Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Apr 2014, 14:44

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Assumption about the third side?

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: 700 (q47,v40); AWA 6.0
Joined: 16 Mar 2011
Posts: 82
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V40
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 3

Assumption about the third side? [#permalink] New post 16 Apr 2011, 09:56
If a data sufficiency question about triangles asks whether a triangle is isosceles and in one of its two provisions mentions that two sides are equal, should we assume that the third side is unequal to the first two? In other words, the question is framed as follows:

Is the triangle in the attached picture isosceles?

1. a = b
2. c <> b

My answer would be E because a = b does not preclude b = c and hence that the triangle is equilateral. Though I agree that all equilateral triangles are isosceles in a sense, I do not assume GMAT will accept that 'sense.

Regards
Rahul
Attachments

File comment: The triangle in the actual problem.
triangle.GIF
triangle.GIF [ 1.33 KiB | Viewed 749 times ]


_________________

Regards
Rahul

Kaplan Promo CodeKnewton GMAT Discount CodesGMAT Pill GMAT Discount Codes
Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 2058
Followers: 123

Kudos [?]: 828 [0], given: 376

GMAT Tests User
Re: Assumption about the third side? [#permalink] New post 16 Apr 2011, 10:08
retro wrote:
If a data sufficiency question about triangles asks whether a triangle is isosceles and in one of its two provisions mentions that two sides are equal, should we assume that the third side is unequal to the first two? In other words, the question is framed as follows:

Is the triangle in the attached picture isosceles?

1. a = b
2. c <> b

My answer would be E because a = b does not preclude b = c and hence that the triangle is equilateral. Though I agree that all equilateral triangles are isosceles in a sense, I do not assume GMAT will accept that 'sense.

Even if you consider that b could be equal to c, 2nd statement specifies that it ain't. Using both statements, we can definitely conclude that the triangle is an isosceles. But, I believe the answer should be A. Please refute if others don't agree.

Regards
Rahul


retro:
Is this an official Data Sufficiency question?

If yes, "A" should be sufficient.

I believe an equilateral triangle is a special type of isosceles. I am not 100% sure though.

Also,
Square is special rectangle
Square is special rhombus.

There may be more such cases.

I get a feeling that this question is meant more for the main Math forum(Intellectual Discussion) than an official "Data Sufficiency" question.

What do you say?
_________________

~fluke

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: 700 (q47,v40); AWA 6.0
Joined: 16 Mar 2011
Posts: 82
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V40
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 3

Re: Assumption about the third side? [#permalink] New post 16 Apr 2011, 10:37
The question comes into this list because it is a DS question. The concept is mathematical.

I'd disagree with the answer being A because IT DOES NOT PRECLUDE the third side also being equal.

I agree with you that I should go with answer C. My initial post had a typo.
It is not from the OG. It is from Nova's guide.

Regards
Rahul
_________________

Regards
Rahul

Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 2058
Followers: 123

Kudos [?]: 828 [0], given: 376

GMAT Tests User
Re: Assumption about the third side? [#permalink] New post 16 Apr 2011, 10:41
retro wrote:
The question comes into this list because it is a DS question. The concept is mathematical.

I'd disagree with the answer being A because IT DOES NOT PRECLUDE the third side also being equal.

It is not from the OG. It is from Nova's guide.

Regards
Rahul


Let me move it to the Data Sufficiency sub-forum and wait for others to respond.

What's the "OA"?
_________________

~fluke

GMAT Instructor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 967
Location: Toronto
Followers: 237

Kudos [?]: 578 [0], given: 3

GMAT Tests User
Re: Assumption about the third side? [#permalink] New post 16 Apr 2011, 10:47
In contemporary mathematics, an equilateral triangle is normally considered to also be isosceles, in the same way that a square is considered to be a rectangle and a parallelogram. Euclid and other classical geometers, however, defined an isosceles triangle to be one with two equal sides and one unequal side. So there's no universal agreement about whether to consider an equilateral triangle to be isosceles. The GMAT simply can never test you on something that mathematicians cannot even agree about: many test takers could legitimately dispute the correct answer. This is the kind of technicality you'll never need to worry about, and you won't see a question like the one in the original post above on the real test.
_________________

Nov 2011: After years of development, I am now making my advanced Quant books and high-level problem sets available for sale. Contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com for details.

Private GMAT Tutor based in Toronto

Manager
Manager
Joined: 17 Jan 2011
Posts: 243
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 4

GMAT Tests User
Re: Assumption about the third side? [#permalink] New post 16 Apr 2011, 10:49
It should be A.

This link calls equi. as a special case of isosceles
http://library.thinkquest.org/20991/geo/ietri.html

Retro - why did you rule out C i.e both together are sufficient. Point 1 gives a relationship between two sides and point 2 provides information for the other two
A=B
B<>C
implies A<>C, so it is an isosceles tri.
_________________

Good Luck!!!

***Help and be helped!!!****

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: 700 (q47,v40); AWA 6.0
Joined: 16 Mar 2011
Posts: 82
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V40
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 3

Re: Assumption about the third side? [#permalink] New post 16 Apr 2011, 10:54
I am not ruling out C. In fact, that was my first choice but for a typo in my first post.

Rgds
Rahul
_________________

Regards
Rahul

Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 2058
Followers: 123

Kudos [?]: 828 [0], given: 376

GMAT Tests User
Re: Assumption about the third side? [#permalink] New post 16 Apr 2011, 11:19
Please take a look at this Real GMAT question from the past.
isosceles-triangle-96685.html

GMAT does consider a triangle with at least 2 equal sides as isosceles.
_________________

~fluke

Re: Assumption about the third side?   [#permalink] 16 Apr 2011, 11:19
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts CR - GEOLOGISTS' ASSUMPTION ABOUT OIL gmatblast 9 10 Aug 2004, 13:36
New posts 1 How about second and third teir university? becoolja 1 29 Oct 2004, 08:59
New posts About one-third of the BIOLOGY CLASS STUDENTS have / has gmatbull 7 07 Aug 2010, 00:54
New posts 1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Between what two numbers is the measure of the third side of agnok 8 09 Sep 2010, 09:27
New posts 1 Geometry question about polygons with more than 4 sides agdimple333 7 05 May 2011, 16:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Assumption about the third side?

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.