Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 02 Oct 2014, 00:59

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 565
Location: SF Bay Area, USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and [#permalink] New post 16 Feb 2005, 22:05
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and destruction of a city are excavating in several possible places, including a middle and a lower layer of a large mound. The bottom of the middle layer contains some pieces of pottery of type 3, known to be from a later period than the time of the destruction of the city, but the lower layer does not.

The force of the evidence cited above is most seriously weakened if which of the following is true?
(A) Gerbils, small animals long native to the area, dig large burrows into which objects can fall when the burrows collapse.
(B) Pottery of types 1 and 2, found in the lower level, was used in the cities from which, according to the legend, the besieging forces came.
(C) Several pieces of stone from a lower-layer wall have been found incorporated into the remains of a building in the middle layer.
(D) Both the middle and the lower layer show evidence of large-scale destruction of habitations by fire.
(E) Bronze ax heads of a type used at the time of the siege were found in the lower level of excavation.

Explain please.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5097
Location: Singapore
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 149 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 16 Feb 2005, 22:50
A ??
- If animals have dug burrows and these type 3 pottery fell in, then the large mound could be nothing but simply what they are - large mounds.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 17 Feb 2005, 07:01
if( A) happens then the object found on the top layer may very well endup in the bottom later. This is basically tampering of the location of the evidence.
(A) seriously weakens the credibility of the evidence.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 870
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 17 Feb 2005, 07:10
I am unable to understand the question, can either ywilfred or ananknk tell me what is it that we are trying to weaken.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Jan 2005
Posts: 70
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 17 Feb 2005, 07:28
My choice would be A.
You are trying to weaken the fact that the evidence from a latter period of time was found at the botton layer than in the layer above that bottom layer.
If you consider A, it shows that there are some animals which typically dig burrows, and in that process, the ones from the latter period which are in the top layer or at the top of the ground might fall into these burrows and would contradict the fact.

Aryan.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2255
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 200 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 17 Feb 2005, 10:04
This question sounds very tricky for me. The question is: What is the evidence for? The people are searching the location of a sieged and destructed city. They discovered a place where some later pieces in the middle section were found and no later pieces in the lower section were found. What does this evidence tell us? That this place is not where the sieged and destructed city was located (because the later piece in middle level)? Or that this place IS where the sieged and destructed city was located (because no later pieces were found in the lower level)? The reason why this question is unclear is that it did not say what position the evidence was used to support.

Different choice of the postion would mean different choice of your answer.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 296
Location: California
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 17 Feb 2005, 10:17
Good point HongHu...Actually I still do not understand how A would seriously weaken the force of the evidence. Because I wasn't sure exactly what the evidence was pointing too...
_________________

"No! Try not. Do. Or do not. There is no try.

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 1493
Location: Germany
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 17 Feb 2005, 14:07
what about E) !

in principal, the oldest pieces should be in the lowest level and the other way around. E) says that a "younger" piece was found in the lower level and the discovery of a older piece was found above it. that means that the piece in the middle layer is not so old as it was interpreted.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2255
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 200 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 17 Feb 2005, 17:06
If the position that the evidence was for was my second conjecture, then I'd choose C, actually.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 565
Location: SF Bay Area, USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Feb 2005, 16:57
OA is A.
Good job everybody!
  [#permalink] 18 Feb 2005, 16:57
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and sumitsarkar82 5 23 Aug 2006, 00:10
Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and dwivedys 4 15 Aug 2006, 21:34
Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and ps_dahiya 10 21 Nov 2005, 21:57
Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and nakib77 5 30 Oct 2005, 12:35
Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and mahesh004 6 24 Oct 2005, 19:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.