|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1384
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
90
[0], given: 10
|
At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that [#permalink]
 03 Jul 2008, 19:28
Question Stats:
28% (01:09) correct
71% (00:46) wrong based on 0 sessions
1. At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that forbid the use in speech or print of language that “offends” or “insults” the members of any group, especially women and racial, ethnic, and religious minorities. Although these regulations are defended in the name of “democracy,” they restrict freedom of speech and the press in a way that opposes the true spirit of democracy.
The argument above attempts to prove its case primarily by
(A) impugning the credentials of an opponent
(B) providing examples that support a theoretical principle
(C) taking advantage of inconsistencies in the definition of “democracy”
(D) revealing a contradiction in an opposing point of view
(E) appealing to the patriotic feelings of its audience
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 276
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
16
[0], given: 0
|
goalsnr wrote: 1. At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that forbid the use in speech or print of language that “offends” or “insults” the members of any group, especially women and racial, ethnic, and religious minorities. Although these regulations are defended in the name of “democracy,” they restrict freedom of speech and the press in a way that opposes the true spirit of democracy.
The argument above attempts to prove its case primarily by
(A) impugning the credentials of an opponent
(B) providing examples that support a theoretical principle
(C) taking advantage of inconsistencies in the definition of “democracy”
(D) revealing a contradiction in an opposing point of view
(E) appealing to the patriotic feelings of its audience IMO C. Cause thats exactly what the author is trying to accomplish. On one hand we have a democratic world that 'protects fundamental rights of people' (so that people don't feel violated) at the same time on the other hand it gives 'freedom of expression' to people which could when used in a racist way affect the first right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1384
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
90
[0], given: 10
|
Ashwin_Mohan wrote: goalsnr wrote: 1. At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that forbid the use in speech or print of language that “offends” or “insults” the members of any group, especially women and racial, ethnic, and religious minorities. Although these regulations are defended in the name of “democracy,” they restrict freedom of speech and the press in a way that opposes the true spirit of democracy.
The argument above attempts to prove its case primarily by
(A) impugning the credentials of an opponent
(B) providing examples that support a theoretical principle
(C) taking advantage of inconsistencies in the definition of “democracy”
(D) revealing a contradiction in an opposing point of view
(E) appealing to the patriotic feelings of its audience IMO C. Cause thats exactly what the author is trying to accomplish. On one hand we have a democratic world that 'protects fundamental rights of people' (so that people don't feel violated) at the same time on the other hand it gives 'freedom of expression' to people which could when used in a racist way affect the first right. Nope!!! -Democracy is not defined in the stimulus
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 747
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
65
[0], given: 0
|
goalsnr wrote: 1. At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that forbid the use in speech or print of language that “offends” or “insults” the members of any group, especially women and racial, ethnic, and religious minorities. Although these regulations are defended in the name of “democracy,” they restrict freedom of speech and the press in a way that opposes the true spirit of democracy.
The argument above attempts to prove its case primarily by
(A) impugning the credentials of an opponent
(B) providing examples that support a theoretical principle
(C) taking advantage of inconsistencies in the definition of “democracy”
(D) revealing a contradiction in an opposing point of view
(E) appealing to the patriotic feelings of its audience B for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1384
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
90
[0], given: 10
|
alpha_plus_gamma wrote: goalsnr wrote: 1. At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that forbid the use in speech or print of language that “offends” or “insults” the members of any group, especially women and racial, ethnic, and religious minorities. Although these regulations are defended in the name of “democracy,” they restrict freedom of speech and the press in a way that opposes the true spirit of democracy.
The argument above attempts to prove its case primarily by
(A) impugning the credentials of an opponent
(B) providing examples that support a theoretical principle
(C) taking advantage of inconsistencies in the definition of “democracy”
(D) revealing a contradiction in an opposing point of view
(E) appealing to the patriotic feelings of its audience B for me. Nope !!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Student
Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Posts: 228
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
54
[0], given: 3
|
Its D.
these regulations are defended in the name of democracy
these regulations actually violate the true spirit of democracy
contradiction :p
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 285
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
20
[0], given: 0
|
goalsnr wrote: 1. At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that forbid the use in speech or print of language that “offends” or “insults” the members of any group, especially women and racial, ethnic, and religious minorities. Although these regulations are defended in the name of “democracy,” they restrict freedom of speech and the press in a way that opposes the true spirit of democracy.
The argument above attempts to prove its case primarily by
(A) impugning the credentials of an opponent
(B) providing examples that support a theoretical principle
(C) taking advantage of inconsistencies in the definition of “democracy”
(D) revealing a contradiction in an opposing point of view
(E) appealing to the patriotic feelings of its audience IMO D for this one I can explain if my answer is correct
_________________
The world is continuous, but the mind is discrete
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1612
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
53
[0], given: 2
|
I would say D. He is trying to make his point by showing how there is a contradiction in the use of 'democracy'
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 276
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
16
[0], given: 0
|
This was a tough one....Since we all know at sub-conscious levels what democracy means, it makes use of that advantage. Yea it must be D, and literally for the same reason I gave before  Where did you pick this question up from goalsnr??
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 22 Apr 2008
Posts: 15
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
goalsnr wrote: 1. At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that forbid the use in speech or print of language that “offends” or “insults” the members of any group, especially women and racial, ethnic, and religious minorities. Although these regulations are defended in the name of “democracy,” they restrict freedom of speech and the press in a way that opposes the true spirit of democracy.
The argument above attempts to prove its case primarily by
(A) impugning the credentials of an opponent
(B) providing examples that support a theoretical principle
(C) taking advantage of inconsistencies in the definition of “democracy”
(D) revealing a contradiction in an opposing point of view
(E) appealing to the patriotic feelings of its audience I think it's D because the last sentence offers a view of democracy that contradicts the previous sentence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1384
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
90
[0], given: 10
|
jasonc wrote: Its D.
these regulations are defended in the name of democracy
these regulations actually violate the true spirit of democracy
contradiction :p Bingo!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1384
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
90
[0], given: 10
|
Ashwin_Mohan wrote: This was a tough one....Since we all know at sub-conscious levels what democracy means, it makes use of that advantage. Yea it must be D, and literally for the same reason I gave before Where did you pick this question up from goalsnr?? 1000CR
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1384
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
90
[0], given: 10
|
OA is D
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1442
Followers: 28
Kudos [?]:
152
[0], given: 1
|
B & C are tempting.
C appeals to the out of scope answer, but we simply cannot say that as D is not defined in the stimulus.
I ruled out B because we clearly see a lack of support
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 289
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
37
[0], given: 9
|
goalsnr wrote: 1. At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that forbid the use in speech or print of language that “offends” or “insults” the members of any group, especially women and racial, ethnic, and religious minorities. Although these regulations are defended in the name of “democracy,” they restrict freedom of speech and the press in a way that opposes the true spirit of democracy.
The argument above attempts to prove its case primarily by
(A) impugning the credentials of an opponent
(B) providing examples that support a theoretical principle
(C) taking advantage of inconsistencies in the definition of “democracy”
(D) revealing a contradiction in an opposing point of view
(E) appealing to the patriotic feelings of its audience Democracy gives us the freedom of speech. We are free to express our feelings about an issue. College forbids certain kind of speeches, in the name of Democracy, which are insulting in nature. Thus the contradiction. ANDD a clear opposing point of view as IN D
_________________
If you know what you're worth, then go out and get what you're worth. But you gotta be willing to take the hits, and not pointing fingers saying you ain't where you wanna be because of anybody! Cowards do that and You're better than that!
The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short; the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.
Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.
Failure establishes only this, that our determination to succeed was not strong enough.
Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1400
Followers: 8
Kudos [?]:
84
[0], given: 10
|
the final line in the argument is doing the same,bringing out a contradiction. D it is.
_________________
Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 23 Aug 2011
Posts: 47
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 4
|
vd wrote: goalsnr wrote: 1. At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that forbid the use in speech or print of language that “offends” or “insults” the members of any group, especially women and racial, ethnic, and religious minorities. Although these regulations are defended in the name of “democracy,” they restrict freedom of speech and the press in a way that opposes the true spirit of democracy.
The argument above attempts to prove its case primarily by
(A) impugning the credentials of an opponent
(B) providing examples that support a theoretical principle
(C) taking advantage of inconsistencies in the definition of “democracy”
(D) revealing a contradiction in an opposing point of view
(E) appealing to the patriotic feelings of its audience IMO D for this one I can explain if my answer is correct can you explain it Y. and what the last line actually mean " Although these regulations are defended in the name of “democracy,” they restrict freedom of speech and the press in a way that opposes the true spirit of democracy. The argument above attempts to prove its case primarily by" Thanks 2 explain:)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar topics |
Author |
Replies |
Last post |
|
Similar
Topics:
|
 |
|
|
At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that
|
ywilfred |
8 |
05 Sep 2005, 08:40 |
|
|
|
|
At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that
|
old_dream_1976 |
6 |
21 Dec 2005, 15:59 |
|
|
|
|
At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that
|
MBA2ran |
8 |
24 Nov 2006, 00:26 |
|
|
|
|
At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that
|
Nihit |
9 |
01 Sep 2008, 08:49 |
 |
4
|
 |
At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that
|
ritula |
24 |
01 Mar 2009, 01:47 |
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|
close
