An examination of corruption provides the basis for : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 17 Jan 2017, 21:26

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

An examination of corruption provides the basis for

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 647
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 288 [0], given: 0

An examination of corruption provides the basis for [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Oct 2007, 18:08
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

An examination of corruption provides the basis for rejecting the view that an exact science of society can ever be constructed. As with all other social phenomena that involve deliberate secrecy, it is intrinsically impossible to measure corruption, and this is not merely due to the fact that social science has not yet reached its goal, achievable to be sure, of developing adequate quantifying techniques. If people were ready to answer question about their embezzlements and bribes, it would mean that these practices had acquired the character of legitimate, taxable activities and had ceased to be corrupt. In other words, corruption must disappear if it is to be measurable.

Which one of the following most accurately states a hidden assumption that the author must make in order to advance the argument above?
(A) Some people believe that an exact science of society can be constructed.
(B) The primary purpose of an exact science to quantify and measure phenomena.
(C) An intrinsic characteristic of social phenomena that involve deliberate secrecy is that they cannot be measured.
(D) An exact science of social phenomena that involve deliberate secrecy cannot be constructed.
(E) An exact science can be constructed only when the phenomena it studies can be measured.

If you have any questions
New!
Director
Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 886
Schools: University of Chicago, Wharton School
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 190 [0], given: 7

Re: CR 1000: Examination of corruption [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Oct 2007, 19:48
eyunni wrote:
An examination of corruption provides the basis for rejecting the view that an exact science of society can ever be constructed. As with all other social phenomena that involve deliberate secrecy, it is intrinsically impossible to measure corruption, and this is not merely due to the fact that social science has not yet reached its goal, achievable to be sure, of developing adequate quantifying techniques. If people were ready to answer question about their embezzlements and bribes, it would mean that these practices had acquired the character of legitimate, taxable activities and had ceased to be corrupt. In other words, corruption must disappear if it is to be measurable.

Which one of the following most accurately states a hidden assumption that the author must make in order to advance the argument above?
(A) Some people believe that an exact science of society can be constructed.
(B) The primary purpose of an exact science to quantify and measure phenomena.
(C) An intrinsic characteristic of social phenomena that involve deliberate secrecy is that they cannot be measured.
(D) An exact science of social phenomena that involve deliberate secrecy cannot be constructed.
(E) An exact science can be constructed only when the phenomena it studies can be measured.

I take D.
Director
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 647
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 288 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 1000: Examination of corruption [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Oct 2007, 04:54
Fistail wrote:
eyunni wrote:
An examination of corruption provides the basis for rejecting the view that an exact science of society can ever be constructed. As with all other social phenomena that involve deliberate secrecy, it is intrinsically impossible to measure corruption, and this is not merely due to the fact that social science has not yet reached its goal, achievable to be sure, of developing adequate quantifying techniques. If people were ready to answer question about their embezzlements and bribes, it would mean that these practices had acquired the character of legitimate, taxable activities and had ceased to be corrupt. In other words, corruption must disappear if it is to be measurable.

Which one of the following most accurately states a hidden assumption that the author must make in order to advance the argument above?
(A) Some people believe that an exact science of society can be constructed.
(B) The primary purpose of an exact science to quantify and measure phenomena.
(C) An intrinsic characteristic of social phenomena that involve deliberate secrecy is that they cannot be measured.
(D) An exact science of social phenomena that involve deliberate secrecy cannot be constructed.
(E) An exact science can be constructed only when the phenomena it studies can be measured.

I take D.

Manager
Joined: 20 Feb 2007
Posts: 81
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

24 Oct 2007, 07:24
I think its B, the author talks about 'measure corruption'
VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1473
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 13

Re: CR 1000: Examination of corruption [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Oct 2007, 07:42
eyunni wrote:

An examination of corruption provides the basis for rejecting the view that an exact science of society can ever be constructed. As with all other social phenomena that involve deliberate secrecy, it is intrinsically impossible to measure corruption, and this is not merely due to the fact that social science has not yet reached its goal, achievable to be sure, of developing adequate quantifying techniques. If people were ready to answer question about their embezzlements and bribes, it would mean that these practices had acquired the character of legitimate, taxable activities and had ceased to be corrupt. In other words, corruption must disappear if it is to be measurable.

Which one of the following most accurately states a hidden assumption that the author must make in order to advance the argument above?

(A) Some people believe that an exact science of society can be constructed.

What people believe or not believe is not at issue here.

(B) The primary purpose of an exact science to quantify and measure phenomena.

That's could well be so; but it is not an assumption on which the argument depends

(C) An intrinsic characteristic of social phenomena that involve deliberate secrecy is that they cannot be measured.

This is in line with the overall theme of the argument that whereever secrecy is involved measurement is difficult - but again this is NOT an assumption

(D) An exact science of social phenomena that involve deliberate secrecy cannot be constructed.

THis is directly the conclusion NOT an assumption

(E) An exact science can be constructed only when the phenomena it studies can be measured.

Right...

An assumption is something that must be true in order for the conclusion to hold valid.

The conclusion is that an exact science can never be constructed. Why? because you can't measure it; why can't you measure it? because it's secret; unless it becomes open you will not be able to meaure it BUT if it becomes open it ceases to be something which you would call corrupt - the underlying theme is that a thing must be measurable in order for it to be called an exact science. This is exactly the point stated in choice E.
Director
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 647
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 288 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 1000: Examination of corruption [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Oct 2007, 09:01
dwivedys wrote:
eyunni wrote:

An examination of corruption provides the basis for rejecting the view that an exact science of society can ever be constructed. As with all other social phenomena that involve deliberate secrecy, it is intrinsically impossible to measure corruption, and this is not merely due to the fact that social science has not yet reached its goal, achievable to be sure, of developing adequate quantifying techniques. If people were ready to answer question about their embezzlements and bribes, it would mean that these practices had acquired the character of legitimate, taxable activities and had ceased to be corrupt. In other words, corruption must disappear if it is to be measurable.

Which one of the following most accurately states a hidden assumption that the author must make in order to advance the argument above?

(A) Some people believe that an exact science of society can be constructed.

What people believe or not believe is not at issue here.

(B) The primary purpose of an exact science to quantify and measure phenomena.

That's could well be so; but it is not an assumption on which the argument depends

(C) An intrinsic characteristic of social phenomena that involve deliberate secrecy is that they cannot be measured.

This is in line with the overall theme of the argument that whereever secrecy is involved measurement is difficult - but again this is NOT an assumption

(D) An exact science of social phenomena that involve deliberate secrecy cannot be constructed.

THis is directly the conclusion NOT an assumption

(E) An exact science can be constructed only when the phenomena it studies can be measured.

Right...

An assumption is something that must be true in order for the conclusion to hold valid.

The conclusion is that an exact science can never be constructed. Why? because you can't measure it; why can't you measure it? because it's secret; unless it becomes open you will not be able to meaure it BUT if it becomes open it ceases to be something which you would call corrupt - the underlying theme is that a thing must be measurable in order for it to be called an exact science. This is exactly the point stated in choice E.

awesome man!!! OA is (E).
Current Student
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
Posts: 169
Location: Berkeley, CA
Schools: Berkeley-Haas MBA
WE 1: Investment Management (fund of funds)
WE 2: Private Equity (\$2bn generalist fund)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 7

Re: CR 1000: Examination of corruption [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Oct 2007, 09:04
dwivedys wrote:
eyunni wrote:

An examination of corruption provides the basis for rejecting the view that an exact science of society can ever be constructed. As with all other social phenomena that involve deliberate secrecy, it is intrinsically impossible to measure corruption, and this is not merely due to the fact that social science has not yet reached its goal, achievable to be sure, of developing adequate quantifying techniques. If people were ready to answer question about their embezzlements and bribes, it would mean that these practices had acquired the character of legitimate, taxable activities and had ceased to be corrupt. In other words, corruption must disappear if it is to be measurable.

Which one of the following most accurately states a hidden assumption that the author must make in order to advance the argument above?

(A) Some people believe that an exact science of society can be constructed.

What people believe or not believe is not at issue here.

(B) The primary purpose of an exact science to quantify and measure phenomena.

That's could well be so; but it is not an assumption on which the argument depends

(C) An intrinsic characteristic of social phenomena that involve deliberate secrecy is that they cannot be measured.

This is in line with the overall theme of the argument that whereever secrecy is involved measurement is difficult - but again this is NOT an assumption

(D) An exact science of social phenomena that involve deliberate secrecy cannot be constructed.

THis is directly the conclusion NOT an assumption

(E) An exact science can be constructed only when the phenomena it studies can be measured.

Right...

An assumption is something that must be true in order for the conclusion to hold valid.

The conclusion is that an exact science can never be constructed. Why? because you can't measure it; why can't you measure it? because it's secret; unless it becomes open you will not be able to meaure it BUT if it becomes open it ceases to be something which you would call corrupt - the underlying theme is that a thing must be measurable in order for it to be called an exact science. This is exactly the point stated in choice E.

I picked E too. I agree with dwivedys reasoning... Good job.
Re: CR 1000: Examination of corruption   [#permalink] 24 Oct 2007, 09:04
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
11 An examination of corruption provides the basis for 7 12 Nov 2012, 05:40
9 Whenever anyone tells me that a public official is corrupt, 12 20 Aug 2012, 21:34
2 On the basis of a decrease in the college-age population, 2 10 Mar 2011, 21:39
The authors of a recent article examined warnings of an 9 12 Nov 2007, 12:38
On the basis of a decrease in the college-age population, 4 04 Apr 2007, 15:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by