Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 18 May 2013, 23:26
Customize  |  Hide

Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Apr 2008
Posts: 56
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as [#permalink] New post 04 May 2008, 18:27
00:00

Question Stats:

60% (01:44) correct 40% (00:21) wrong based on 0 sessions
Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340.000 years ago, emitting dazzling radiation that could have disrupted Earth's protective ozone layer and sunburned our Stone Age ancestors.

A. that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
B. that a star as bright as the full moon exploded into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
C. of a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago and that it emitted
D. of a star as bright as the full moon, exploding into view 340,000 years ago and emitting
E. of a star as bright as the full moon that exploded into view 340,000 years ago and that emitted

Last edited by quiet888 on 04 May 2008, 18:42, edited 1 time in total.
SVP
SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1946
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC - astronomers [#permalink] New post 04 May 2008, 18:35
quiet888 wrote:
Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340.000 years ago, emitting dazzling radiation that could have disrupted Earth's protective ozone layer and sunburned our Stone Age ancestors.

A. that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
B. that a star as bright as the full moon exploded into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
C. of a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago and that it emitted
D. of a star as bright as the full moon, exploding into view 340,000 years ago and emitting
E. of a star as bright as the full moon that exploded into view 340,000 years ago and that emitted


E.
Because I need a parallelism btw "sunburned" and "emitted".
I think "sunburned" can not parallel with "emitting" in A, B, D, so all of these out
C confusal "it"
_________________

Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates

Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Apr 2008
Posts: 56
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - astronomers [#permalink] New post 04 May 2008, 18:43
Correct answer is B. Though still don't understand why.
Anyone can help?
SVP
SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1946
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC - astronomers [#permalink] New post 04 May 2008, 18:49
Admittedly, I am weak at parallelism. Which parts paralles still be a myth to me! Wait to see a thorough guide!
_________________

Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates

Director
Director
Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Posts: 559
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC - astronomers [#permalink] New post 04 May 2008, 18:53
sondenso wrote:
quiet888 wrote:
Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340.000 years ago, emitting dazzling radiation that could have disrupted Earth's protective ozone layer and sunburned our Stone Age ancestors.

A. that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
B. that a star as bright as the full moon exploded into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
C. of a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago and that it emitted
D. of a star as bright as the full moon, exploding into view 340,000 years ago and emitting
E. of a star as bright as the full moon that exploded into view 340,000 years ago and that emitted


E.
Because I need a parallelism btw "sunburned" and "emitted".
I think "sunburned" can not parallel with "emitting" in A, B, D, so all of these out
C confusal "it"

To start with I am assuming it is the star that exploded , not the moon.
So, 'that' in E is modifying moon.(and incorrectly saying that moon exploded)
Same problem with A.
In C, no clear referrent for 'it'. (moon or star?)
In D, Astronomers have uncovered evidence of X, exploding...(you see something wrong here.Did Astronmers exploded?)

B clearly says, Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star(as bright as full moon) exploded...,emitting...
Clearly star exploded, and star is emitting.

Last edited by mymba99 on 04 May 2008, 18:54, edited 1 time in total.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 513
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
Re: SC - astronomers [#permalink] New post 04 May 2008, 18:54
Answer B :

1) Correct Idiom :- evidence that

2) You have only two choices left now A, B . In A using exploding was a verb error. It should have been exploded
1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1946
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 168 [1] , given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC - astronomers [#permalink] New post 04 May 2008, 19:00
1
This post received
KUDOS
saravalli wrote:
sondenso wrote:
quiet888 wrote:
Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340.000 years ago, emitting dazzling radiation that could have disrupted Earth's protective ozone layer and sunburned our Stone Age ancestors.

A. that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
B. that a star as bright as the full moon exploded into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
C. of a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago and that it emitted
D. of a star as bright as the full moon, exploding into view 340,000 years ago and emitting
E. of a star as bright as the full moon that exploded into view 340,000 years ago and that emitted


E.
Because I need a parallelism btw "sunburned" and "emitted".
I think "sunburned" can not parallel with "emitting" in A, B, D, so all of these out
C confusal "it"

To start with I am assuming it is the star that exploded , not the moon.
So, 'that' in E is modifying moon.(and incorrectly saying that moon exploded)
Same problem with A.
In C, no clear referrent for 'it'. (moon or star?)
In D, Astronomers have uncovered evidence of X, exploding...(you see something wrong here.Did Astronmers exploded?)

B clearly says, Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star(as bright as full moon) exploded...,emitting...
Clearly star exploded, and star is emitting.


Many thanks Saravalli,

This way is helpful, I try to use it later and see how it is! Thanks
_________________

Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2998
Followers: 48

Kudos [?]: 390 [0], given: 210

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC - astronomers [#permalink] New post 05 May 2008, 07:31
This is about idiom and progressive tense.
correct idiom : evidence that .... Leaves A, B

Between A,B, A implies that the star "was" as bright as as the moon incorrectly.

quiet888 wrote:
Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340.000 years ago, emitting dazzling radiation that could have disrupted Earth's protective ozone layer and sunburned our Stone Age ancestors.

A. that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
B. that a star as bright as the full moon exploded into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
C. of a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago and that it emitted
D. of a star as bright as the full moon, exploding into view 340,000 years ago and emitting
E. of a star as bright as the full moon that exploded into view 340,000 years ago and that emitted
Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Enjoying the GMAT journey....
Joined: 26 Aug 2011
Posts: 729
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V24
Followers: 45

Kudos [?]: 206 [0], given: 261

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Re: Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as [#permalink] New post 19 Jan 2012, 00:18
with B.
E has misplaced modifier.
_________________

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.

A WAY TO INCREASE FROM QUANT 35-40 TO 47 : a-way-to-increase-from-q35-40-to-q-138750.html

Q 47/48 To Q 50 + the-final-climb-quest-for-q-50-from-q47-129441.html#p1064367

Three good RC strategies three-different-strategies-for-attacking-rc-127287.html

Re: Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as   [#permalink] 19 Jan 2012, 00:18
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Astronomers studying the newly discovered star say that it sonaketu 3 21 Apr 2005, 09:31
New posts Astronomers studying the newly discovered star say that it rahulraao 6 26 Oct 2005, 07:49
New posts Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as misterJJ2u 1 03 Jul 2007, 10:02
New posts Physiological research has uncovered disturbing evidence Fistail 9 22 Aug 2007, 21:25
New posts Physiological research has uncovered disturbing evidence hanumayamma 6 30 Jul 2008, 17:07
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.