know the rates of both hose X and Y, hence we can calculate the time they'll need to fi ll the pool of 75,000 liters. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Bunuel, how is the question blindly giving us the rates of Y and X respectively in 1 and 2?

I interpreted (1) to say the following t1/x + (1/y)*(t1+t2) = 1 t1 + t2 = 21 t1 = the time it takes both x and y to fill half of the pool t1/x + 21/y = 1

Can you show me where I went wrong?

It should be \(t_1(\frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{y}) + t_2(\frac{1}{y}) = 1\), where \(t_2=21\). We know that \(t_2(\frac{1}{y}) = \frac{1}{2}\), thus \(\frac{21}{y} = \frac{1}{2}\) --> \(y = 42\) hours.

I think that they mean that \(t_1 + t_2 = 21\) and not \(t_2=21\)

Re: An empty swimming pool with a capacity of 75,000 liters is [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Aug 2014, 02:56

Bunuel wrote:

An empty swimming pool with a capacity of 75,000 liters is to be filled by hoses X and Y simultaneously. If the amount of water flowing from each hose is independent of the amount flowing from the other hose, how long, in hours, will it take to fi ll the pool?

(1) If hose X stopped fi lling the pool after hoses X and Y had filled half the pool, it would take 21 hours to fi ll the pool. After hose X stops, hose Y continues filling the remaining half of the pool alone, and we are told that it needs 21 hours for that, hence to fill the whole pool it needs 21*2=42 hours. We know the rate of Y, though know nothing about the rate of X. Not sufficient.

(2) If hose Y stopped fi lling the pool after hoses X and Y had filled half the pool, it would take 16 hours to fi ll the pool. Reverse case: after hose Y stops, hose X continues filling the remaining half of the pool alone, and we are told that it needs 16 hours for that, hence to fill the whole pool it needs 16*2=32 hours. We know the rate of X, though know nothing about the rate of Y. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) We know the rates of both hose X and Y, hence we can calculate the time they'll need to fi ll the pool of 75,000 liters. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

I answered it incorrectly. My thought was: We know that first half was filled by both X and Y. and Y filled for 21 hrs. So, 75000/2 ltr was filled by both in first half and Y filled for 21 hrs. (total 42 hrs) we can check that how much liters can X fill in the first half of the tank!!
_________________

KUDOS please!! If it helped. Warm Regards. Visit My Blog

My understanding of the question is similar to others who have posted.

Statement 1 states: (1) If hose X stopped fi lling the pool after hoses X and Y had filled half the pool, it would take 21 hours to fi ll the pool. Therefore: t1+t2 = 21 hours, t1= 32,500*[Rate(x) + Rate (y)], and t2 = 32,500 * [Rate(y)]

Same logic would apply for statement 2. Statement 2 states: (2) If hose Y stopped filling the pool after hoses X and Y had filled half the pool, it would take 16 hours to fi ll the pool.

Both statements clearly state that it would take their respective amount of times (21hrs and 16 hrs), if both hoses filled half the pool together, and then one hose continued the job alone to fill the other half of the pool.

My understanding of the question is similar to others who have posted.

Statement 1 states: (1) If hose X stopped fi lling the pool after hoses X and Y had filled half the pool, it would take 21 hours to fi ll the pool. Therefore: t1+t2 = 21 hours, t1= 32,500*[Rate(x) + Rate (y)], and t2 = 32,500 * [Rate(y)]

Same logic would apply for statement 2. Statement 2 states: (2) If hose Y stopped filling the pool after hoses X and Y had filled half the pool, it would take 16 hours to fi ll the pool.

Both statements clearly state that it would take their respective amount of times (21hrs and 16 hrs), if both hoses filled half the pool together, and then one hose continued the job alone to fill the other half of the pool.

Thanks.

Sorry, but I do not understand what you've written there. Generally time*rate = job done, not time = job*rate.

Notice also that we don't know how much time is needed for hoses X and Y to fill half the pool.
_________________

My understanding of the question is similar to others who have posted.

Statement 1 states: (1) If hose X stopped fi lling the pool after hoses X and Y had filled half the pool, it would take 21 hours to fi ll the pool. Therefore: t1+t2 = 21 hours, t1= 32,500*[Rate(x) + Rate (y)], and t2 = 32,500 * [Rate(y)]

Same logic would apply for statement 2. Statement 2 states: (2) If hose Y stopped filling the pool after hoses X and Y had filled half the pool, it would take 16 hours to fi ll the pool.

Both statements clearly state that it would take their respective amount of times (21hrs and 16 hrs), if both hoses filled half the pool together, and then one hose continued the job alone to fill the other half of the pool.

Thanks.

Sorry, but I do not understand what you've written there. Generally time*rate = job done, not time = job*rate.

Notice also that we don't know how much time is needed for hoses X and Y to fill half the pool.

So for statement (1): t1+t2 = 21 hours, t1= 32,500 / [Rate(x) + Rate (y)], and t2 = 32,500 / [Rate(Y)] And for statement (2): t1+t2 = 16 hours, t1= 32,500 / [Rate(x) + Rate (y)], and t2 = 32,500 / [Rate(X)]

Therefore, "21 hours" is the total time it takes to fill the pool if X&Y hoses work together for half the pool, and Y fills the remaining half of the pool. While in statement 2 it states "16 hours" is the total time it takes to fill the pool, if X&Y hoses work together to fill half the pool, and X fills the remaining half of the pool.

An empty swimming pool with a capacity of 75,000 liters is [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Aug 2016, 04:52

enigma123 wrote:

An empty swimming pool with a capacity of 75,000 liters is to be filled by hoses X and Y simultaneously. If the amount of water flowing from each hose is independent of the amount flowing from the other hose, how long, in hours, will it take to fi ll the pool?

(1) If hose X stopped fi lling the pool after hoses X and Y had filled half the pool, it would take 21 hours to fi ll the pool. (2) If hose Y stopped fi lling the pool after hoses X and Y had filled half the pool, it would take 16 hours to fi ll the pool.

Let rate of X hose be x and Y hose be y (1) If hose X stopped fi lling the pool after hoses X and Y had filled half the pool, it would take 21 hours to fi ll the pool. SO this tells us that Half pool is filled ; therefore we can assume that Y is only effectively doing only half work and taking 21 hours to do that half work y* 21= half of 75000 = 32500 y=32500/21 Now we know the rate of hose Y ; rate of hose X is missing INSUFFICIENT

(2) If hose Y stopped fi lling the pool after hoses X and Y had filled half the pool, it would take 16 hours to fi ll the pool. SO this tells us that Half pool is filled ; therefore we can assume that X is only effectively doing only half work and taking 16 hours to do that half work. x* 16= half of 75000=32500 y=32500/16 Now we know the rate of hose Y ; rate of hose X is missing INSUFFICIENT

Merge both now we know the combined rate of x and y ( x + y) * time = total work = 75000

Time = 75000/x+y Although x+y looks like a weird number but we know it is "32500/21 + 32500/16"

SUFFICIENT

ANSWER IS C
_________________

Posting an answer without an explanation is "GOD COMPLEX". The world doesn't need any more gods. Please explain you answers properly. FINAL GOODBYE :- 17th SEPTEMBER 2016.

gmatclubot

An empty swimming pool with a capacity of 75,000 liters is
[#permalink]
01 Aug 2016, 04:52

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...