I thought it would be useful to begin a more in depth examination of MBA rankings for GMAT Clubbers. If you are looking for a scathing indictment of the concept of rankings, you will not find it here. Rankings serve a useful purpose as long as one does not take them too seriously.
A few key ideas
1) Clusters tend to provide a better understanding of the relative standing of schools than forced floor to ceiling rankings
2) Examine the methodology of rankings to make sure they are consistent with your own methodology. Better yet, find a methodology that most nearly captures the perspective of actors whose views you value.
US News is a well known rankings, but generally seems to hold a lower status in the US than BusinessWeek's rankings.
First, there are a number of serious questions about the response rate and mechanics of the survey. Let's set them aside for now.
One of the elements that is disconcerting about US News is the peer review ranking which has a nominal weighting of 25% of the total score.
"In the fall of 2005, business school deans and directors of accredited master's programs in business were asked to rate programs on a scale from "marginal" (1) to "outstanding" (5). Those individuals who did not know enough about a school to evaluate it fairly were asked to mark "don't know." A school's score is the average of all the respondents who rated it. Responses of "don't know" counted neither for nor against a school. About 50 percent of those surveyed responded."
Now comes the obvious question- what business school professor in her right mind honestly believes that (say) Harvard, Kellogg, and Wharton deserve anything less than a 5? It seems far more likely that the professors who gave the leading schools lower scores are confused, deluded, or purposely underrating schools.
Next take a look at the mean starting salary which nominally accounts for 14% of the total score.
"The average starting salary and bonus of 2005 graduates of a full-time master's program in business. Salary figures are based on the number of graduates that reported data. The mean signing bonus is weighted by the proportion of those graduates that reported a bonus, since not everyone who reported a base salary figure reported a signing bonus."
Note how there is no reported adjustment for the cost of living in different regions of the US. To stress the obvious, a low salary in NYC or Boston can easily be a generous one in Dallas or Columbus, Ohio. Even a relatively small adjustment for schools in less expensive major metros can easily change ranks of schools.