Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 26 Aug 2016, 18:40

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 559
Location: SF Bay Area, USA
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Feb 2005, 23:05
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and destruction of a city are excavating in several possible places, including a middle and a lower layer of a large mound. The bottom of the middle layer contains some pieces of pottery of type 3, known to be from a later period than the time of the destruction of the city, but the lower layer does not.

The force of the evidence cited above is most seriously weakened if which of the following is true?
(A) Gerbils, small animals long native to the area, dig large burrows into which objects can fall when the burrows collapse.
(B) Pottery of types 1 and 2, found in the lower level, was used in the cities from which, according to the legend, the besieging forces came.
(C) Several pieces of stone from a lower-layer wall have been found incorporated into the remains of a building in the middle layer.
(D) Both the middle and the lower layer show evidence of large-scale destruction of habitations by fire.
(E) Bronze ax heads of a type used at the time of the siege were found in the lower level of excavation.

Explain please.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5062
Location: Singapore
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 311 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Feb 2005, 23:50
A ??
- If animals have dug burrows and these type 3 pottery fell in, then the large mound could be nothing but simply what they are - large mounds.
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1793
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Feb 2005, 08:01
if( A) happens then the object found on the top layer may very well endup in the bottom later. This is basically tampering of the location of the evidence.
(A) seriously weakens the credibility of the evidence.
Director
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 865
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Feb 2005, 08:10
I am unable to understand the question, can either ywilfred or ananknk tell me what is it that we are trying to weaken.
Manager
Joined: 25 Jan 2005
Posts: 70
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Feb 2005, 08:28
My choice would be A.
You are trying to weaken the fact that the evidence from a latter period of time was found at the botton layer than in the layer above that bottom layer.
If you consider A, it shows that there are some animals which typically dig burrows, and in that process, the ones from the latter period which are in the top layer or at the top of the ground might fall into these burrows and would contradict the fact.

Aryan.
SVP
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2243
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 298 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Feb 2005, 11:04
This question sounds very tricky for me. The question is: What is the evidence for? The people are searching the location of a sieged and destructed city. They discovered a place where some later pieces in the middle section were found and no later pieces in the lower section were found. What does this evidence tell us? That this place is not where the sieged and destructed city was located (because the later piece in middle level)? Or that this place IS where the sieged and destructed city was located (because no later pieces were found in the lower level)? The reason why this question is unclear is that it did not say what position the evidence was used to support.

Different choice of the postion would mean different choice of your answer.
Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 296
Location: California
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Feb 2005, 11:17
Good point HongHu...Actually I still do not understand how A would seriously weaken the force of the evidence. Because I wasn't sure exactly what the evidence was pointing too...
_________________

"No! Try not. Do. Or do not. There is no try.

VP
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 1488
Location: Germany
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 272 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Feb 2005, 15:07
what about E) !

in principal, the oldest pieces should be in the lowest level and the other way around. E) says that a "younger" piece was found in the lower level and the discovery of a older piece was found above it. that means that the piece in the middle layer is not so old as it was interpreted.
SVP
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2243
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 298 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Feb 2005, 18:06
If the position that the evidence was for was my second conjecture, then I'd choose C, actually.
Director
Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 559
Location: SF Bay Area, USA
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Feb 2005, 17:57
OA is A.
Good job everybody!
[#permalink] 18 Feb 2005, 17:57
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and 3 30 Dec 2013, 09:36
Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and 4 27 Jun 2009, 08:09
Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and 12 22 Aug 2008, 15:27
1 Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and 17 05 Apr 2007, 11:33
2 Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and 7 20 Nov 2006, 21:27
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.