assumption question : GMAT Verbal Section
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 16 Jan 2017, 05:30

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# assumption question

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 180
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 May 2007, 07:05
Because ethylene dibromide, a chemical used to fumigate grain, was blamed for the high rate of nerve damage suffered by people who work in grain-processing plants, many such plants switched to other chemical fumigants 2 years ago. Since then, however, the percentage of workers at these plants who were newly diagnosed with nerve damage has not dropped significantly. Therefore, either ethylene dibromide was wrongly blamed or else the new chemicals also cause nerve damage.
Which of the following is an assumption on which argument depends?

A. If the new chemicals cause nerve damage, the nerve damage caused would be different from any nerve damage that ethylene dibromide may cause.
B. There are no chemical fumigants that are completely safe for workers in grain-processing plants.
C. If ethylene dibromide causes nerve damage, it does not take 2 years or longer for that damage to become detectable.
D. Workers at grain-processing plants typically continue to work there even after being diagnosed with nerve damage.
E. Workers at grain-processing plants that still use ethylene dibromide continue to have a high rate of nere damage.

I chose C, but basically I kind of guessed.
If you have any questions
New!
Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Mar 2007
Posts: 329
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 May 2007, 07:49
I think your answer (C) is correct. If the new chemical could cause the nerve damage, then the former chemical is not responsible, therefore it doesn't take the old chemical 2 years or more the become detectible.

A. Out of scope, we don't know and it is irrelevant
B. Irrelevant
C. Yes, either the cemicals are not responsible or the new chemical is the source, because the first is not used for 2 years. Best answer!
D. Irrelevant, blablabla
E. True, but irrelevant
Manager
Joined: 01 Dec 2006
Posts: 58
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 May 2007, 11:40
C
Manager
Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 217
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 May 2007, 12:54
clear C
14 May 2007, 12:54
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Inference/Assumption Questions 0 17 Nov 2014, 18:00
1 Build skill in Assumption Questions 0 14 Aug 2014, 01:38
2 CR assumption questions approach 3 20 Oct 2012, 10:06
assumption question 2 01 Jun 2007, 15:49
assumption question 6 12 May 2007, 07:58
Display posts from previous: Sort by