|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4441
Followers: 10
Kudos [?]:
82
[0], given: 0
|
As a rule, those who work in the book publishing industry [#permalink]
19 Aug 2004, 05:23
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
As a rule, those who work in the book publishing industry are underpaid, overworked, and subject to being fired without warning at any time. Moreover, as more and more people turn to computers for both information and entertainment, books are rapidly becoming outdated. It is accordingly inadvisable for young people to choose careers in book publishing.
All of the following are valid objections to the argument above EXCEPT
A) Despite the recent increase in the use of computers, overall book sales have continued to grow
B) Individuals in the publishing industry are no more subject to being fired than are those in many other industries
C) There are numerous fields other than book publishing in which workers are underpaid and overworked
D) For a significant minority, book publishing careers prove to be both enjoyable and lucrative
E) Those interested in leterary endeavors find book publishing to be an ideal working environment
_________________
Best Regards,
Paul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Feb 2004
Posts: 417
Location: USA
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
E??
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4441
Followers: 10
Kudos [?]:
82
[0], given: 0
|
cbrf3 wrote: E?? could you please justify your answer?
_________________
Best Regards,
Paul
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1957
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 0
|
I would go with D. Its says that only few find it interesting and lucrative, which, I feel, is a solid way to day that it is not a godd business for majority. May be it is good only for some writers, editors and not for say printers, proof-readers et cetera. I don't see an objection in D
E says that some find it interesting. which is kind of an objection that those who want to go in this career will go there. OA please.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Posts: 380
Location: Manhattan
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR Publishing industry [#permalink]
19 Aug 2004, 10:05
Paul wrote: As a rule, those who work in the book publishing industry are underpaid, overworked, and subject to being fired without warning at any time. Moreover, as more and more people turn to computers for both information and entertainment, books are rapidly becoming outdated. It is accordingly inadvisable for young people to choose careers in book publishing.
All of the following are valid objections to the argument above EXCEPT A) Despite the recent increase in the use of computers, overall book sales have continued to grow B) Individuals in the publishing industry are no more subject to being fired than are those in many other industries C) There are numerous fields other than book publishing in which workers are underpaid and overworked D) For a significant minority, book publishing careers prove to be both enjoyable and lucrative E) Those interested in leterary endeavors find book publishing to be an ideal working environment
Good question
For me, it came down to D or C (E is out because this is an except question, and E is a valid argument for the argument above)
now, back to D and C
C basically says that there plenty of other fields out there where life sucks
D, if re-written, would say 'most people do NOT find publishing careers to be enjoyable and lucrative'
hence it's D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2004
Posts: 296
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
I vote for C. "There are several other fields that are just as bad" I don't see this as having an relevance to the argument, so what if other fields are as bad? They probably aren't advisable to be in anyway. Who cares! It has not baring on the entry into THIS field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Posts: 380
Location: Manhattan
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
SigEpUCI wrote: I vote for C. "There are several other fields that are just as bad" I don't see this as having an relevance to the argument, so what if other fields are as bad? They probably aren't advisable to be in anyway. Who cares! It has not baring on the entry into THIS field.
You could be right on this. I just don't like the quality of this question altogether, I think the choices presented here are (c and d) both have a shot at being the correct choice
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 19 Jun 2003
Posts: 165
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
what is wrong with B?
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5134
Location: Singapore
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
87
[0], given: 0
|
E. Finding it an ideal enviroment does not dispute the fact that they will be overworked, underpaid and fired at any moment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Dec 2003
Posts: 363
Location: India
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
As a rule, those who work in the book publishing industry are underpaid, overworked, and subject to being fired without warning at any time. Moreover, as more and more people turn to computers for both information and entertainment, books are rapidly becoming outdated. It is accordingly inadvisable for young people to choose careers in book publishing.
All of the following are valid objections to the argument above EXCEPT
( Looking for statement that supports the conclusioni.e . they should not take a career in book industry). Let us eliminate by TAKE/NOT TAKE
A) Despite the recent increase in the use of computers, overall book sales have continued to grow - TAKE- Out
B) Individuals in the publishing industry are no more subject to being fired than are those in many other industries - Take or Not take, does not matter. 50 - 50- OUT
C) There are numerous fields other than book publishing in which workers are underpaid and overworked - Out - this statement says, regardless of the industry, there are underpaid workers, similar to the book industry. Hence choosing other career will not matter. Well, close enough to be the right choice.- Take or Not take, does not matter. 50 - 50.- OUT
D) For a significant minority, book publishing careers prove to be both enjoyable and lucrative - NOT TAKE - Only for a small number of people is this profession lucrative. Hence this is the right choice.
E) Those interested in leterary endeavors find book publishing to be an ideal working environment- Out of scope. Does not say anything specific. - OUT
_________________
Giving another SHOT
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1957
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 0
|
OA Paul.
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4441
Followers: 10
Kudos [?]:
82
[0], given: 0
|
OA is A
OE: Choice A is irrelevant to the conclusion of the passage, since the author claims only that "those involved in publishing" ought to read Publishers Weekly; he makes no assertions about anyone else.
_________________
Best Regards,
Paul
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 1031
Location: Florida
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
I am baffled
chose C; still don't understand how A is better
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Dec 2003
Posts: 363
Location: India
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
Hi Paul
I am unable to understand why A is the best choice. ?. Could you highlight the reason(s).
Thanks
_________________
Giving another SHOT
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4441
Followers: 10
Kudos [?]:
82
[0], given: 0
|
We are looking for an objection so that it is not advisable to work in the publishing industry (PI)
A) out of scope
B) As a rule, those who work in the book publishing industry are underpaid, overworked, and subject to being fired without warning at any time --> if B is true, then it is not true that working in the PI makes you more prone of being fired without warning at any time
C) those who work in the book publishing industry are underpaid, overworked --> PI is not the only field of being underpaid nor overworked; many others are. I agree that this one is weak an attack on the author's claim. However, given that A is out of scope, it is it.
D) those who work in the book publishing industry are underpaid --> not all are underpaid. Again, I find this weak an attack because of the significant minority claim.
E) It is accordingly inadvisable for young people to choose careers in book publishing. --> If people like it as E says, then it cannot be "inadvisable" for them not to pursue a career in PI
Just for the record, I picked E here.
Alright, that's it, enough with Peterson's CR questions. I posted this string of CR because I wanted to see if it were normal that I missed so many of them or that I found them ambiguous. A few of them are ok but this is just overwhelming. Thank you for participating and confirming my doubt. I may perhaps write my little review on their material
_________________
Best Regards,
Paul
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4441
Followers: 10
Kudos [?]:
82
[0], given: 0
|
Actually, A could weaken the argument
A) as more and more people turn to computers for both information and entertainment, books are rapidly becoming outdated --> it is not true as book sales have continued to grow. The only argument to explain this is the OE given previously
_________________
Best Regards,
Paul
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2004
Posts: 296
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
is this a Peterson's question?
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4441
Followers: 10
Kudos [?]:
82
[0], given: 0
|
Yes Sige
_________________
Best Regards,
Paul
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 1031
Location: Florida
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
Paul wrote: Actually, A could weaken the argument A) as more and more people turn to computers for both information and entertainment, books are rapidly becoming outdated --> it is not true as book sales have continued to grow. The only argument to explain this is the OE given previously 
I am sure this wasn't the normal reasoning. seems like Peterson's is trying to get an edge over Kaplan. weirdo!!!
thanks God, peterson's is not the official test taker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3550
Followers: 55
Kudos [?]:
626
[0], given: 781
|
Paul
I am sure most of the book might be ok, but i strongly recommend that you stick to OG and LSAT for CR/RC. The standardized questions from OG/LSAT will atleast have good quality.
Praet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|