Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 27 Feb 2015, 04:00


GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance


we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

assumption question

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 183
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

assumption question [#permalink] New post 05 May 2007, 07:05
Because ethylene dibromide, a chemical used to fumigate grain, was blamed for the high rate of nerve damage suffered by people who work in grain-processing plants, many such plants switched to other chemical fumigants 2 years ago. Since then, however, the percentage of workers at these plants who were newly diagnosed with nerve damage has not dropped significantly. Therefore, either ethylene dibromide was wrongly blamed or else the new chemicals also cause nerve damage.
Which of the following is an assumption on which argument depends?

A. If the new chemicals cause nerve damage, the nerve damage caused would be different from any nerve damage that ethylene dibromide may cause.
B. There are no chemical fumigants that are completely safe for workers in grain-processing plants.
C. If ethylene dibromide causes nerve damage, it does not take 2 years or longer for that damage to become detectable.
D. Workers at grain-processing plants typically continue to work there even after being diagnosed with nerve damage.
E. Workers at grain-processing plants that still use ethylene dibromide continue to have a high rate of nere damage.

I chose C, but basically I kind of guessed.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2007
Posts: 329
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 05 May 2007, 07:49
I think your answer (C) is correct. If the new chemical could cause the nerve damage, then the former chemical is not responsible, therefore it doesn't take the old chemical 2 years or more the become detectible.

A. Out of scope, we don't know and it is irrelevant
B. Irrelevant
C. Yes, either the cemicals are not responsible or the new chemical is the source, because the first is not used for 2 years. Best answer!
D. Irrelevant, blablabla
E. True, but irrelevant
User avatar
Joined: 01 Dec 2006
Posts: 58
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 14 May 2007, 11:40
User avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 220
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 14 May 2007, 12:54
clear C
  [#permalink] 14 May 2007, 12:54
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Assumption questions.. ashokkumar 2 02 Oct 2009, 18:43
Experts publish their posts in the topic Assumption questions.. ashokkumar 1 02 Oct 2009, 14:29
assumption question Jamesk486 2 01 Jun 2007, 15:49
assumption question Jamesk486 4 12 May 2007, 07:58
Assumption question amansingla4 9 04 May 2006, 21:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by

assumption question

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.