Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Jul 2016, 15:48
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

5 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Apr 2008
Posts: 56
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 68 [5] , given: 0

Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 May 2008, 18:27
5
This post received
KUDOS
12
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

53% (02:02) correct 47% (01:10) wrong based on 1047 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340.000 years ago, emitting dazzling radiation that could have disrupted Earth's protective ozone layer and sunburned our Stone Age ancestors.

A. that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
B. that a star as bright as the full moon exploded into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
C. of a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago and that it emitted
D. of a star as bright as the full moon, exploding into view 340,000 years ago and emitting
E. of a star as bright as the full moon that exploded into view 340,000 years ago and that emitted
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by pqhai on 13 Dec 2013, 13:52, edited 2 times in total.
Added OA
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1926
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 820 [0], given: 1

Premium Member
Re: SC - astronomers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 May 2008, 18:35
quiet888 wrote:
Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340.000 years ago, emitting dazzling radiation that could have disrupted Earth's protective ozone layer and sunburned our Stone Age ancestors.

A. that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
B. that a star as bright as the full moon exploded into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
C. of a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago and that it emitted
D. of a star as bright as the full moon, exploding into view 340,000 years ago and emitting
E. of a star as bright as the full moon that exploded into view 340,000 years ago and that emitted


E.
Because I need a parallelism btw "sunburned" and "emitted".
I think "sunburned" can not parallel with "emitting" in A, B, D, so all of these out
C confusal "it"
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Apr 2008
Posts: 56
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 68 [1] , given: 0

Re: SC - astronomers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 May 2008, 18:43
1
This post received
KUDOS
Correct answer is B. Though still don't understand why.
Anyone can help?
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1926
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 820 [0], given: 1

Premium Member
Re: SC - astronomers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 May 2008, 18:49
Admittedly, I am weak at parallelism. Which parts paralles still be a myth to me! Wait to see a thorough guide!
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

3 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Posts: 554
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 266 [3] , given: 2

Re: SC - astronomers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 May 2008, 18:53
3
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
sondenso wrote:
quiet888 wrote:
Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340.000 years ago, emitting dazzling radiation that could have disrupted Earth's protective ozone layer and sunburned our Stone Age ancestors.

A. that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
B. that a star as bright as the full moon exploded into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
C. of a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago and that it emitted
D. of a star as bright as the full moon, exploding into view 340,000 years ago and emitting
E. of a star as bright as the full moon that exploded into view 340,000 years ago and that emitted


E.
Because I need a parallelism btw "sunburned" and "emitted".
I think "sunburned" can not parallel with "emitting" in A, B, D, so all of these out
C confusal "it"

To start with I am assuming it is the star that exploded , not the moon.
So, 'that' in E is modifying moon.(and incorrectly saying that moon exploded)
Same problem with A.
In C, no clear referrent for 'it'. (moon or star?)
In D, Astronomers have uncovered evidence of X, exploding...(you see something wrong here.Did Astronmers exploded?)

B clearly says, Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star(as bright as full moon) exploded...,emitting...
Clearly star exploded, and star is emitting.

Last edited by mymba99 on 04 May 2008, 18:54, edited 1 time in total.
1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 513
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 49 [1] , given: 0

Reviews Badge
Re: SC - astronomers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 May 2008, 18:54
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Answer B :

1) Correct Idiom :- evidence that

2) You have only two choices left now A, B . In A using exploding was a verb error. It should have been exploded
1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1926
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 820 [1] , given: 1

Premium Member
Re: SC - astronomers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 May 2008, 19:00
1
This post received
KUDOS
saravalli wrote:
sondenso wrote:
quiet888 wrote:
Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340.000 years ago, emitting dazzling radiation that could have disrupted Earth's protective ozone layer and sunburned our Stone Age ancestors.

A. that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
B. that a star as bright as the full moon exploded into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
C. of a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago and that it emitted
D. of a star as bright as the full moon, exploding into view 340,000 years ago and emitting
E. of a star as bright as the full moon that exploded into view 340,000 years ago and that emitted


E.
Because I need a parallelism btw "sunburned" and "emitted".
I think "sunburned" can not parallel with "emitting" in A, B, D, so all of these out
C confusal "it"

To start with I am assuming it is the star that exploded , not the moon.
So, 'that' in E is modifying moon.(and incorrectly saying that moon exploded)
Same problem with A.
In C, no clear referrent for 'it'. (moon or star?)
In D, Astronomers have uncovered evidence of X, exploding...(you see something wrong here.Did Astronmers exploded?)

B clearly says, Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star(as bright as full moon) exploded...,emitting...
Clearly star exploded, and star is emitting.


Many thanks Saravalli,

This way is helpful, I try to use it later and see how it is! Thanks
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2989
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 545 [0], given: 210

Re: SC - astronomers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 May 2008, 07:31
This is about idiom and progressive tense.
correct idiom : evidence that .... Leaves A, B

Between A,B, A implies that the star "was" as bright as as the moon incorrectly.

quiet888 wrote:
Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340.000 years ago, emitting dazzling radiation that could have disrupted Earth's protective ozone layer and sunburned our Stone Age ancestors.

A. that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
B. that a star as bright as the full moon exploded into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
C. of a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago and that it emitted
D. of a star as bright as the full moon, exploding into view 340,000 years ago and emitting
E. of a star as bright as the full moon that exploded into view 340,000 years ago and that emitted
Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Enjoying the GMAT journey....
Joined: 26 Aug 2011
Posts: 735
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V24
Followers: 69

Kudos [?]: 457 [0], given: 264

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jan 2012, 00:18
with B.
E has misplaced modifier.
_________________

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.

A WAY TO INCREASE FROM QUANT 35-40 TO 47 : http://gmatclub.com/forum/a-way-to-increase-from-q35-40-to-q-138750.html

Q 47/48 To Q 50 + http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-final-climb-quest-for-q-50-from-q47-129441.html#p1064367

Three good RC strategies http://gmatclub.com/forum/three-different-strategies-for-attacking-rc-127287.html

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Posts: 900
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 856 [0], given: 543

Re: Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jul 2013, 06:13
Idiom is Evidence "that"

So only A and B are left

In option A Exploding is modifying moon and this doesn't make any sense!

Option B is correct!
_________________

Click +1 Kudos if my post helped...

Amazing Free video explanation for all Quant questions from OG 13 and much more http://www.gmatquantum.com/og13th/

GMAT Prep software What if scenarios http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-prep-software-analysis-and-what-if-scenarios-146146.html

9 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1153
Location: United States
Followers: 230

Kudos [?]: 2476 [9] , given: 123

Premium Member
Re: Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Dec 2013, 14:09
9
This post received
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Hello guys.
This question is very good to practice Verb-ing modifier, Verb-ed modifier and relative clause "that".

NOTE:
Verb-ing modifier + NO commas ==> modifies preceding noun.
"that" + NO commas ==> modifies a preceding noun.
Verb-ed modifier ==> always modifiers preceding noun.


Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340.000 years ago, emitting dazzling radiation that could have disrupted Earth's protective ozone layer and sunburned our Stone Age ancestors.

A. that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
Wrong. "exploding" modifies "moon" <-- wrong.

B. that a star as bright as the full moon exploded into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
Correct.. "emitting" is modifier + comma --> modifies the preceding clause --> give the result of the explosion of the star.

C. of a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago and that it emitted
Wrong. "exploding" modifies "moon" <-- wrong.

D. of a star as bright as the full moon, exploding into view 340,000 years ago and emitting
Wrong. "exploding" is modifier. But we need MAIN verb here --> "exploded" is correct, not "exploding".

E. of a star as bright as the full moon that exploded into view 340,000 years ago and that emitted
Wrong. "that" modifies "moon" --> moon exploded ? Wrong meaning.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Sep 2013
Posts: 3
Location: India
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 105

Re: Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Dec 2013, 08:18
pqhai wrote:
Hello guys.
This question is very good to practice Verb-ing modifier, Verb-ed modifier and relative clause "that".

NOTE:
Verb-ing modifier + NO commas ==> modifies preceding noun.
"that" + NO commas ==> modifies a preceding noun.
Verb-ed modifier ==> always modifiers preceding noun.


Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340.000 years ago, emitting dazzling radiation that could have disrupted Earth's protective ozone layer and sunburned our Stone Age ancestors.

A. that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
Wrong. "exploding" modifies "moon" <-- wrong.

B. that a star as bright as the full moon exploded into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
Correct.. "emitting" is modifier + comma --> modifies the preceding clause --> give the result of the explosion of the star.

C. of a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago and that it emitted
Wrong. "exploding" modifies "moon" <-- wrong.

D. of a star as bright as the full moon, exploding into view 340,000 years ago and emitting
Wrong. "exploding" is modifier. But we need MAIN verb here --> "exploded" is correct, not "exploding".

E. of a star as bright as the full moon that exploded into view 340,000 years ago and that emitted
Wrong. "that" modifies "moon" --> moon exploded ? Wrong meaning.

Hope it helps.



Hi Pqhai,

you said that "Verb-ed modifier ==> always modifiers preceding noun",as per this in option B the verb Exploded should modify Full Moon rite?Please Clarify if i am missing something.

oh i think Exploded will be considered as a Modifier only when it is preceded by "that".Am i correct?
1 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1153
Location: United States
Followers: 230

Kudos [?]: 2476 [1] , given: 123

Premium Member
Re: Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Dec 2013, 13:51
1
This post received
KUDOS
vamshiande wrote:
pqhai wrote:
Hello guys.
This question is very good to practice Verb-ing modifier, Verb-ed modifier and relative clause "that".

NOTE:
Verb-ing modifier + NO commas ==> modifies preceding noun.
"that" + NO commas ==> modifies a preceding noun.
Verb-ed modifier ==> always modifiers preceding noun.


Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340.000 years ago, emitting dazzling radiation that could have disrupted Earth's protective ozone layer and sunburned our Stone Age ancestors.

A. that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
Wrong. "exploding" modifies "moon" <-- wrong.

B. that a star as bright as the full moon exploded into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
Correct.. "emitting" is modifier + comma --> modifies the preceding clause --> give the result of the explosion of the star.

C. of a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago and that it emitted
Wrong. "exploding" modifies "moon" <-- wrong.

D. of a star as bright as the full moon, exploding into view 340,000 years ago and emitting
Wrong. "exploding" is modifier. But we need MAIN verb here --> "exploded" is correct, not "exploding".

E. of a star as bright as the full moon that exploded into view 340,000 years ago and that emitted
Wrong. "that" modifies "moon" --> moon exploded ? Wrong meaning.

Hope it helps.



Hi Pqhai,

you said that "Verb-ed modifier ==> always modifiers preceding noun",as per this in option B the verb Exploded should modify Full Moon rite?Please Clarify if i am missing something.

oh i think Exploded will be considered as a Modifier only when it is preceded by "that".Am i correct?


Hello vamshiande

No problem. I'm glad to help. You missed the structure a bit. "Exploded" is a verb, NOT Verb-ed modifier. Please note: after "that", we use a CLAUSE, thus "exploded" can't be a verb-ed modifier.

Hope it makes sense.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2013
Posts: 932
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Followers: 111

Kudos [?]: 700 [0], given: 546

Reviews Badge
Re: Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Mar 2014, 07:48
The error which I can identify is “exploding” which modified “full moon” and there is no verb there.

So on the basis of that, I have eliminated Options A) , C) . Option D) has comma + verbing modifier so should either present “How” or results – both are not applicable from context.

Now in Option E) I have a doubt what “that” modifies.

I guess “that” modified star and not full moon as “as bright as the full moon” modifies the star and as per the article noun-modifiers-can-modify-slightly-far-away-noun-135868.html, it should modify the star.

In that case, the Option E) looks ok. Can you please clarify?
_________________

Thanks,
Kinjal
Struggling with GMAT ? Experience http://www.gmatify.com/
My Debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267.html#p1449379
My Application Experience : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267-40.html#p1516961
My Linkedin Handle: https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=AAIAAAbtjagB9G1MrEzTRYDRGroXuSmZO0ZhoK0

Please click on Kudos, if you think the post is helpful

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1966
Followers: 1911

Kudos [?]: 6262 [1] , given: 253

Re: Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Mar 2014, 04:22
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
kinjiGC wrote:
The error which I can identify is “exploding” which modified “full moon” and there is no verb there.

So on the basis of that, I have eliminated Options A) , C) . Option D) has comma + verbing modifier so should either present “How” or results – both are not applicable from context.

Now in Option E) I have a doubt what “that” modifies.

I guess “that” modified star and not full moon as “as bright as the full moon” modifies the star and as per the article noun-modifiers-can-modify-slightly-far-away-noun-135868.html, it should modify the star.

In that case, the Option E) looks ok. Can you please clarify?


Hi there,

Thank you for posting your query here. :)

As the article tells you, a good way to test whether a modifier can 'jump over' the preceding modifier is to check whether the preceding modifier can be placed anywhere else. If it can, then the second modifier can't 'jump over' the first. In this sentence, "that was as bright as the full moon" can't be placed anywhere else, since it's clearly referring to the star. So, you're right: there's no issue with this modifier.

The problem with this option is that it destroys the intended meaning of the sentence. According to the intended meaning of the original sentence, "emitting" was the result of "exploding". The star exploded, resulting in the emission of dazzling radiation. This cause-and-effect relationship no longer exists when we turn "emitted" into a verb and join the two words using "and". In this context, "and" only tells use that two actions were performed by the star: it exploded, and it emitted radiation. It doesn't tell us that the explosion caused the emission of radiation, and thus distorts the intended meaning of the sentence.

I hope this helps to clarify your doubt!

Regards,
Meghna
_________________












1158 reviews | '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 8842
Followers: 777

Kudos [?]: 160 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Apr 2015, 02:26
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Jan 2015
Posts: 131
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 260

Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jun 2015, 23:36
quiet888 wrote:
Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340.000 years ago, emitting dazzling radiation that could have disrupted Earth's protective ozone layer and sunburned our Stone Age ancestors.

A. that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
B. that a star as bright as the full moon exploded into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
C. of a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago and that it emitted
D. of a star as bright as the full moon, exploding into view 340,000 years ago and emitting
E. of a star as bright as the full moon that exploded into view 340,000 years ago and that emitted


Okay, OA is B

But isn't 'emitting' in B a bit ambiguous, as it can refer either to 'star' or the subject of the main clause 'astronomers'?

(we know that -ing participles preceded by a comma after a clause modify the subject+verb of that clause)

Can anybody help me with this issue?
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 290
GMAT 1: 620 Q44 V31
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 3: 610 Q47 V28
GMAT 4: 700 Q50 V34
GMAT 5: 700 Q49 V36
GMAT 6: 690 Q48 V35
GMAT 7: 750 Q49 V42
GMAT 8: 730 Q50 V39
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 82 [1] , given: 2404

Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jun 2015, 20:32
1
This post received
KUDOS
apolo wrote:
quiet888 wrote:
Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340.000 years ago, emitting dazzling radiation that could have disrupted Earth's protective ozone layer and sunburned our Stone Age ancestors.

A. that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
B. that a star as bright as the full moon exploded into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
C. of a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago and that it emitted
D. of a star as bright as the full moon, exploding into view 340,000 years ago and emitting
E. of a star as bright as the full moon that exploded into view 340,000 years ago and that emitted


Okay, OA is B

But isn't 'emitting' in B a bit ambiguous, as it can refer either to 'star' or the subject of the main clause 'astronomers'?

(we know that -ing participles preceded by a comma after a clause modify the subject+verb of that clause)

Can anybody help me with this issue?


Here is an answer: https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/astronomers-have-uncovered-evidence-that-a-star-that-t4483.html#p36695
Expert Post
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 3947
Followers: 241

Kudos [?]: 2514 [0], given: 97

Re: Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jun 2015, 20:51
Expert's post
apolo wrote:
quiet888 wrote:
Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340.000 years ago, emitting dazzling radiation that could have disrupted Earth's protective ozone layer and sunburned our Stone Age ancestors.

A. that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
B. that a star as bright as the full moon exploded into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
C. of a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago and that it emitted
D. of a star as bright as the full moon, exploding into view 340,000 years ago and emitting
E. of a star as bright as the full moon that exploded into view 340,000 years ago and that emitted


Okay, OA is B

But isn't 'emitting' in B a bit ambiguous, as it can refer either to 'star' or the subject of the main clause 'astronomers'?

(we know that -ing participles preceded by a comma after a clause modify the subject+verb of that clause)

Can anybody help me with this issue?


Hi,
emitting is not ambiguous and refers to entire action/clause " a star as bright as the full moon exploded into view 340,000 years ago"..
_________________

Absolute modulus :http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372
Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Jan 2015
Posts: 131
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 260

Re: Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2015, 01:35
TooLong150 wrote:
apolo wrote:
quiet888 wrote:
Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340.000 years ago, emitting dazzling radiation that could have disrupted Earth's protective ozone layer and sunburned our Stone Age ancestors.

A. that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
B. that a star as bright as the full moon exploded into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
C. of a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago and that it emitted
D. of a star as bright as the full moon, exploding into view 340,000 years ago and emitting
E. of a star as bright as the full moon that exploded into view 340,000 years ago and that emitted


Okay, OA is B

But isn't 'emitting' in B a bit ambiguous, as it can refer either to 'star' or the subject of the main clause 'astronomers'?


(we know that -ing participles preceded by a comma after a clause modify the subject+verb of that clause)

Can anybody help me with this issue?


Here is an answer: https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/astronomers-have-uncovered-evidence-that-a-star-that-t4483.html#p36695


Thanks TooLong150, great help.
Re: Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as   [#permalink] 29 Jun 2015, 01:35

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 22 posts ] 

    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Astronomers have theorized that anceer 0 05 Jul 2014, 03:04
4 Experts publish their posts in the topic By studying linguistics, researchers have uncovered lexical feruz77 4 27 Oct 2010, 03:03
2 Astronomers studying the newly discovered star say that it WhyabloodyMBA 7 10 Jul 2009, 13:01
Astronomers studying the newly discovered star say that it spiridon 4 13 Nov 2008, 08:26
Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as misterJJ2u 1 03 Jul 2007, 10:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.