|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2797
Location: New York City
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
132
[0], given: 4
|
As the etched lines on computer memory chips have become [#permalink]
10 Aug 2007, 11:28
Question Stats:
37% (02:18) correct
62% (01:07) wrong based on 7 sessions
139. As the etched lines on computer memory chips have become thinner and the chips’ circuits more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive have vastly increased.
(A) the chips’ circuits more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive have
(B) the chips’ circuits more complex, the power of both the chips and the electronic devices they drive has
(C) the chips’ circuits are more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive has
(D) their circuits are more complex, the power of both the chips and the electronic devices they drive have
(E) their circuits more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive have
Please EXPLAIN your answer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Posts: 498
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
48
[1] , given: 1
|
1
This post received KUDOS
I think I like answer B.
the power is agree with the verb has.
In D and E, the use of their is ambigious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 903
Schools: University of Chicago, Wharton School
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
30
[0], given: 6
|
Re: SC1000 #139 Chips [#permalink]
10 Aug 2007, 12:24
bmwhype2 wrote: As the etched lines on computer memory chips have become thinner and the chips’ circuits more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive have vastly increased.
(A) the chips’ circuits more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive have (B) the chips’ circuits more complex, the power of both the chips and the electronic devices they drive has (C) the chips’ circuits are more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive has (D) their circuits are more complex, the power of both the chips and the electronic devices they drive have (E) their circuits more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive have
Please EXPLAIN your answer.
i am also but stuck on this one. I got B too using some other method.
can any one explain why B? why "the chips’ circuits more complex" is not complete?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 875
Followers: 8
Kudos [?]:
135
[1] , given: 0
|
Re: SC1000 #139 Chips [#permalink]
10 Aug 2007, 13:10
1
This post received KUDOS
Fistail wrote: bmwhype2 wrote: As the etched lines on computer memory chips have become thinner and the chips’ circuits more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive have vastly increased.
(A) the chips’ circuits more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive have (B) the chips’ circuits more complex, the power of both the chips and the electronic devices they drive has (C) the chips’ circuits are more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive has (D) their circuits are more complex, the power of both the chips and the electronic devices they drive have (E) their circuits more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive have
Please EXPLAIN your answer. i am also but stuck on this one. I got B too using some other method. can any one explain why B? why "the chips’ circuits more complex" is not complete?
the chips' circuits more complex is the same in A and B. that's not the issue.
B is correct because "____ vastly increased" at the end of the sentence refers back to "the power" which is singular. even though it's talking about the power of two different things, it has to be "has vastly increased" instead of "have vastly increased"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2007
Posts: 197
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
6
[1] , given: 0
|
1
This post received KUDOS
B is the correct answer. A is also grammatically correct but B is clearer choice.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 17 Sep 2005
Posts: 934
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
14
[2] , given: 0
|
2
This post received KUDOS
It's B.
As the etched lines on computer memory chips have become thinner and the chips’ circuits more complex, the power of both the chips and the electronic devices they drive has vastly increased.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2797
Location: New York City
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
132
[1] , given: 4
|
1
This post received KUDOS
b14kumar wrote: It's B.
As the etched lines on computer memory chips have become thinner and the chips’ circuits more complex, the power of both the chips and the electronic devices they drive has vastly increased.
thanks
I now see that AC are both not parallel and DE have ambiguous referents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2797
Location: New York City
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
132
[0], given: 4
|
bmwhype2 wrote: b14kumar wrote: It's B.
As the etched lines on computer memory chips have become thinner and the chips’ circuits more complex, the power of both the chips and the electronic devices they drive has vastly increased. thanks I now see that AC are both not parallel and DE have ambiguous referents.
both should be as close to the word that it modifies as possible
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Posts: 464
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
5
[1] , given: 0
|
1
This post received KUDOS
I go for B.
D and E -> their usage is ambiguous
A and C -> It's the power that increased... not the circuits/devices
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2797
Location: New York City
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
132
[0], given: 4
|
bmwhype2 wrote: b14kumar wrote: It's B.
As the etched lines on computer memory chips have become thinner and the chips’ circuits more complex, the power of both the chips and the electronic devices they drive has vastly increased. thanks I now see that AC are both not parallel and DE have ambiguous referents.
alright made another mistake...DE do not have ambiguous referents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 17 Jul 2007
Posts: 29
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[1] , given: 0
|
1
This post received KUDOS
I'm sorry, but I'm still very confused here.
I think that answer B sounds incomplete. Should it be the chips’ circuits have become more complex?
Thanx!
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 1114
Location: London
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
55
[1] , given: 0
|
1
This post received KUDOS
mashi wrote: I'm sorry, but I'm still very confused here.
I think that answer B sounds incomplete. Should it be the chips’ circuits have become more complex?
Thanx!
As the etched lines on computer memory chips have become thinner and the chips’ circuits more complex, the power of both the chips and the electronic devices they drive has
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Posts: 298
Location: Russia, Moscow
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
10
[2] , given: 0
|
Re: SC1000 #139 Chips [#permalink]
16 Sep 2007, 11:13
2
This post received KUDOS
139. As the etched lines on computer memory chips have become thinner and the chips’ circuits more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive have vastly increased.
(A) the chips’ circuits more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive have (the electronic devices they drive have vastly increased=>does not make sense=>OUT)
(B) the chips’ circuits more complex, the power of both the chips and the electronic devices they drive has (the power...has=>OK)
(C) the chips’ circuits are more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive has (both...has=>OUT)
(D) their circuits are more complex, the power of both the chips and the electronic devices they drive have (the power....have=>OUT)
(E) their circuits more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive have (the electronic devices they drive have vastly increased=>does not make sense=>OUT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2618
Followers: 13
Kudos [?]:
142
[1] , given: 0
|
Re: SC1000 #139 Chips [#permalink]
16 Sep 2007, 23:09
1
This post received KUDOS
bmwhype2 wrote: 139. As the etched lines on computer memory chips have become thinner and the chips’ circuits more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive have vastly increased. (A) the chips’ circuits more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive have (B) the chips’ circuits more complex, the power of both the chips and the electronic devices they drive has (C) the chips’ circuits are more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive has (D) their circuits are more complex, the power of both the chips and the electronic devices they drive have (E) their circuits more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive have
Please EXPLAIN your answer.
Need to use idiom Both X and Y.
Both the power of the chips and the electronic devices... incorrect usage, should be both the power of X and the power of Y.
Elmin ACE.
I was actually stuck btwn B and D b/c I couldn't figure out whether to use have or has.
however, "the power" requires has. So I choose B.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 16 Jul 2007
Posts: 13
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
Re: SC1000 #139 Chips [#permalink]
22 Feb 2008, 16:04
the OA is B
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 297
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 0
|
Re: SC1000 #139 Chips [#permalink]
04 Aug 2008, 10:03
Do we see anything wrong with A? If not why are we picking a choice (B) that has a different meanings from the original?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 25 Oct 2008
Posts: 619
Location: Kolkata,India
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
92
[0], given: 100
|
Re: SC1000 #139 Chips [#permalink]
15 Oct 2009, 19:11
A whole lot of discussion but still not clear. Quote: As the etched lines on computer memory chips have become thinner and the chips' circuits more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive have vastly increased. (A) the chips' circuits more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive have (B) the chips' circuits more complex, the power of both the chips and the electronic devices they drive has (C) the chips' circuits are more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive has (D) their circuits are more complex, the power of both the chips and the electronic devices they drive have (E) their circuits more complex, both the power of the chips OA is Shoul'nt a sentence have the same tense throughout??Since we already have "HAVE" in the non underlined are..shouldnt the correct answer have "HAVE".Please somebody consolidate the explanation for poor people like me:(
_________________
countdown-beginshas-ended-85483-40.html#p649902
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 25 Oct 2008
Posts: 619
Location: Kolkata,India
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
92
[0], given: 100
|
Re: SC1000 #139 Chips [#permalink]
17 Oct 2009, 21:40
guys this is so not clear..PLEASE help. both the power of the chips and t he electronic devices they drive have vastly increased. Plural!How can the correct answer be B??
_________________
countdown-beginshas-ended-85483-40.html#p649902
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 06 Sep 2009
Posts: 115
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
15
[0], given: 3
|
ioiio wrote: I go for B.
D and E -> their usage is ambiguous
A and C -> It's the power that increased... not the circuits/devices Is it really correct that it should be "power... has" (both singular) instead of "powers ... have" (both plural), because it refers to two nouns? I am not a English native speaker. Thanks a lot (one more to my error log!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Posts: 111
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[1] , given: 0
|
Re: SC1000 #139 Chips [#permalink]
23 Oct 2009, 08:20
1
This post received KUDOS
As the etched lines on computer memory chips have become thinner and the chips’ circuits more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive have vastly increased. (A) the chips’ circuits more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive have - subject-verb agreement and idiom (both) (B) the chips’ circuits more complex, the power of both the chips and the electronic devices they drive has (C) the chips’ circuits are more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive has - idiom (both) (D) their circuits are more complex, the power of both the chips and the electronic devices they drive have - not clear lines or chips (E) their circuits more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive have - not clear lines or chips
B for me
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: SC1000 #139 Chips
[#permalink]
23 Oct 2009, 08:20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, Marcab, Narenn, GetThisDone
|