Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 16 Jan 2017, 23:47

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 01 Aug 2007
Posts: 79
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2007, 21:34
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of mutual funds, with the intention to turn in good results in both “bull” and “bear” markets.
(A) with the intention

(B) the intention of which is

(C) intended

(D) and intending

(E) so intended as

Look out for the meaning of the sentence also, before deciding any particular solution.
If you have any questions
New!
Director
Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 886
Schools: University of Chicago, Wharton School
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 190 [0], given: 7

Re: SC: challenging modifier skills [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2007, 22:28
younggun044 wrote:
Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of mutual funds, with the intention to turn in good results in both “bull” and “bear” markets.

(A) with the intention
(B) the intention of which is
(C) intended
(D) and intending
(E) so intended as

Look out for the meaning of the sentence also, before deciding any particular solution.

C. with the intention is not idiomatic but "intended" is.
CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2583
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 420 [0], given: 0

Re: SC: challenging modifier skills [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2007, 23:21
younggun044 wrote:
Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of mutual funds, with the intention to turn in good results in both “bull” and “bear” markets.
(A) with the intention

(B) the intention of which is

(C) intended

(D) and intending

(E) so intended as

Look out for the meaning of the sentence also, before deciding any particular solution.

Down to A or C. I always go for brevity when I can't chose answer choices so C wins.
SVP
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1890
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 291 [0], given: 0

Re: SC: challenging modifier skills [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2007, 23:25
younggun044 wrote:
Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of mutual funds, with the intention to turn in good results in both “bull” and “bear” markets.
(A) with the intention

(C) intended

"intention of" is idiomatic --> A is out

when we ignore appositive phrase "often in the form of mutual funds" , "intended ....markets" is more clearly seens as a participial phrase of "portfolios"

C it is.
SVP
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1890
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 291 [0], given: 0

Re: SC: challenging modifier skills [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2007, 23:33
dwivedys wrote:
younggun044 wrote:

Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of mutual funds, with the intention to turn in good results in both “bull” and “bear” markets.

(A) with the intention ---> prepositional phrase modifies portfolios; however it creates an image that the portfolios have an intention (in active sense) which is illogical. Also, with the intention to is unidiomatic;

(B) the intention of which is ----> The subject of the sentence is portfolios; the adverbial phrase "often in the form of mutual funds" presents additional information (adjectival) modifying portfolios. Now, "the intention of which is" modifies "mutual funds"; Besides being wordy and passive it modifies the wrong entity - mutual funds; It's the portfolios that have been created (comprising of Mutual Funds) to turn in good results...

(C) intended --> Here the participle "intended" modifies "portfolios". Yes one may ask why does it not modify "mutual funds"; All i can say is the adverbial phrase (often in the form of mutual funds) is adjectival and hence parenthetical (can be removed without causing loss of clarity) -- the participle always modifies the nearest noun in the sentence after the sentence is stripped clear of intervening modifying phrases.

(D) and intending --> intending modifies asset allocators; but it's the portfolios that are intended to turn in good results.

(E) so intended as ---> unidiomatic; tries to use the pattern so adjective as; however so adjective as requires a to be verb after as.

Look out for the meaning of the sentence also, before deciding any particular solution.

I'm amazed by your strict understanding of sentence structure. Thank you for your excellent explanation

IMO, grammar books specifically written for sentence structures are more useful than ordinary grammar books.
VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1473
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 13

Re: SC: challenging modifier skills [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Sep 2007, 01:05
laxieqv wrote:
dwivedys wrote:
younggun044 wrote:

Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of mutual funds, with the intention to turn in good results in both “bull” and “bear” markets.

(A) with the intention ---> prepositional phrase modifies portfolios; however it creates an image that the portfolios have an intention (in active sense) which is illogical. Also, with the intention to is unidiomatic;

(B) the intention of which is ----> The subject of the sentence is portfolios; the adverbial phrase "often in the form of mutual funds" presents additional information (adjectival) modifying portfolios. Now, "the intention of which is" modifies "mutual funds"; Besides being wordy and passive it modifies the wrong entity - mutual funds; It's the portfolios that have been created (comprising of Mutual Funds) to turn in good results...

(C) intended --> Here the participle "intended" modifies "portfolios". Yes one may ask why does it not modify "mutual funds"; All i can say is the adverbial phrase (often in the form of mutual funds) is adjectival and hence parenthetical (can be removed without causing loss of clarity) -- the participle always modifies the nearest noun in the sentence after the sentence is stripped clear of intervening modifying phrases.

(D) and intending --> intending modifies asset allocators; but it's the portfolios that are intended to turn in good results.

(E) so intended as ---> unidiomatic; tries to use the pattern so adjective as; however so adjective as requires a to be verb after as.

Look out for the meaning of the sentence also, before deciding any particular solution.

I'm amazed by your strict understanding of sentence structure. Thank you for your excellent explanation

IMO, grammar books specifically written for sentence structures are more useful than ordinary grammar books.

Thanks Laxie. There are so many unresolved questions/concepts that it's still a mind boggling carcass of grammar rules that have to be dealt with every time one attempts to answer these questions.

Partcipial phrases/participles continue to be an enigma especially when they are separated from their subjects by intervening prepositional phrases. I haven't found ONE rock solid rule that could bail us out.

One rule that I have very clearly understood so far relates to SV agreement. No matter what modifiers come in between, they cannot govern the SV agreement; once you've located the subject, the verb must always be made to agree with it.

However, relative clauses and participial modifiers continue to trouble me.

The most recent example was the TOAD INFESTATION question recently discussed.

Besides not being a native speaker always puts us in a dilemma when figuring out differences in structures such as "Toad Infestation" versus "infestation of toads". Instinctively one would think Toad infestation is fine. But on closer look, infestation is a Noun and Toad infestation makes toads an adjective qualifiying the noun Infestation.

That's not the best way to deal with a Noun Toad; the problem is quite amicably resolved if we take help of a preposition and create "Infestation of toads".

Well....as I often say, we don't have a choice but to keep moving..I'm sure we'll get there some day ... Amen.
Re: SC: challenging modifier skills   [#permalink] 23 Sep 2007, 01:05
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of 24 04 Aug 2009, 03:43
2 Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of 12 18 May 2009, 04:21
Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of 6 07 Feb 2009, 18:14
Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of 2 12 Oct 2008, 04:20
Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of 9 25 Apr 2007, 05:01
Display posts from previous: Sort by