At a recent meeting on environmental threats off the coast of the state of Maine, most participants favored uniform controls on the quality of food fed to salmon species in fish farms located along the coast of the state.
Such controls were overwhelmingly supported without regard to whether or not specific environmental damage could be linked to a particular type of food being used. What must, of course, be shown, in order to mitigate the risk of excessively restrictive controls, is that
A) all agreed upon controls that are uniform in nature will be implemented without any delay................this cannot mitigate excessive damage.
B) all fish foods that will be the subject of controls are known to actually cause environmental damage off the coast of Maine...........In this case restrictive controls are serving the purpose and there is minimal damage
C) the meeting participants favoring uniform controls are primarily from an industry that completes with the salmon farmers................this is completely out of scope
D) all of the chemicals that are ingredients in some
of the controlled substances are known to cause environmental damage....................some spoils the sentence here. only few cases are addressed.
E) the environmental damage that has historically been caused by the dangerous fish foods is not reversible in the foreseeable future, if ever.................I could not decipher this properly. appeared quite ridiculous.
The only time you can lose is when you give up. Try hard and you will suceed.
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated
When you post a question Pls. Provide its source & TAG your questions
Avoid posting from unreliable sources.