Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 01 Sep 2015, 14:44
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Arguing that there was no trade between Europe and East Asia

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1731
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

Arguing that there was no trade between Europe and East Asia [#permalink] New post 07 Jul 2005, 18:30
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Arguing that there was no trade between Europe and East Asia in the early Middle Ages because there are no written records of such trade is like arguing that the Yeti, an apelike creature supposedly existing in the Himalayas, does not exist because there have been no scientifically confirmed sightings. A verifiable sighting of the Yeti would prove that the creature does exist, but the absence of sightings cannot prove that it does not.

Which one of the following best expresses the point of the argument?

(A) Evidence for the existence of trade between Europe and East Asia in the early Middle Ages is, like evidence for the existence of the Yeti, not scientifically confirmed.
(B) In order to prove that in the early Middle Ages there was trade between Europe and East Asia it is necessary to find both Asian and European evidence that such trade existed.
(C) That trade between Europe and East Asia did not exist in the early Middle Ages cannot be established simply by the absence of a certain sort of evidence that this trade existed.
(D) The view that there was trade between Europe and East Asia in the early Middle Ages can only be disproved by showing that no references to this trade exist in surviving records.
(E) There is no more evidence that trade between Europe and East Asia existed in the early Middle Ages than there is that the Yeti exists.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Mar 2005
Posts: 106
Location: NYC
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 07 Jul 2005, 18:54
C
That trade between Europe and East Asia did not exist in the early Middle Ages cannot be established simply by the absence of a certain sort of evidence that this trade existed.
= Parallel to Yeti theory
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 867
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 07 Jul 2005, 19:38
One more for C
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 76
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 07 Jul 2005, 22:39
.C.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 673
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Jul 2005, 03:34
agree with C
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 561
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 09 Jul 2005, 14:54
yep (C).
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Apr 2005
Posts: 352
Location: USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 1

 [#permalink] New post 09 Jul 2005, 16:55
The answer has to be C.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1731
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Jul 2005, 18:08
OA is C.

it is relatively easier one. reason to post is to introduce a highly famous animal "YATI", an ape-like animal believed to be found in Himaaya but not yet proved to be seen.
  [#permalink] 10 Jul 2005, 18:08
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Earlier, any trade relation between the ancient kingdoms of Sphylgor Harley1980 1 18 Aug 2015, 09:00
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic West Egg Vs East Egg WaterFlowsUp 5 05 Jul 2015, 01:17
The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical crazy123 1 01 Jul 2007, 17:46
The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical AK47 7 18 Jan 2007, 02:02
The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical sumitsarkar82 12 23 Aug 2006, 00:05
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Arguing that there was no trade between Europe and East Asia

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.