Attached. Couldnt really understand it : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 10 Dec 2016, 23:54

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Attached. Couldnt really understand it

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 347
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Attached. Couldnt really understand it [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2004, 17:16
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Attached. Couldnt really understand it.
Attachments

CR.doc [59 KiB]

If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Director
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 893
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2004, 17:45
E it is. 1 min.

A - out of scope
B - Au contraire choice. Because both the speakers should see a drop in funding.
D- No again

C- Tempting choice. This may be the reason that one of the speakers is referring to increased funding in an univ while the other sees a decrease in funding.

E- Another good choice. The reason is this choice can be as Funding = 2/3rd by govt + some through subcontracting work. May be the reason why one of them sees the decreased govt funding while other sees the overall funding having not diminished (as that is coming from the subcontracting work).

I will lean towards E - under the presumption that defence contracts are still 'govt stuff'.
Senior Manager
Affiliations: CFA Level 2
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 266
Location: Hanoi
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2004, 18:04
Less than 1 min & B. I will explain if I'm right.
_________________

"Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you'r gonna get"

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4302
Followers: 39

Kudos [?]: 419 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2004, 18:19
I'm with B. 1min15.
A) does nothing to explain the discrepancy b/w governement grant vs government funding
B) This gives a possible explanation. If grant amounts increased but funding was decreased, and both are mutually exclusive, this could explain how the former could have increased while the latter decreased.
C) same as A
D) out of scope
E) This does not necessarily mean that defense contractors transfered amount in terms of \$ has increased. It only says that the proportion increased. What if they used to subcontract 50M out of 500M (10% of their business value) but now subcontract 50M out of 250M (20% of their business value)?
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 May 2003
Posts: 424
Location: Aus
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2004, 18:20
B.

Statement I :
Government grants have risen over the past 10 years

II:
Government funding of scientific research is low compare to ten years ago.

Only B provides reason for both the statements
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 347
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2004, 19:20
Yes OA is B.
First of all, I could not understand statement I and II . Now, first says that government grant to universities " for scientific research" has increased. Second says that government funding for scientific research has decreased. Now, isnt "government grant to universities for scientific research" the same thing as "government funding for scientific research".
What am i missing here?
I construed that government funds to universities increased but within universities, investing for scientific research decreased and one reason could be increased salaries for technicians as explained by answer choice D.
I think Iam getting confused here because of wording.. ????????
Manager
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 218
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2004, 00:47
crackgmat, please note that grants is only a PART of the funding

So, if grants have increased but the whole funding has decreased then it must be that SOME OTHER PART of funding has decreased substantially

B gives as that part - government contracts
Director
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 577
Location: San Jose, CA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2004, 10:30
1.5 Mins
B for sure
grants and funding are mutually exclusive
Director
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 893
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2004, 10:58
I was awake the whole of last night and I am sure the this has shown in my answering this CR. Totally out of my mind. Pls allow me guys....

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4302
Followers: 39

Kudos [?]: 419 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2004, 11:15
Yes, it happens to me too when I stay up too late trying to answer CR questions... I'm not all there.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

[#permalink] 09 Aug 2004, 11:15
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 Understanding Causal Arguments 0 13 Sep 2013, 14:03
26 Understanding Causal Arguments 2 13 Sep 2013, 14:03
Important one for me to understand 5 05 Apr 2012, 20:57
1 See the attachment 7 19 Apr 2010, 01:44
4 There is old post as well...but couldnt really follow the 20 28 Jun 2009, 19:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Attached. Couldnt really understand it

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.