Aristotle wrote that a tyrant would be well advised to put : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 16 Jan 2017, 20:26

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Aristotle wrote that a tyrant would be well advised to put

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 652
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 0

Aristotle wrote that a tyrant would be well advised to put [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2004, 11:07
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (02:01) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Aristotle wrote that a tyrant would be well advised to put on the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion. Subjects are more tolerant of unjust treatment from a ruler whom they consider god-rearing and pious. Moreover as most subjects believer that even the gods are on the side of the ruler, the subjects are less apt to move against him.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which AristotleтАЩs argument depends?

(A) The subjects of tyrannical rulers typically believe that there is a power other than the mortal.

(B) A tyrant cannot rule unless he has divine power on his side.

(C) The subjects of tyrannical rulers can rarely be fooled by appearances.

(D) Tyrants who are devoted to religion will not treat their subjects unjustly

(E) For a tyrant, the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion is a more effective means of ruling than unjust treatment.
If you have any questions
New!
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1793
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2004, 11:49
A and B look good.
I will go with A
Director
Joined: 28 Oct 2003
Posts: 501
Location: 55405
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2004, 12:10
Agree that A looks good, but posit that B looks like dog vomit.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4302
Followers: 40

Kudos [?]: 429 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2004, 12:21
I believe A is the answer also. B cannot be it because it nowhere mentioned in the statement that a ruler cannot rule if he has no divine power by his side. The premise only says that the subjects of a God-rearing ruler will be less prone to move against him but there is no mention about the ruler not being able to rule without such divine power. C was misleading but it rather weakens the argument instead of being an assumption
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Director
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 652
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2004, 12:49
Paul wrote:
I believe A is the answer also. B cannot be it because it nowhere mentioned in the statement that a ruler cannot rule if he has no divine power by his side. The premise only says that the subjects of a God-rearing ruler will be less prone to move against him but there is no mention about the ruler not being able to rule without such divine power. C was misleading but it rather weakens the argument instead of being an assumption

Can someone translate the argument(question stem) into 21th century English that can
be understood by 4 year old.
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 770
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 205 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Feb 2004, 04:42
Paul wrote:
I believe A is the answer also. B cannot be it because it nowhere mentioned in the statement that a ruler cannot rule if he has no divine power by his side. The premise only says that the subjects of a God-rearing ruler will be less prone to move against him but there is no mention about the ruler not being able to rule without such divine power. C was misleading but it rather weakens the argument instead of being an assumption

Can someone translate the argument(question stem) into 21th century English that can
be understood by 4 year old.

Both premises in the statement describe a favorable relationship between the ruler and the gods. Hence, in order for this to have an effect upon the ruler's subjects, they must also believe in the gods else the effect of this relationship is moot.
_________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah
Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep
Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT
MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005
MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

Intern
Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Aristotle wrote that a tyrant would be well advised to put [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Apr 2016, 04:52
Aristotle wrote that a tyrant would be well advised to put on the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion. Subjects are more tolerant of unjust treatment from a ruler whom they consider god-rearing and pious. Moreover as most subjects believer that even the gods are on the side of the ruler, the subjects are less apt to move against him.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which AristotleтАЩs argument depends?

(A) The subjects of tyrannical rulers typically believe that there is a power other than the mortal.

(B) A tyrant cannot rule unless he has divine power on his side.

(C) The subjects of tyrannical rulers can rarely be fooled by appearances.

(D) Tyrants who are devoted to religion will not treat their subjects unjustly

(E) For a tyrant, the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion is a more effective means of ruling than unjust treatment.

it seems to me answer shoul be A.
Re: Aristotle wrote that a tyrant would be well advised to put   [#permalink] 14 Apr 2016, 04:52
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
7 Aristotle CR. Economic considerations colour every aspect of 18 25 Jul 2011, 03:11
6 Aristotle wrote that a tyrant would be well advised to put 9 23 Feb 2011, 10:22
Anyone tried these questions from aristotle? 3 05 Dec 2010, 07:26
Aristotle wrote that a tyrant would be well advised to put 8 17 Jun 2009, 06:18
The more safety restrictions the government puts on 10 30 Nov 2008, 10:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by