Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Oct 2014, 17:49

Going on right now!

Live Q&A Session with HKU Admissions Team | Join the chat room to participate.


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Around the tenth century A.D, the Byzantine Empire was a

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
avatar
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 2266
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 267

Kudos [?]: 1700 [1] , given: 249

Premium Member
Around the tenth century A.D, the Byzantine Empire was a [#permalink] New post 19 Oct 2010, 07:55
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (01:01) wrong based on 15 sessions
Around the tenth century A.D, the Byzantine Empire was a picture of great affluence and prosperity, until the disastrous fourth crusade fought under the initiation of Pope Innocent III turned the immense fortune into penury and in days to come, the mighty empire eventually cracked and fell to the Ottomans in the middle of the fifteenth century


(A) was a picture of great affluence and prosperity, until the disastrous fourth crusade fought under the initiation of Pope Innocent III turned the immense fortune into penury and in days to come, the mighty empire eventually cracked and fell

(B) was a picture of great affluence and prosperity, until the disastrous fourth crusade fought under the initiation of Pope Innocent III had turned the immense fortune into penury and in days to come, the mighty empire eventually cracked and fell

C) ) had been a picture of great affluence and prosperity, until the disastrous fourth crusade fought under the initiation of Pope Innocent III had turned the immense fortune into penury and in days to come, eventually the mighty empire cracked and fell

(D) had been a picture of great affluence and prosperity, until the disastrous fourth crusade fought under the initiation of Pope Innocent III had turned the immense fortune into penury and in days to come, the mighty empire eventually cracked and had fallen

(E) had been a picture of great affluence and prosperity, until the disastrous fourth crusade fought under the initiation of Pope Innocent III had turned the immense fortune into penury and in days to come, the mighty empire had cracked eventually and then fell
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership


Last edited by daagh on 20 Oct 2010, 03:58, edited 1 time in total.
1 KUDOS received
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: doing good things...
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 1245
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
GMAT 1: Q V
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.77
WE: Corporate Finance (Commercial Banking)
Followers: 157

Kudos [?]: 527 [1] , given: 531

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: The Byzantine Empire [#permalink] New post 19 Oct 2010, 21:23
1
This post received
KUDOS
scheol79 wrote:
A.

Thank you Pkit for nice explanation.

But is past perfect tense considered flat out wrong or only unnecessary when dates are given in GMAT?

I'm wondering if a sentence that starts with a past perfect can actually be an answer.


If the author had been interested in subsequence of two or more events, he would have used past perfect.

Look here: "Two years ago the hurricane destroyed buildings, which had been constructed with violation of main construction procedures.
Buildings were constructed before the hurricane destroyed them. Look for subsequences.
_________________

Follow me, if you find my explanations useful.

Audaces fortuna juvat!

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 193
Location: Finland
Schools: Admitted: IESE($$),HEC, RSM,Esade
WE 1: 3.5 years international
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 18

Re: The Byzantine Empire [#permalink] New post 19 Oct 2010, 08:29
daagh wrote:
Around the tenth century A.D, the Byzantine Empire was a picture of great affluence and prosperity, until the disastrous fourth crusade fought under the initiation of Pope Innocent III turned the immense fortune into penury and in days to come, the mighty empire eventually cracked and fell to the Ottomans in the middle of the fifteenth century


(A) was a picture of great affluence and prosperity, until the disastrous fourth crusade fought under the initiation of Pope Innocent III turned the immense fortune into penury and in days to come, the mighty empire eventually cracked and fell

(B) was a picture of great affluence and prosperity, until the disastrous fourth crusade fought under the initiation of Pope Innocent III had turned the immense fortune into penury and in days to come, the mighty empire eventually cracked and fell

C) ) had been a picture of great affluence and prosperity, until the disastrous fourth crusade fought under the initiation of Pope Innocent III had turned the immense fortune into penury and in days to come, eventually the mighty empire cracked and fell

(D) had been a picture of great affluence and prosperity, until the disastrous fourth crusade fought under the initiation of Pope Innocent III had turned the immense fortune into penury and in days to come, the mighty empire eventually cracked and had fallen

(E) had been a picture of great affluence and prosperity, until the disastrous fourth crusade fought under the initiation of Pope Innocent III had turned the immense fortune into penury and in days to come, the mighty empire had cracked eventually and then fell

Another problem dealing with tenses.
I will simply go for A. I think there is no need to use the perfect tense since the sequence of events in the past are already emphasized in the sentence.
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2010
Posts: 259
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 65

Re: The Byzantine Empire [#permalink] New post 19 Oct 2010, 14:26
A.

Thank you Pkit for nice explanation.

But is past perfect tense considered flat out wrong or only unnecessary when dates are given in GMAT?

I'm wondering if a sentence that starts with a past perfect can actually be an answer.
_________________

Consider KUDOS if my post was helpful. :-D

My Debrief: 750-q49v42-105591.html#p825487

Expert Post
Retired Moderator
avatar
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 2266
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 267

Kudos [?]: 1700 [0], given: 249

Premium Member
Re: The Byzantine Empire [#permalink] New post 20 Oct 2010, 03:21
Expert's post
When I coined this history passage for the GMAT SC, I had the uppermost idea of bringing to the fore the chronology of the events. Timing was essential to the substance of this passage and I felt the best way to express chronology was through the use of differential tenses

There are four distinct events here. In the order of timing they are

1. The affluence of the Byzantine in 10 A.D. until the crusade- until is the cue
2. Its subsequent fall into penury after fourth crusade
3. The might empire cracked due to the penury – marked by the cue word eventually
4. Then the empire fell. Marked by the cue word then

Going by the syntax, IMO, among all the four, the first three events do entail past perfect tenses. The last of the series indicating the empire’s fall qualifies for a simple past.

This is what is apparent in the passage and going beyond this simple reading might land the test taker into time trouble, should a similar thing appear at all in the real GMAT.

E is my official choice
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2010
Posts: 259
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 65

Re: The Byzantine Empire [#permalink] New post 22 Oct 2010, 22:15
Glad I revisited this thread.

These sequence questions are really tough.

I thought A was the answer because I thought the passage made the sequence clear by using words and phrases such as until, in days to come, Around the tenth century A.D, and fifteenth century.

I was told simple past was the best option when the passage already made sequence clear by using specific dates or such words that describe timing.

I'm very confused now. Can someone clarify when to use past perfect and when not to?

I will review MGMAT SC later and see if I can find something.
_________________

Consider KUDOS if my post was helpful. :-D

My Debrief: 750-q49v42-105591.html#p825487

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Oct 2010
Posts: 94
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Re: The Byzantine Empire [#permalink] New post 23 Oct 2010, 01:25
daagh wrote:
Around the tenth century A.D, the Byzantine Empire was a picture of great affluence and prosperity, until the disastrous fourth crusade fought under the initiation of Pope Innocent III turned the immense fortune into penury and in days to come, the mighty empire eventually cracked and fell to the Ottomans in the middle of the fifteenth century


(A) was a picture of great affluence and prosperity, until the disastrous fourth crusade fought under the initiation of Pope Innocent III turned the immense fortune into penury and in days to come, the mighty empire eventually cracked and fell

(B) was a picture of great affluence and prosperity, until the disastrous fourth crusade fought under the initiation of Pope Innocent III had turned the immense fortune into penury and in days to come, the mighty empire eventually cracked and fell

C) ) had been a picture of great affluence and prosperity, until the disastrous fourth crusade fought under the initiation of Pope Innocent III had turned the immense fortune into penury and in days to come, eventually the mighty empire cracked and fell

(D) had been a picture of great affluence and prosperity, until the disastrous fourth crusade fought under the initiation of Pope Innocent III had turned the immense fortune into penury and in days to come, the mighty empire eventually cracked and had fallen

(E) had been a picture of great affluence and prosperity, until the disastrous fourth crusade fought under the initiation of Pope Innocent III had turned the immense fortune into penury and in days to come, the mighty empire had cracked eventually and then fell


unbelievable if the answer is E, i think that the answer is simply A...
this ST is like its reporting an event which happened in the past... dunnit past perfect tense, simple tense is good...
hey, do you have its OE?
Expert Post
Retired Moderator
avatar
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 2266
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 267

Kudos [?]: 1700 [0], given: 249

Premium Member
Re: The Byzantine Empire [#permalink] New post 23 Oct 2010, 06:07
Expert's post
I am unable to see the logic behind dropping the distinction a past perfective renders from the use of simple past, under the pretext of some time line.

IMO, between the occurrences of more than one event, there will
Be always some kind of an ostensible time line that divides them.


Now a correct version from OG

Never before had taxpayers confronted as many changes at once as they confronted in the Tax Reform Act of 1986. (This is the correct Choice D)

In this case, the non-underlined portion expresses a past perfect tense. OG could have simply said “Never before taxpayers confronted”, even though there are definite time lines such as “never before” and the Tax Reform Act of 1986.

Another Correct OG sentence

Before George Eliot became the popular and respected novelist known as George Eliot, she had been an anonymous translator and essayist

Both these cases have very obvious time markers in the form of --before.-

This is my conviction as one who coined the text. If anyone feels otherwise, there is no need to change his or her opinon.
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Re: The Byzantine Empire   [#permalink] 23 Oct 2010, 06:07
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
7 Experts publish their posts in the topic Over 40,000 lead seals from the early Byzantine Empire remai notrandom 7 08 Nov 2013, 20:39
Some of the tenth-century stave churches of Norway are still mm007 4 23 Dec 2006, 21:01
Some of the tenth-century stave churches of Norway are still jeunesis 6 14 Jun 2006, 03:49
Some of the tenth-century stave churches of Norway are still anirban16 1 29 Apr 2005, 08:10
Some of the tenth-century stave churches of Norway are still saurya_s 26 16 Feb 2005, 17:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Around the tenth century A.D, the Byzantine Empire was a

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.