As media exposure increased for the Jersey Shore in the last : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 04 Dec 2016, 12:56
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

As media exposure increased for the Jersey Shore in the last

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Expert Post
GMAT Pill Representative
User avatar
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 2048
Location: New York, NY
Followers: 383

Kudos [?]: 1315 [0], given: 8

As media exposure increased for the Jersey Shore in the last [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Apr 2013, 18:25
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

78% (02:21) correct 23% (01:51) wrong based on 160 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

As media exposure increased for the Jersey Shore in the last 5 years, the annual number of people visiting the shore increased each year. Over the same period, however, the number of people getting sun burns from suntanning decreased, even though there was no reduction in the number of people suntanning on the beach each day. Further, the number of sunny days and the UV (Ultraviolet) Index actually increased.

Which of the following, if true for the Jersey Shore over the last 5 years, most helps to explain the decrease?

(A) Sunburns are most likely to happen when beach go-ers suntan for consecutive sunny days at the beach.

(B) Sunburns severely damage at least several people's skin each year at the Jersey Shore (hyperpigmentation, discoloration and burned patches of skin)

(C) People going to the Jersey Shore used suntan lotion with increasing levels of UV protection and monitored UV levels to help determine what times during the day were most suitable for being in the sun.

(D) The average length of stay for people visiting the Jersey Shore increased slightly.

(E) Construction of new shops, malls, and casinos by the Jersey shore helped attract visitors to go indoors rather than stay outdoors.

original source: GMAT Pill
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________


... and more


Image What's Inside GMAT Pill?

Zeke Lee, GMAT Pill Study Method (Study Less. Score More.)


GMAT Pill Reviews | GMAT PILL Free Practice Test

Request Expert Reply
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 136
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 3

Premium Member
Re: Jersey Shore [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Apr 2013, 18:40
C looks best .gives us a reason as why the number of people suffering sunburns will decrease although the number of people visiting the shore has increased
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 1153
Location: United States
Followers: 252

Kudos [?]: 2790 [0], given: 123

Premium Member
Re: Jersey Shore [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Apr 2013, 23:00
IMO, C is correct.

Although there was no reduction in the number of people suntanning on the beach each day, the number of people getting sun burns from suntanning will decrease if these people are protected from sun burns or they go to the beach at a suitable time. C is correct.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 07 Mar 2013
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 1

Re: Jersey Shore [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Apr 2013, 04:55
pqhai wrote:
IMO, C is correct.

Although there was no reduction in the number of people suntanning on the beach each day, the number of people getting sun burns from suntanning will decrease if these people are protected from sun burns or they go to the beach at a suitable time. C is correct.




Hi pqhai,

C can be the ans but does not give us the info that earlier they did not do what they did now (used suntan lotion with increasing levels of UV protection and monitored UV levels to help determine what times during the day )

whereas E clearly mentions a reason why the number with suntanning has decreased :go indoors rather than stay outdoors


Your thoughts pls?
2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 346
Schools: LBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Followers: 191

Kudos [?]: 358 [2] , given: 4

Re: Jersey Shore [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Apr 2013, 05:14
2
This post received
KUDOS
Hi Himus,

The issue with E is that it contradicts with a sentence in the main paragraph:

even though there was no reduction in the number of people suntanning on the beach each day.

Which means that the new shops have not had any impact on the number of people on the beach.

We are looking for something that means that the number of sun burn cases has gone down, whilst the number of people has gone up/stayed the same...
_________________

Former GMAT Pill student, now on staff. Used GMATPILL OG 12 and nothing else: 770 (48,48) & 6.0



... and more

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Jan 2016
Posts: 20
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 37

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
As media exposure increased for the Jersey Shore in the last [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Nov 2016, 14:16
plumber250 wrote:
Hi Himus,

The issue with E is that it contradicts with a sentence in the main paragraph:

even though there was no reduction in the number of people suntanning on the beach each day.

Which means that the new shops have not had any impact on the number of people on the beach.

We are looking for something that means that the number of sun burn cases has gone down, whilst the number of people has gone up/stayed the same...


I chose E, because I reasoned in the following way.

Because of the new attractions in Jersey shore, people did not spend as much time suntanning on the beach as they used to do earlier. Therefore the incidences of Sunburns have decreased.

Can experts please help me understand what was wrong with my reasoning?

Thanks in Advance!!
Expert Post
Verbal Expert
User avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 1951
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Followers: 297

Kudos [?]: 1239 [0], given: 20

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
As media exposure increased for the Jersey Shore in the last [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Nov 2016, 09:44
badboson wrote:
plumber250 wrote:
Hi Himus,

The issue with E is that it contradicts with a sentence in the main paragraph:

even though there was no reduction in the number of people suntanning on the beach each day.

Which means that the new shops have not had any impact on the number of people on the beach.

We are looking for something that means that the number of sun burn cases has gone down, whilst the number of people has gone up/stayed the same...


I chose E, because I reasoned in the following way.

Because of the new attractions in Jersey shore, people did not spend as much time suntanning on the beach as they used to do earlier. Therefore the incidences of Sunburns have decreased.

Can experts please help me understand what was wrong with my reasoning?

Thanks in Advance!!


Your argument is valid. E can definitely be an explanation. However option C is a more direct explanation, whereas for E, a small assumption needs to be taken (that the visitors spent less time outdoors). In absence of C, E would be the best answer.
Chat Moderator
avatar
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 174
GPA: 4
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 81

Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: As media exposure increased for the Jersey Shore in the last [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Nov 2016, 10:19
Looking for an explanation as to why sun burns decreased "even though there was no reduction in the number of people suntanning on the beach each day"

Reason is C.

E doesn't justify the premise in the argument --> "even though there was no reduction in the number of people suntanning on the beach each day"
Re: As media exposure increased for the Jersey Shore in the last   [#permalink] 05 Nov 2016, 10:19
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic Sales of microwave ovens have increased considerably over the last Nevernevergiveup 4 09 Jan 2016, 10:34
Jane got John a portable media player for his birthday last month. Harley1980 1 01 Sep 2015, 07:34
6 The CFO attributes our increased sales last year to the new madhavsrinivas 3 01 Jan 2014, 11:52
6 Experts publish their posts in the topic Jersey Shore Sunburns GMATPill 3 08 Jul 2013, 12:55
Over the last 10 years, there has been a dramatic increase gmatguy1 17 26 Sep 2007, 05:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by

As media exposure increased for the Jersey Shore in the last

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.