Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Oct 2014, 23:13

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Astronomers theorize that a black hole forms when a

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 31 Mar 2006
Posts: 69
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Astronomers theorize that a black hole forms when a [#permalink] New post 29 Apr 2006, 19:48
Complete discussion at the below mentioned link
astronomers-theorize-that-a-black-hole-forms-when-a-massive-147401.html#p1183399



Astronomers theorize that a black
hole forms when a massive object
shrinks catastrophically under its own
gravity, leaving only a gravitational
(5)field so strong that nothing escapes it.
Astronomers must infer the existence
of black holes, which are invisible,
from their gravitational influence on
the visible bodies surrounding them.
(10)For example, observations indicate
that gas clouds in galaxy M87 are
whirling unusually fast about the gal-
axy’s center. Most astronomers
believe that the large concentration
(15)of mass at the galaxy’s center is a
black hole whose gravity is causing
the gas to whirl. A few skeptics have
argued that the concentration of mass
necessary to explain the speed of the
(20)whirling gas is not necessarily a black
hole: the concentration in M87 might
be a cluster of a billion or so dim stars.
The same hypothesis might have
been applied to the galaxy NGC 4258,
(25)but the notion of such a cluster’s
existing in NGC 4258 was severely
undermined when astronomers mea-
sured the speed of a ring of dust and
gas rotating close to the galaxy’s
(30)center. From its speed, they calcu-
lated that the core’s density is more
than 40 times the density estimated
for any other galaxy. If the center of
NGC 4258 were a star cluster, the
(35)stars would be so closely spaced
that collisions between individual
stars would have long ago torn the
cluster apart.


Which of the following, if true, would most clearly undermine the possible explanation for the whirling gas in M87 that is mentioned in the last sentence of the first paragraph?

A The stars in a star cluster at the center of M87 could exert a strong gravitational force without tearing the cluster apart.

B A cluster of stars at the center would preclude the existence of certain other astronomical phenomena that have been observed at the center of M87.

C The stars within many existing galaxies, such as NGC 4258, are more closely spaced than are the stars within the core of M87.

D Only one other galaxy has been observed to contain gas clouds whirling about its center as they do about the core of M87.

E The gravitational force of a cluster of a billion or so dim stars would be sufficient to cause a whirling ring of gas and dust to collect around the center of a galaxy.
Kaplan Promo CodeKnewton GMAT Discount CodesGMAT Pill GMAT Discount Codes
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 May 2006
Posts: 56
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 27 Jun 2006, 18:02
B?
_________________

Learn and let others learn

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1741
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 27 Jun 2006, 20:11
Will go with B too.

But I have no idea where the first para ends so assumed that we basically have to under the skeptics argument.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Jun 2006
Posts: 69
Location: Hyderabad, India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 27 Jun 2006, 22:13
B. This answer choice gives an alternative explanation and undermines the explanation.
_________________

Hema

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 297
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Re: RC galaxy and black hole [#permalink] New post 15 May 2008, 08:01
A few skeptics have argued that the concentration of mass necessary to explain the speed of the whirling gas is not necessarily a black hole: the concentration in M87 might be a cluster of a billion or so dim stars.

We are asked to undermine the explanation that in M87 wind may be due to a cluster of a billion or so dim stars, Now hows that B undermine that?

B. A cluster of stars at the center would preclude the existence of certain other astronomical phenomena that have been observed at the center of M87.

***EDITED****
BTW, OA is given as A which obviously does not make sense.

Last edited by mbawaters on 15 May 2008, 08:21, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 133
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Re: RC galaxy and black hole [#permalink] New post 15 May 2008, 08:16
Most astronomers
believe that the large concentration
(15)of mass at the galaxy’s center is a
black hole whose gravity is causing
the gas to whirl.

To undermine this explanation - we either need an alternative expl that causes the gases to whirl or somehow prove that there is no blackhole at the center of the galaxy.


Which of the following, if true, would most clearly undermine the possible explanation for the whirling gas in M87 that is mentioned in the last sentence of the first paragraph?

A The stars in a star cluster at the center of M87 could exert a strong gravitational force without tearing the cluster apart.
>> doesnt tell us if that gravitational force can cause these gases to whirl.

B A cluster of stars at the center would preclude the existence of certain other astronomical phenomena that have been observed at the center of M87.
>> that other astronomical phenomena may not be referring to "black holes" - this choice is too broad.

C The stars within many existing galaxies, such as NGC 4258, are more closely spaced than are the stars within the core of M87.
>> Irrelevant.

D Only one other galaxy has been observed to contain gas clouds whirling about its center as they do about the core of M87.
>> Irrelevant.

E The gravitational force of a cluster of a billion or so dim stars would be sufficient to cause a whirling ring of gas and dust to collect around the center of a galaxy.
>> This is suggesting that we dont need a black hole to create the type of gravitational force.

[/quote]
Re: RC galaxy and black hole   [#permalink] 15 May 2008, 08:16
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Astronomers have theorized that anceer 0 05 Jul 2014, 02:04
5 Astronomers theorize that a black hole forms when a massive roopika2990 7 17 Feb 2013, 03:20
Astronomers theorize that a black hole forms when a massive goalsnr 4 09 Jul 2008, 22:34
Astronomers theorize that a black hole forms when a massive goalsnr 3 09 Jul 2008, 22:10
SC: BlackHole IWT801 6 19 Dec 2005, 22:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Astronomers theorize that a black hole forms when a

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.