Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Are all angles of triangle ABC smaller than 90 degrees? (1) [#permalink]
13 Nov 2008, 01:13

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

Are all angles of triangle ABC smaller than 90 degrees?

(1) 2AB = 3BC = 4AC

(2) (AC)^2 + (AB)^2 > (BC)^2

Now, the OA to this question is A. First, I thought the answer is D, but I was wrong. But I also know that any right triangle has the equation a^2+b^2 = c^2. In statement 2, we rather have a^2 + b^2 > c^2 (assuming that we have the 3 sides to be a,b,c). How come that could also be a right triangle?

I know at least that A is correct because if it is a right triangle, then the ratio of the sides should be either 3:4:5, 5:12:13, etc...but from statement 1, the ratio of 2:3:4 is no way the ratio of a right triangle.

my main concern is with option B, because I honestly thought that it's suff. as "no", but according to the OA, statement 2 can mean both a right triangle and a non-right triangle...how??

I know at least that A is correct because if it is a right triangle, then the ratio of the sides should be either 3:4:5, 5:12:13, etc...but from statement 1, the ratio of 2:3:4 is no way the ratio of a right triangle.

my main concern is with option B, because I honestly thought that it's suff. as "no", but according to the OA, statement 2 can mean both a right triangle and a non-right triangle...how??

Look at my earlier post. Draw a triangle with obtuse angle at B. Stmt2 will still hold true.

I know at least that A is correct because if it is a right triangle, then the ratio of the sides should be either 3:4:5, 5:12:13, etc...but from statement 1, the ratio of 2:3:4 is no way the ratio of a right triangle.

my main concern is with option B, because I honestly thought that it's suff. as "no", but according to the OA, statement 2 can mean both a right triangle and a non-right triangle...how??

Look at my earlier post. Draw a triangle with obtuse angle at B. Stmt2 will still hold true.

there's no way an obtuse will work. An obtuse angle is already more than 90 degrees. So if one of the angle is obtuse, there is simply no way that one of the remaining angles can even be 90. This is because if there is a second angle that has a 90 degrees, then the total sum of angles will be more than 180, which is impossible.

A) 3 sides of the triangle always fix all angles. So we even haven't to go further in order to define presence of a >90 angle.

B) Let's consider the case with huge AB and AC, and small BC. Let's ABC is near 0. Now, let's try to move in mind BC changing ABC angle from 0 to 180. It becomes obvious that we move from triangle with >90 angle at ABC~0 to triangle without >90 angle at AB=AC and again toward triangle with >90 angle at ABC~180. Moreover, duiring the movement we pass two right triangles (ABC=90 and ACB=90).

A) 3 sides of the triangle always fix all angles. So we even haven't to go further in order to define presence of a >90 angle.

B) Let's consider the case with huge AB and AC, and small BC. Let's ABC is near 0. Now, let's try to move in mind BC changing ABC angle from 0 to 180. It becomes obvious that we move from triangle with >90 angle at ABC~0 to triangle without >90 angle at AB=AC and again toward triangle with >90 angle at ABC~180. Moreover, duiring the movement we pass two right triangles (ABC=90 and ACB=90).

Hope this help

walker, your explanation is helpful. I agree with OA being A.

Well, I’ve had a busy month! In February I traveled to interview and visit three MBA programs. Earlier in the month I also went to Florida on vacation. This...

One of the reasons why I even considered Tepper is the location. Last summer I stopped in Pittsburgh on the way home from a road trip. We were vacationing...