NEW HERE? LEARN MORE
closeclose
Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 04:49 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 04:49
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New posts
New comers' posts

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel

Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the el

SORT BY:
Date
Kudos
   1   2   3   4   5   
Tags:
Difficulty: 655-705 Levelx   Meaning/Logical Predicationx   Modifiersx   Parallelismx   Verb Tense/Formx                                    
Find Similar Topics 
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
L
NandishSS
Director
Director
Joined: 06 Jan 2015
Posts: 738
Own Kudos [?]: 1586 [0]
Given Kudos: 579
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GPA: 3.35
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the el [#permalink] New post   09 May 2020, 03:28
Quote:
Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel.

(A) that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving

(B) that has suggested the elephant descended from an aquatic animal, its trunk originally evolving

(C) suggesting that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal with its trunk originally evolved

(D) to suggest that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal and its trunk originally evolved

(E) to suggest that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally evolved


HI GMATNinja, EMPOWERgmatVerbal, generis, jennpt, egmat VeritasPrepErika, GMATRockstar, TestPrepUnlimited , MentorTutoring

Can you throw some light on evolved and evolving? Are evolved and evolving both correct this context as the trunk is already evolved.
User avatar
B
GMATRockstar
Tutor
Joined: 21 Apr 2014
Posts: 91
Own Kudos [?]: 743 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the el [#permalink] New post   09 May 2020, 03:47
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
NandishSS wrote:
Quote:
Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel.

(A) that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving

(B) that has suggested the elephant descended from an aquatic animal, its trunk originally evolving

(C) suggesting that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal with its trunk originally evolved

(D) to suggest that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal and its trunk originally evolved

(E) to suggest that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally evolved


HI GMATNinja, EMPOWERgmatVerbal, generis, jennpt, egmat VeritasPrepErika, GMATRockstar, TestPrepUnlimited , MentorTutoring

Can you throw some light on evolved and evolving? Are evolved and evolving both correct this context as the trunk is already evolved.


To me, it's as simple as this question: what do I think the GMAT wants me to notice?

"and" is such a common marker for Parallelism. Let's look at the structure of (A):

SUBJECT - VERB - NOUN - THAT - VERB - THAT - NOUN - VERB.... AND.... NOUN (its trunk)
Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving...

So...let's highlight the other NOUNS that could be parallel with "its trunk":

SUBJECT - VERB - NOUN - THAT - VERB - THAT - NOUN - VERB - THAT - VERB.... AND.... NOUN...
Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving...

This first option would have the meaning that embryologists found two things: EVIDENCE and ITS TRUNK. That's silly. They didn't find a trunk! ;)

The second option would have the meaning that suggests "the trunk originally evolving". This verb doesn't make sense. We cannot say, "The evidence suggests the elephant IS DESCENDED....and its trunk EVOLVING. These are not parallel verb tenses!! We know that "is descended" is simple present tense. To be parallel, we would need "evolving" to ALSO be present-tense. Perhaps, "is evolving" or "evolves."

Neither of the potential interpretations make logical sense, because "its" clearly refers to "the elephant". We cannot achieve parallelism in (A), either through NOUNS or VERBS, so we know that (A) cannot be correct, because there is no way to reconcile it with the rest of the sentence and make it parallel and have a clear, logical meaning.

Also, if I wanted to use the word "that" to create parallelism, we would need to use the idiom THAT X AND Y, or the idiom THAT X and THAT Y. It doesn't work here.

In (E)... THAT the elephant descended...and THAT its trunk evolved... is nicely parallel. Both have a nice NOUN-VERB structure preceded by the relative pronoun "that" and both use past tense. It also uses the "THAT X...and THAT Y" idiom that is so often correct on the GMAT.

(E) works on every level: grammar, meaning, and style. :-)
avatar
L
AndrewN
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Posts: 3512
Own Kudos [?]: 6858 [1]
Given Kudos: 500
Re: Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the el [#permalink] New post   09 May 2020, 11:02
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
NandishSS wrote:
Quote:
Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel.

(A) that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving

(B) that has suggested the elephant descended from an aquatic animal, its trunk originally evolving

(C) suggesting that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal with its trunk originally evolved

(D) to suggest that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal and its trunk originally evolved

(E) to suggest that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally evolved


HI GMATNinja, EMPOWERgmatVerbal, generis, jennpt, egmat VeritasPrepErika, GMATRockstar, TestPrepUnlimited , MentorTutoring

Can you throw some light on evolved and evolving? Are evolved and evolving both correct this context as the trunk is already evolved.

Hello, NandishSS. Although (A) and (B) are easy to eliminate on other grounds, it is not the inclusion of evolving alone that seals the deal for either option. Simply put, the former answer joins two items together using and but places a comma before the conjunction, the construct used when joining two independent clauses. There is no second independent clause, however, since evolving is not acting as a verb. Choice (B) is the more interesting of the two, in my eyes, since an its phrase can be used to modify the noun of the main clause. The problem in this particular sentence is that its appears to refer to the aquatic animal just before the comma, rather than to the earlier elephant. Consider the following sentence, though, in which the preposition with could or could not appear at the head of the sentence:

[With] its mainsail flying away in a sudden gust of wind, the ship drifted asea for hours before striking the rocks of the shoreline.

I just wanted to point out that an its + verb-ing construct is not incorrect by default. But here, in the sentence about the elephant, neither answer with such an element works.

I hope that helps shed a little more light on the situation. Thank you for thinking to tag me.

- Andrew
User avatar
S
draftpunk
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2017
Posts: 57
Own Kudos [?]: 46 [0]
Given Kudos: 217
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the el [#permalink] New post   18 May 2020, 19:18
GMATNinja

Can you please provide some clarification on the use of the second "that" and whether it is need to maintain parallelism? I have seen contradictory responses in this thread as well as multiple other threads on this site.

For example: [I] suggest that [he does X] and that [he does Y].

Is the second "that" only necessary when the object is repeated? Thanks!
User avatar
L
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6920
Own Kudos [?]: 63664 [1]
Given Kudos: 1773
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the el [#permalink] New post   24 May 2020, 13:54
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
costcosized wrote:
GMATNinja

Can you please provide some clarification on the use of the second "that" and whether it is need to maintain parallelism? I have seen contradictory responses in this thread as well as multiple other threads on this site.

For example: [I] suggest that [he does X] and that [he does Y].

Is the second "that" only necessary when the object is repeated? Thanks!

Check out this post - not very satisfying but hopefully helpful! If that doesn't help, let us know. :)

Great username, btw!
avatar
L
TheUltimateWinner
CEO
CEO
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 2519
Own Kudos [?]: 2096 [0]
Given Kudos: 1976
Concentration: Finance, Technology
Schools: Harvard '24 Judge '23 LBS '24 McCombs '24 Mendoza Tepper '24 Ross '24 Cox Marshall '24 Fisher Kelley '24 Jones McDonough '24 Owen '24 Terry BU Simon '24 Katz GWU Mason Babson Gabelli Foster '24 Goizueta '24 Scheller Stern '23 CBS '23 Booth '23 Haas '25 Wharton '25 Stanford '26 Johnson'23 Fuqua '23 Kellogg '23 Kenan-Flagler'23 INSEAD Aug 22 intake Olin '23 Said '23 Sloan '23 Carey Arizona "22 Yale '23 UC Davis Madison '23 Anderson '23 Carroll Carlson '23 Darden '23
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the el [#permalink] New post   17 Sep 2020, 06:01
Quote:
Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel.


(A) that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving

(B) that has suggested the elephant descended from an aquatic animal, its trunk originally evolving

(C) suggesting that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal with its trunk originally evolved

(D) to suggest that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal and its trunk originally evolved

(E) to suggest that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally evolved

Request Expert Reply:
Hi honorable experts,
MartyTargetTestPrep, GMATNinja, GMATGuruNY, VeritasPrepHailey, BrightOutlookJenn, AjiteshArun
Q:
Can 'evidence' suggest in real life? if not, can we remove choice A by this way?
Appreciating your help!
User avatar
S
BrightOutlookJenn
Tutor
Joined: 29 Dec 2013
Posts: 100
Own Kudos [?]: 434 [0]
Given Kudos: 15
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V51
Send PM
Re: Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the el [#permalink] New post   17 Sep 2020, 12:19
Expert Reply
TheUltimateWinner wrote:
Hi honorable experts,

Q:
Can 'evidence' suggest in real life? if not, can we remove choice A by this way?
Appreciating your help!


Hi TheUltimateWinner

By "in real life", do you mean in the present tense? I'm not quite sure I understand what you're asking. :)
avatar
L
TheUltimateWinner
CEO
CEO
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 2519
Own Kudos [?]: 2096 [0]
Given Kudos: 1976
Concentration: Finance, Technology
Schools: Harvard '24 Judge '23 LBS '24 McCombs '24 Mendoza Tepper '24 Ross '24 Cox Marshall '24 Fisher Kelley '24 Jones McDonough '24 Owen '24 Terry BU Simon '24 Katz GWU Mason Babson Gabelli Foster '24 Goizueta '24 Scheller Stern '23 CBS '23 Booth '23 Haas '25 Wharton '25 Stanford '26 Johnson'23 Fuqua '23 Kellogg '23 Kenan-Flagler'23 INSEAD Aug 22 intake Olin '23 Said '23 Sloan '23 Carey Arizona "22 Yale '23 UC Davis Madison '23 Anderson '23 Carroll Carlson '23 Darden '23
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the el [#permalink] New post   17 Sep 2020, 12:44
BrightOutlookJenn wrote:
TheUltimateWinner wrote:
Hi honorable experts,

Q:
Can 'evidence' suggest in real life? if not, can we remove choice A by this way?
Appreciating your help!


Hi TheUltimateWinner

By "in real life", do you mean in the present tense? I'm not quite sure I understand what you're asking. :)

BrightOutlookJenn
Thanks for the reply mam..
Choice A says:
Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel.
In this choice, the 'evidence' is going to suggest blah blah...
You can suggest me as a human-being, but how an 'evidence' suggests.....? The 'evidence' is NOT a human-being! :)
User avatar
S
BrightOutlookJenn
Tutor
Joined: 29 Dec 2013
Posts: 100
Own Kudos [?]: 434 [1]
Given Kudos: 15
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V51
Send PM
Re: Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the el [#permalink] New post   17 Sep 2020, 13:12
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
TheUltimateWinner wrote:
BrightOutlookJenn wrote:
TheUltimateWinner wrote:
Hi honorable experts,

Q:
Can 'evidence' suggest in real life? if not, can we remove choice A by this way?
Appreciating your help!


Hi TheUltimateWinner

By "in real life", do you mean in the present tense? I'm not quite sure I understand what you're asking. :)

BrightOutlookJenn
Thanks for the reply mam..
Choice A says:
Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel.
In this choice, the 'evidence' is going to suggest blah blah...
You can suggest me as a human-being, but how an 'evidence' suggests.....? The 'evidence' is NOT a human-being! :)


Haha! Indeed, you can use suggests in this way. The study suggests, the evidence suggests, the data suggest(s). The meaning is "leads the reader to think/believe," but it is not as strong as "proves."

However, every single answer choice uses suggest as the verb for what evidence does, just with different conjugations or prepositions. So there's no way to escape this verb in this question.

If I may make a suggestion to you - if you're uncomfortable with this word in this context, I would recommend reading more from high-quality sources. Science News and Science Daily are great free options where I can guarantee you will find this verb used in this sense ... as well as plenty of other good material for GMAT Verbal training (RC as well as SC).
avatar
L
TheUltimateWinner
CEO
CEO
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 2519
Own Kudos [?]: 2096 [0]
Given Kudos: 1976
Concentration: Finance, Technology
Schools: Harvard '24 Judge '23 LBS '24 McCombs '24 Mendoza Tepper '24 Ross '24 Cox Marshall '24 Fisher Kelley '24 Jones McDonough '24 Owen '24 Terry BU Simon '24 Katz GWU Mason Babson Gabelli Foster '24 Goizueta '24 Scheller Stern '23 CBS '23 Booth '23 Haas '25 Wharton '25 Stanford '26 Johnson'23 Fuqua '23 Kellogg '23 Kenan-Flagler'23 INSEAD Aug 22 intake Olin '23 Said '23 Sloan '23 Carey Arizona "22 Yale '23 UC Davis Madison '23 Anderson '23 Carroll Carlson '23 Darden '23
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the el [#permalink] New post   17 Sep 2020, 13:30
BrightOutlookJenn wrote:
TheUltimateWinner wrote:
BrightOutlookJenn wrote:

Hi TheUltimateWinner

By "in real life", do you mean in the present tense? I'm not quite sure I understand what you're asking. :)

BrightOutlookJenn
Thanks for the reply mam..
Choice A says:
Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel.
In this choice, the 'evidence' is going to suggest blah blah...
You can suggest me as a human-being, but how an 'evidence' suggests.....? The 'evidence' is NOT a human-being! :)


Haha! Indeed, you can use suggests in this way. The study suggests, the evidence suggests, the data suggest(s). The meaning is "leads the reader to think/believe," but it is not as strong as "proves."

However, every single answer choice uses suggest as the verb for what evidence does, just with different conjugations or prepositions. So there's no way to escape this verb in this question.

If I may make a suggestion to you - if you're uncomfortable with this word in this context, I would recommend reading more from high-quality sources. Science News and Science Daily are great free options where I can guarantee you will find this verb used in this sense ... as well as plenty of other good material for GMAT Verbal training (RC as well as SC).


Quote:
Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel.

(A) that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving
(B) that has suggested the elephant descended from an aquatic animal, its trunk originally evolving
(C) suggesting that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal with its trunk originally evolved
(D) to suggest that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal and its trunk originally evolved
(E) to suggest that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally evolved

In choice A,B, and C, the 'evidence is going to suggest blah blah...
But, in choice D and E, the 'Australian embryologists is going to suggest blah blah.... So, it seems that 'suggesting by evidence' is not appropriate (at least to me :) ) I've crossed out choice A,B and C because 'evidence is suggesting there :) ). Am I wrong in the process of elimination, mam?

Quote:
If I may make a suggestion to you - if you're uncomfortable with this word in this context, I would recommend reading more from high-quality sources. Science News and Science Daily are great free options where I can guarantee you will find this verb used in this sense ... as well as plenty of other good material for GMAT Verbal training (RC as well as SC).

Thanks for the nice suggestion. I'll try to follow your suggestion with heart! But, I used the sentence (You can suggest me as a human-being) just to mean that 'people can suggest; human-being can suggest; the teacher can suggest, but how an evidence can suggest?
Hope you get me!
Thanks for your help...
User avatar
L
AjiteshArun
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5181
Own Kudos [?]: 4653 [1]
Given Kudos: 631
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
Re: Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the el [#permalink] New post   17 Sep 2020, 20:51
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
TheUltimateWinner wrote:
But, I used the sentence (You can suggest me as a human-being) just to mean that 'people can suggest; human-being can suggest; the teacher can suggest, but how an evidence can suggest?

Hi TheUltimateWinner,

This meaning is correct:
BrightOutlookJenn wrote:
The meaning is "leads the reader to think/believe,"

Let's try this with another word with the same meaning. Would you be comfortable with "the evidence indicates"? If indicates sounds okay, you could look at suggests as ~indicates, because that is what suggests means in this case ("the evidence suggests" ~ "the evidence indicates").
User avatar
S
WarriorWithin
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2020
Posts: 66
Own Kudos [?]: 81 [0]
Given Kudos: 151
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Ross '23 Kenan-Flagler'23 Fisher '23 Tepper '23 Olin '23 Marshall'23 Booth '23 Foster '23
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.95
WE:Analyst (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the el [#permalink] New post   23 Nov 2020, 00:06
ronybtl wrote:
Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel.

Quote:
(A) that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving

that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel.
I chose A - but I do understand that it is incorrect choice because of the Parallelism issue (Clause, and Noun+Noun Modifier) but

Quote:
(E) to suggest that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally evolved

I have eliminated E because I am not comfortable with the pronoun "it" placed after that.

Can someone please explain - Is it possible for the pronoun in the parallel list to refer back to noun in the list before it? Is it the grammatically correct? Just as in the case of two clauses, IC and DC, the pronoun in DC can refer back to the one in IC when connected with conjunctions.

GMATNinja VeritasKarishma @e-GMAT
User avatar
S
lakshya14
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Posts: 368
Own Kudos [?]: 43 [0]
Given Kudos: 530
Send PM
Re: Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the el [#permalink] New post   23 Nov 2020, 11:18
I got this correct though I still have a doubt. Can "its" in (A), refer back to to the Australian embryologist (keeping it singular in this) as "its" being the subjecy of the second clause refers to the subject of the first clause. Or because of "that" in (A) in the first clause making it a dependent clause, then "its" will refer back to "elephants", which is the subject if the dependent clause?
avatar
L
AndrewN
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Posts: 3512
Own Kudos [?]: 6858 [2]
Given Kudos: 500
Re: Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the el [#permalink] New post   23 Nov 2020, 15:46
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
lakshya14 wrote:
I got this correct though I still have a doubt. Can "its" in (A), refer back to to the Australian embryologist (keeping it singular in this) as "its" being the subjecy of the second clause refers to the subject of the first clause. Or because of "that" in (A) in the first clause making it a dependent clause, then "its" will refer back to "elephants", which is the subject if the dependent clause?

Hello, lakshya14. Since Australian embryologists (scientists)—or embryologists from any other country, for that matter—do not have trunks, its cannot logically refer to any embryologist (even if one possessed a particularly long nose). The same its can, however, point back to an aquatic animal, and that presents an ambiguity issue. Especially if such an aquatic animal were understood to be the precursor to the elephant, it might be sensible to suggest that it, the forebear, had evolved a snorkel-like proboscis. In any case, without and, we would be looking at an absolute phrase, and the grammatical construct would work fine, even if, for reasons discussed above, the clear expression of vital meaning was a bit off.

I had a good chuckle at the image of an embryologist with an elephantine nose. Speaking to your question, though, I hope that everything makes sense now.

- Andrew
User avatar
L
KarishmaB
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14822
Own Kudos [?]: 64908 [2]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the el [#permalink] New post   23 Nov 2020, 23:48
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
WarriorWithin wrote:
ronybtl wrote:
Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel.

Quote:
(A) that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving

that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel.
I chose A - but I do understand that it is incorrect choice because of the Parallelism issue (Clause, and Noun+Noun Modifier) but

Quote:
(E) to suggest that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally evolved

I have eliminated E because I am not comfortable with the pronoun "it" placed after that.

Can someone please explain - Is it possible for the pronoun in the parallel list to refer back to noun in the list before it? Is it the grammatically correct? Just as in the case of two clauses, IC and DC, the pronoun in DC can refer back to the one in IC when connected with conjunctions.

GMATNinja VeritasKarishma @e-GMAT


Yes it can. The first 'that clause' on the list is an essential part of the sentence and gives you the topic of discussion. The second that clause gives you further information about that topic.

For example:

He informed me that my sister had arrived in the city and that she had brought her dog along.

Think about how he would have told me:
Your sister has arrived in the city. She has brought her dog along.

The meaning is clear. There is no pronoun ambiguity. 'She' and 'her' refer to 'my sister'.

Similarly here, this is what As are suggesting:
The elephant is descended from an aquatic animal. Its trunk originally evolved as a kind of snorkel.

Meaning is clear.
User avatar
B
kagrawal16
Manager
Manager
Joined: 31 Jul 2018
Posts: 99
Own Kudos [?]: 15 [0]
Given Kudos: 76
Location: India
Schools: ISB '23 (S) IIMA PGPX'23
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GPA: 3
Send PM
Re: Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the el [#permalink] New post   15 Dec 2020, 23:30
Hi GMATGuruNY VeritasKarishma GMATNinja

Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel.
(A) that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving
(B) that has suggested the elephant descended from an aquatic animal, its trunk originally evolving
(C) suggesting that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal with its trunk originally evolved
(D) to suggest that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal and its trunk originally evolved
(E) to suggest that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally evolved

I have a question around the usage of is descended from.

If I am right, descended is intransitive and used as an adjective with "is" as the main verb.
Also, is descended cannot be a passive voice verb because descended is intransitive. Therefore is descended is not the verb.

As per my understanding, the passive voice leads to the past participle ed modifier. The ed modifier should be transitive as well.

But then why does the below e.g. feel correct
...elephant, descended from an aquatic animal,...

Does the past participle modifier have to be transitive as well ?
If yes, then in the above e.g. can we call descended an adjective and there is this subtle difference between classifying ed as an adjective or past participle modifier.
Then I am happy to ignore this difference :)
OR
Is the above e.g. incorrect.

Kindly help with this usage.
User avatar
D
GMATGuruNY
Tutor
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Posts: 1315
Own Kudos [?]: 3136 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Send PM
Re: Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the el [#permalink] New post   16 Dec 2020, 04:35
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
kagrawal16 wrote:
Kindly help with this usage.


to be descended from X = to be a blood relative of X
In this context, I would classify descended from as an adjective.
User avatar
L
CrackverbalGMAT
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Posts: 4946
Own Kudos [?]: 7626 [0]
Given Kudos: 215
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the el [#permalink] New post   19 Apr 2021, 06:10
Top Contributor
Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel.


(A) that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving
What does the evidence suggest?
1) Elephant is descended from an aquatic animal
2) its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel.

Evolving is a participial modifier modifying the trunks and is not a verb.
After “and” we need to use a clause- a relative clause will fix the error of parallelism here.

(B) that has suggested the elephant descended from an aquatic animal, its trunk originally evolving
Same as A.
The use of present perfect tense is unnecessary.

(C) suggesting that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal with its trunk originally evolved

The use of past perfect tense is incorrect. We are not talking about an action that happened before the other.

(D) to suggest that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal and its trunk originally evolved
Same as C.

(E) to suggest that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally evolved

The use of “that” clearly introduces the relative clauses. “Evolved” functions as a verb and makes the two clauses parallel. Correct.

Vishnupriya
GMAT Verbal SME
avatar
B
Jaya6
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Jan 2021
Posts: 71
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [0]
Given Kudos: 142
Location: India
Schools: ISB '23 (S)
GPA: 3.2
Send PM
Re: Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the el [#permalink] New post   19 Apr 2021, 08:11
GMATNinjaTwo wrote:
Quote:
Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolved as a kind of snorkel.


(A) that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolved
The sentence is trying to tell us that the evidence suggests two things: 1) that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and 2) that the elephant's trunk originally evolved as a kind of snorkel; in order to avoid a parallelism issue, we would have to change, "..., and its trunk originally evolved as a kind of snorkel" to "and that its trunk evolved as a kind of snorkel." Furthermore, this sentence has a string of relative clauses ("evidence that suggests that the elephant...", and the GMAT considers it "awkward and confusing to string together relative clauses." For these two reasons, choice A can be eliminated.

(B) that has suggested the elephant descended from an aquatic animal, its trunk originally evolving
The simple present tense ("suggests") should be used instead of the present perfect tense ("has suggested") because we are describing a present action (what is the evidence currently doing?) and not referring to what the evidence was doing in the past. Present perfect is typically used to describe how long an action has been going on, for example, "For the past 100 years, most evidence has suggested (present perfect) that the elephant is descended from a land animal; however, new evidence suggests (simple present) that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal." Furthermore, a past tense should be used instead of "evolving" because we are talking about a past action (how the trunk evolved in the past, not how it is evolving now), so choice B can be eliminated.

(C) suggesting that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal with its trunk originally evolving
This choice can easily be eliminated because the past perfect ("had descended") is not the appropriate tense (we do not have two past actions occurring at different times). Also, a past tense should be used instead of "evolving" (see choice B notes).

(D) to suggest that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal and its trunk originally evolving
Again, the past perfect ("had descended") is not the appropriate tense. Also, this choice contains a parallelism issue ("its trunk originally evolving..." is not parallel to "that the elephant had descended.."), and a past tense should be used instead of "evolving" (see choice B notes).

(E) to suggest that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally evolved
Here the infinitive "to suggest" is properly used as an adjective to modify "evidence". This choice also avoids parallelism issues ("suggest that the elephant is descended... and that its trunk originally evolved..."). The predicate adjective "descended" follows the linking verb "is" and properly modifies "the elephant". This might not sound right because we are used to hearing "descend" used as a verb (ie "I descended a flight a stairs."), but you shouldn't trust your ear when analyzing SC problems! Choice E is correct.




Hi,

can you help me understand the position of 'is descended' in this sentence as a part of speech? also, the question says have found which is past perfect so is it correct to use 'is', a present tense here?
User avatar
L
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6920
Own Kudos [?]: 63664 [0]
Given Kudos: 1773
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the el [#permalink] New post   23 Apr 2021, 10:14
Expert Reply
Jaya6 wrote:

Hi,

can you help me understand the position of 'is descended' in this sentence as a part of speech? also, the question says have found which is past perfect so is it correct to use 'is', a present tense here?

The combination of some form of "to be" plus the past participle of a verb creates a passive verb construction.

Here's an example: "My leftovers are stolen out of the fridge every night by my hungry spouse." The verb in this sentence is "are stolen."

Similarly, in the clause "the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal," the verb is "is descended."

In addition, "have found" is the present perfect, not the past perfect. The past perfect will always have the word "had" (for example, "had eaten," "had kicked"). The present perfect, on the other hand, will contain the word "have" or "has" (for example, "has eaten," or "have kicked").

The present perfect tells us that an action started in the past and continued up to the present moment. So, in saying that Australian embryologists "have found evidence..." we know that this discovery began in the past and is now complete.

This can be correctly used with a variety of other tenses. For example, I could say that "I have discovered that my own spouse ate the last croissant." Here, I have discovered something that happened in the past.

Or, I could say that "I have discovered that the local zoo allows visitors to feed the giraffes." Here, I have discovered something that is happening in the present.

In the official example, the embryologists "have found" two things: that the elephant "is descended.." and that "its trunk originally evolved..." One of these things is in the present (the elephant is currently descended), and one is in the past (the trunk evolved in the past). That's totally fine! Those tenses make sense with the intended meaning of the sentence.

For much more on verb tenses, check out this video.

I hope that helps!
GMAT Club Bot
gmatclubot
Re: Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the el [#permalink]
23 Apr 2021, 10:14
   1   2   3   4   5   
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne
Main navigation
GMAT Resources
Partners
MBA Resources
www.gmac.com|www.mba.com | | GMAT Club Rules | Terms and Conditions