|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1255
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
8
[1] , given: 0
|
Anatomical bilateral symmetry is a common trait. It follows, [#permalink]
17 Mar 2005, 22:32
1
This post received KUDOS
Question Stats:
58% (02:25) correct
41% (01:28) wrong based on 117 sessions
Anatomical bilateral symmetry is a common trait. It follows, therefore, that it confers survival advantages on organisms. After all, if bilateral symmetry did not confer such advantages, it would not be common. The pattern of reasoning in which one of the following arguments is most similar to that in the argument above? (A) Since it is Sawyer who is negotiating for the city government, it must be true that the city takes the matter seriously. After all, if Sawyer had not been available, the city would have insisted that the negotiations be deferred. (B) Clearly, no candidate is better qualified for the job than Trumbull. In fact, even to suggest that there might be a more highly qualified candidate seems absurd to those who have seen Trumbull at work. (C) If Powell lacked superior negotiating skills, she would not have been appointed arbitrator in this case. As everyone knows, she is the appointed arbitrator, so her negotiating skills are, detractors notwithstanding, bound to be superior. (D) Since Varga was away on vacation at the time, it must have been Rivers who conducted the secret negotiations. Any other scenario makes little sense, for Rivers never does the negotiating unless Varga is unavailable. (E) If Wong is appointed arbitrator, a decision will be reached promptly. Since it would be absurd to appoint anyone other than Wong as arbitrator, a prompt decision can reasonably be expected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 648
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
6
[0], given: 0
|
(C)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 738
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
(1)symmetry is common so its an advantage.
(2)not an advantage will not be common
C has got this down similary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 246
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
Circular reasoning in the stem. C mimics that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 897
Location: Hyderabad
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 0
|
Agree with C
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 589
Location: SF Bay Area, USA
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 0
|
I go with C too
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 897
Location: Hyderabad
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 0
|
Agree with C
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 656
Followers: 7
Kudos [?]:
106
[0], given: 6
|
Re: CR030222--symmetery [#permalink]
23 Aug 2008, 12:16
If A is true for B, A is true for C. Otherwise if A is not true for C, A is not true for B also. If powell lacks skills, powell misses appoinment. But Powell is appointed, so she has skills. C clearly wins.
_________________
If You're Not Living On The Edge, You're Taking Up Too Much Space
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 13
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
5
[4] , given: 0
|
Re: CR030222--symmetery [#permalink]
23 Aug 2008, 14:42
4
This post received KUDOS
(C) stem follows: x hence y; if not y then not x (where x: common and y:advantage) among choices, try to establish similar logic: a) x hence y; if not x then not y b) no clear logical seq c) x then y; if not y then not x (x: lacked skills, y: not appointed)d) not x then y; not y if x e) x then y; not x, hence y apologies for a bit cryptic response, but i know who is reading this  ..
_________________
rainmaker
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Posts: 452
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
26
[0], given: 1
|
Re: CR030222--symmetery [#permalink]
24 Aug 2008, 00:14
C)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Posts: 288
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
25
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR030222--symmetery [#permalink]
24 Aug 2008, 00:21
chunjuwu wrote: Anatomical bilateral symmetry is a common trait. It follows, therefore, that it confers survival advantages on organisms. After all, if bilateral symmetry did not confer such advantages, it would not be common.
The pattern of reasoning in which one of the following arguments is most similar to that in the argument above?
(A) Since it is Sawyer who is negotiating for the city government, it must be true that the city takes the matter seriously. After all, if Sawyer had not been available, the city would have insisted that the negotiations be deferred.
(B) Clearly, no candidate is better qualified for the job than Trumbull. In fact, even to suggest that there might be a more highly qualified candidate seems absurd to those who have seen Trumbull at work.
(C) If Powell lacked superior negotiating skills, she would not have been appointed arbitrator in this case. As everyone knows, she is the appointed arbitrator, so her negotiating skills are, detractors notwithstanding, bound to be superior.
(D) Since Varga was away on vacation at the time, it must have been Rivers who conducted the secret negotiations. Any other scenario makes little sense, for Rivers never does the negotiating unless Varga is unavailable.
(E) If Wong is appointed arbitrator, a decision will be reached promptly. Since it would be absurd to appoint anyone other than Wong as arbitrator, a prompt decision can reasonably be expected. I agree with everyone on C.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 13 Aug 2008
Posts: 9
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR030222--symmetery [#permalink]
27 Aug 2008, 03:13
I agree with answer C.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 26 Aug 2008
Posts: 22
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR030222--symmetery [#permalink]
27 Aug 2008, 19:23
C makes most sense
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 07 Nov 2010
Posts: 7
Schools: LSE, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Cass
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[1] , given: 8
|
Re: CR -- symmetry [#permalink]
10 Nov 2010, 09:51
1
This post received KUDOS
These are for sure the questions I find the most difficult of the whole test...luckily there is just a few of them...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 29 Sep 2008
Posts: 158
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 1
|
Re: CR -- symmetry [#permalink]
10 Nov 2010, 10:32
c
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 13 Oct 2010
Posts: 26
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 3
|
Re: CR -- symmetry [#permalink]
10 Nov 2010, 16:44
C. Circular Reasoning
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2010
Posts: 203
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Marketing
GMAT Date: 08-27-2012
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Manufacturing)
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
10
[0], given: 26
|
Re: CR -- symmetry [#permalink]
11 Nov 2010, 00:41
agree with c.
_________________
kudos me if you like my post.
Attitude determine everything. all the best and God bless you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1746
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 49
Kudos [?]:
150
[0], given: 108
|
Re: CR -- symmetry [#permalink]
11 Nov 2010, 08:04
+1 C
_________________
"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."
My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Status: swimming against the current
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 256
Location: Chennai, India
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
25
[0], given: 30
|
Re: CR -- symmetry [#permalink]
11 Nov 2010, 08:12
C
_________________
Gonna make it this time
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 17 Aug 2010
Posts: 18
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[1] , given: 4
|
Re: CR -- symmetry [#permalink]
11 Nov 2010, 09:17
1
This post received KUDOS
circular reasoning isn't it?
_________________
Kingfisher The king of good times and a companion in bad ones......
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: CR -- symmetry
[#permalink]
11 Nov 2010, 09:17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Vercules, Legendaddy, noboru, Marcab, metallicafan, rajeevrks27, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, souvik101990, doe007, MacFauz, PTK, carcass, kissthegmat, Narenn
|