Any serious policy discussion about acceptable levels of : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 Jan 2017, 12:49

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Any serious policy discussion about acceptable levels of

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

VP
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 1488
Location: Germany
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 327 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

14 Feb 2005, 13:50
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Any serious policy discussion about acceptable levels of risk in connection with explosions is not well served if the participants fail to use the word "explosion" and use the phrase "energetic disassembly" instead. In fact, the word "explosion" elicits desirable reactions, such as a heightened level of attention, whereas the substitute phrase does not. Therefore, of the two terms, "explosion" is the one that should be used throughout discussions of this sort.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?
(A) In the kind of discussion at issue, the advantages of desirable reactions to the term "explosion" outweigh the drawbacks, if any, arising from undesirable reactions to that term.
(B) The phrase "energetic disassembly" has not so far been used as a substitute for the word "explosion" in the kind of discussion at issue.
(C) In any serious policy discussion, what is said by the participants is more important than how it is put into words.
(D) The only reason that people would have for using "energetic disassembly" in place of "explosion" is to render impossible any serious policy discussion concerning explosions.
(E) The phrase "energetic disassembly" is not necessarily out of place in describing a controlled rather than an accidental
If you have any questions
New!
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1793
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

14 Feb 2005, 13:55
I believe the answer is (A).
(D) comes close
if you negate (D) then it looks as follows

The only reason that people would have for using "energetic disassembly" in place of "explosion" is not to render impossible any serious policy discussion concerning explosions.

The problem with this statement is it does not state why "explosion" should not be used.
VP
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1440
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

14 Feb 2005, 14:01
"A".

Bet "A" and "D", I like "A".
Director
Joined: 04 Jul 2004
Posts: 904
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

14 Feb 2005, 17:27
I am sorry if I sound silly...

I did not get this question at all.

How are assumption and conclusion related?
What are premises here and how they are related to conclusion alongwith assumption?
VP
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 1488
Location: Germany
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 327 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

14 Feb 2005, 23:42
OA is A
Manager
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 190
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

15 Feb 2005, 10:39
well a tough one to swallow , but finally got the correct answere in 4 mins.
15 Feb 2005, 10:39
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 Any serious policy discussion 3 04 Jun 2015, 22:08
6 Any serious policy discussion about acceptable levels of 14 09 Sep 2010, 03:23
25 People with serious financial problems are so worried about 20 25 Mar 2008, 07:51
People with serious financial problems are so worried about 2 14 Mar 2008, 06:04
check out this one homies: Any serious policy discussion 6 22 Nov 2007, 11:29
Display posts from previous: Sort by