|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1304
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
59
[0], given: 0
|
At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that [#permalink]
01 Mar 2009, 01:47
Question Stats:
61% (01:46) correct
38% (00:47) wrong based on 156 sessions
At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that forbid the use in speech or print of language that “offends” or “insults” the members of any group, especially women and racial, ethnic, and religious minorities. Although these regulations are defended in the name of “democracy,” they restrict freedom of speech and the press in a way that opposes the true spirit of democracy. The argument above attempts to prove its case primarily by (A) impugning the credentials of an opponent (B) providing examples that support a theoretical principle (C) taking advantage of inconsistencies in the definition of “democracy” (D) revealing a contradiction in an opposing point of view (E) appealing to the patriotic feelings of its audience
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 889
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
90
[0], given: 7
|
D. The argument is using a contrast to make a point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 22 Jan 2009
Posts: 6
Schools: rowan university
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
D.The argument is using a contrast to make a point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2008
Posts: 432
Schools: Kellogg Class of 2012
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
55
[0], given: 4
|
Agree with D
Cheers, Unplugged
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1304
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
59
[0], given: 0
|
OA is D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 309
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
17
[0], given: 7
|
can u pls dissect the case with 2 point of views and inbuild contradictions ..will help me to understand it . Thanks in advance .
_________________
"CEO in making"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2009
Posts: 86
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 2
|
Can anybody please explain why not C?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Posts: 180
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
21
[1] , given: 0
|
1
This post received KUDOS
At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that forbid the use in speech or print of language that “offends” or “insults” the members of any group, especially women and racial, ethnic, and religious minorities. Although these regulations are defended in the name of “democracy,” they restrict freedom of speech and the press in a way that opposes the true spirit of democracy.
The argument above attempts to prove its case primarily by (A) impugning the credentials of an opponent (B) providing examples that support a theoretical principle (C) taking advantage of inconsistencies in the definition of “democracy” (D) revealing a contradiction in an opposing point of view (E) appealing to the patriotic feelings of its audience
Conclusion: regulations have been imposed that forbid the use in speech or print of language Evidence: Although these regulations are defended in the name of “democracy Regulations restrict X and Y in a way that opposes the true spirit of democracy
Clearly the argument is proved by second portion. The although clause in evidence should be avoided.
Answer should be D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2009
Posts: 86
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 2
|
thanks. +1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2009
Posts: 52
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 4
|
I am not convinced with the Answer D.
Whats the "opposing point of view" here ? ".. these regulations are defended in the name of “democracy" would mean that the regulations are protected/supported by democratic rules.. so this is actually a supporting view.. the fact that it does have a contradiction is a different thing.
(D) should have read "revealing a contradiction in a supporting point of view". Wotsay ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Student
Joined: 05 Jan 2010
Posts: 377
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
86
[1] , given: 3439
|
1
This post received KUDOS
I see what you're saying about C but I don't think it's the best answer here for a couple of reasons. "Democracy" isn't defined by its protection of free speech or free press but "the spirit of democracy" could be. Secondly, for the passage to be taking advantage of inconsistencies in the definition of democracy, it would need to call two separate definitions of "democracy" that clearly contradict each other. I don't think the passage is attempting to make that distinction. Instead, I think, its invoking the general understanding of "the spirit of democracy" and arguing partial censorship opposes that concept.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2009
Posts: 52
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 4
|
coakleym wrote: I see what you're saying about C but I don't think it's the best answer here for a couple of reasons. "Democracy" isn't defined by its protection of free speech or free press but "the spirit of democracy" could be. Secondly, for the passage to be taking advantage of inconsistencies in the definition of democracy, it would need to call two separate definitions of "democracy" that clearly contradict each other. I don't think the passage is attempting to make that distinction. Instead, I think, its invoking the general understanding of "the spirit of democracy" and arguing partial censorship opposes that concept. C is not convincing either. I think none of the answers is a clear winner. A un-gmat like question would you say?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Student
Joined: 05 Jan 2010
Posts: 377
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
86
[0], given: 3439
|
kaptain wrote: C is not convincing either. I think none of the answers is a clear winner. A un-gmat like question would you say? Not sure. I like D and think its the best answer to the question but yeah, I agree, its definitely not the most straightforward of CR questions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 14 Aug 2009
Posts: 56
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
12
[2] , given: 29
|
2
This post received KUDOS
pmal04 wrote: Can anybody please explain why not C? C is not good because Democracy is not defined in the paragraph. C is outside the scope of the question. The question writer is hoping you use outside knowledge and information. You can only use the information provided. i hope that helps.
_________________
My will shall shape the future. Whether I fail or succeed shall be no man's doing but my own. I am the force; I can clear any obstacle before me or I can be lost in the maze. My choice; my responsibility; win or lose, only I hold the key to my destiny - Elaine Maxwell
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 154
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 1
|
its D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tuck Thread Master
Joined: 20 Aug 2009
Posts: 314
Location: Tbilisi, Georgia
Schools: Stanford (in), Tuck (WL), Wharton (ding), Cornell (in)
Followers: 7
Kudos [?]:
69
[0], given: 69
|
Somehow I think the correct ans should be (C):
Regulators say that any offensive or insulting language should be forbidden in the name of democracy.
Author of the argument contends that in no way should the freedom of speech be restricted, because doing so would oppose true spirit of democracy
Regulators and author have different perceptions of what democracy might mean.
Author uses ambiguous nature of term "democracy" to prove his point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 10 Feb 2010
Posts: 197
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
23
[0], given: 6
|
pmal04 wrote: Can anybody please explain why not C? The question if anything is expaining the inconsistencies in "freedom of speech" than in democracy --
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 98
Location: Bangalore, India
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
10
[0], given: 2
|
kaptain wrote: I am not convinced with the Answer D.
Whats the "opposing point of view" here ? ".. these regulations are defended in the name of “democracy" would mean that the regulations are protected/supported by democratic rules.. so this is actually a supporting view.. the fact that it does have a contradiction is a different thing.
(D) should have read "revealing a contradiction in a supporting point of view". Wotsay ? The author clearly supports that there should be “no” restriction on speech or print of language. The opposing point of view is what is actually implemented at many colleges today (there ‘are’ restrictions). The author reveals contradiction in that opposing point of view (by explaining democracy).
_________________
Thanks, Ashish GMAT - 99th Pecentile, MBA-ISB Faculty @ EducationAisle http://www.EducationAisle.com
Read testimonials of our students who made it to top schools (IIMs, ISB, Darden and XLRI, among others): http://EducationAisle.com/testimonials.html
No "kudos" are required if you find this post useful; absorbing this learning and getting a great score would be your best gratitude.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2010
Posts: 251
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 16
|
D is better than C. too bad I selected C
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verbal GMAT Forum Moderator
Status: Preparing for the another shot...!
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1338
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GMAT 1: 720 Q V
GPA: 3.75
Followers: 69
Kudos [?]:
328
[0], given: 53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar topics |
Author |
Replies |
Last post |
|
Similar Topics:
|
|
|
|
At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that
|
GMATPIPO |
7 |
30 Dec 2004, 01:54 |
|
|
|
At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that
|
Antmavel |
4 |
24 Mar 2005, 07:31 |
|
|
|
At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that
|
ywilfred |
8 |
05 Sep 2005, 08:40 |
|
|
|
At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that
|
old_dream_1976 |
6 |
21 Dec 2005, 15:59 |
|
|
|
At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that
|
goalsnr |
16 |
03 Jul 2008, 19:28 |
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Vercules, Legendaddy, noboru, Marcab, metallicafan, rajeevrks27, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, souvik101990, doe007, MacFauz, PTK, carcass, kissthegmat, Narenn
|