|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 25 Jun 2007
Posts: 23
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
An overly centralized economy, not the changes in the [#permalink]
07 Oct 2007, 04:13
Question Stats:
84% (01:36) correct
15% (00:00) wrong based on 6 sessions
An overly centralized economy, not the changes in the climate, is responsible for the poor agricultural production in country x since its new government came to power. Neighboring country y has experienced the same climate conditions, but while agricultural production has been falling in country x, it has been rising in country y.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument?
(a) Industrial production also is declining in country x.
(b) Whereas country y is landlocked, country x has a major seaport.
(c) Both country x and country y have been experiencing drought conditions.
(d) The crops that have always been grown in country x are different from those that have always been grown in country y.
(e) Country x's new government instituted a centralized economy with the intention of ensuring an equitable distribution of goods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 04 Oct 2007
Posts: 20
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR: weakening the argument question [#permalink]
07 Oct 2007, 04:46
D sounds most logical to me
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 903
Schools: University of Chicago, Wharton School
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
30
[0], given: 6
|
Re: CR: weakening the argument question [#permalink]
07 Oct 2007, 09:45
mexicanhoney wrote: An overly centralized economy, not the changes in the climate, is responsible for the poor agricultural production in country x since its new government came to power. Neighboring country y has experienced the same climate conditions, but while agricultural production has been falling in country x, it has been rising in country y.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument?
(a) Industrial production also is declining in country x. (b) Whereas country y is landlocked, country x has a major seaport. (c) Both country x and country y have been experiencing drought conditions. (d) The crops that have always been grown in country x are different from those that have always been grown in country y. (e) Country x's new government instituted a centralized economy with the intention of ensuring an equitable distribution of goods.
D. nothing other than D weakens the argument.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2618
Followers: 13
Kudos [?]:
142
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR: weakening the argument question [#permalink]
07 Oct 2007, 11:34
mexicanhoney wrote: An overly centralized economy, not the changes in the climate, is responsible for the poor agricultural production in country x since its new government came to power. Neighboring country y has experienced the same climate conditions, but while agricultural production has been falling in country x, it has been rising in country y.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument?
(a) Industrial production also is declining in country x. (b) Whereas country y is landlocked, country x has a major seaport. (c) Both country x and country y have been experiencing drought conditions. (d) The crops that have always been grown in country x are different from those that have always been grown in country y. (e) Country x's new government instituted a centralized economy with the intention of ensuring an equitable distribution of goods.
D.
A: this strengthens the argument. Suggesting that centralized economy is to blame.
B: Irrelevent
C: Basically says what the psg said. X and Y experienced the same climate conditions.
E: Doesn't weaken the argument. This is irrelevent.
D: suggests that something else was the cause. i.e. bananas are grown in Y where as brussel sprouts grown in X.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 284
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 2
|
I will also vote for D.
_________________
Trying hard to achieve something unachievable now....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jan 2011
Posts: 401
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 87
|
Re: CR: weakening the argument question [#permalink]
11 Jun 2011, 12:50
Why is A wrong? Doesnt it show that there is some other cause for the effect that is taking place other than the economy?
Industrial production could decline because the demand might be low (not necessarily because of economy) . Please explain in detail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 709
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
73
[0], given: 37
|
Re: CR: weakening the argument question [#permalink]
11 Jun 2011, 17:43
In cause and effect reasoning, for weakening The choice that deals with attacking the relationship between cause and effect is preferred over a choice depicting alternate causes. The above is an empirical rule i developed , while looking at a number of Weakening questions. I always found the above rule to hold in cause-effect reasoning questions  . Crick
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jan 2011
Posts: 401
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 87
|
Re: CR: weakening the argument question [#permalink]
11 Jun 2011, 17:49
crick20002002 wrote: In cause and effect reasoning, for weakening The choice that deals with attacking the relationship between cause and effect is preferred over a choice depicting alternate causes. The above is an empirical rule i developed , while looking at a number of Weakening questions. I always found the above rule to hold in cause-effect reasoning questions  . Crick I am also talking about cause and effect weakening too .
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Status: Mission GMAT
Joined: 20 Apr 2011
Posts: 94
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
18
[0], given: 38
|
Re: CR: weakening the argument question [#permalink]
12 Jun 2011, 06:56
D a- strengthens b- out of scope c- strengthens d- weakense - out of scope
_________________
Hope this post helps!  Your kudos will let me know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1400
Followers: 8
Kudos [?]:
84
[0], given: 10
|
Re: CR: weakening the argument question [#permalink]
13 Jun 2011, 02:31
D in a whisker.
_________________
Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/ Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 27 Dec 2007
Posts: 76
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
7
[0], given: 1
|
Re: CR: weakening the argument question [#permalink]
13 Jun 2011, 05:43
IMO : D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 2100
Followers: 108
Kudos [?]:
655
[0], given: 376
|
Re: CR: weakening the argument question [#permalink]
13 Jun 2011, 06:53
mexicanhoney wrote: An overly centralized economy, not the changes in the climate, is responsible for the poor agricultural production in country x since its new government came to power. Neighboring country y has experienced the same climate conditions, but while agricultural production has been falling in country x, it has been rising in country y.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument?
(a) Industrial production also is declining in country x. (b) Whereas country y is landlocked, country x has a major seaport. (c) Both country x and country y have been experiencing drought conditions. (d) The crops that have always been grown in country x are different from those that have always been grown in country y. (e) Country x's new government instituted a centralized economy with the intention of ensuring an equitable distribution of goods. Conclusion: An overly centralized economy is responsible for bad agriculture yield. Change in climate is NOT Responsible. Reasoning: Neighboring country y has the same climate as country x does, yet y is showing better yield. Weakener: D: It is weakening the statement by saying that same climate may very well be the reason why x has lower yield. Say both x and y are experiencing drought like condition but, x produces rice, which needs water in abundance y produces cotton, which thrives well in dry climate. Thus, y has better yield despite having same climate as x has.
_________________
~fluke
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Mar 2010
Posts: 347
Followers: 7
Kudos [?]:
41
[0], given: 4
|
Re: An overly centralized economy, not the changes in the [#permalink]
25 Aug 2012, 15:08
I was torn between B and D and went with B. Maybe I made too many assumptions here, but if country Y is landlocked while country X has a major seaport, that could explain why country Y is engaged in more farming to sustain itself while country X can rely on imports, etc. In my mind, I though this answer choice presented an alternative as to why Y would have a higher agricultural production despite having identical climate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: An overly centralized economy, not the changes in the
[#permalink]
25 Aug 2012, 15:08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|