Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Jul 2014, 04:41

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2009
Posts: 231
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 6

GMAT Tests User
Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests [#permalink] New post 04 Jun 2010, 18:36
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

38% (01:30) correct 63% (01:23) wrong based on 13 sessions
Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal. and its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel.

(A) that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving
(B) that has suggested the elephant descended from an aquatic animal, its trunk originally evolving
(C) suggesting that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal with its trunk originally evolved
(D) to suggest that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal and its trunk originally evolved
(E) to suggest that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally evolved


Thanks
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Apr 2010
Posts: 230
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: This one doesn't sound correct.........don't get it [#permalink] New post 05 Jun 2010, 21:18
This is quite confusing.
Can someone please explain???
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 995
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 374 [0], given: 36

GMAT Tests User
Re: This one doesn't sound correct.........don't get it [#permalink] New post 05 Jun 2010, 22:03
A it is. clear and precise.

evidence that.

So between A and B

(B) that has suggested the elephant descended from an aquatic animal, its trunk originally evolving

Past tense "descended" doesn't go with the continuous "evolving". OUT

_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Director
Director
avatar
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 995
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 374 [0], given: 36

GMAT Tests User
Re: This one doesn't sound correct.........don't get it [#permalink] New post 05 Jun 2010, 22:43
This one was tricky.

Sorry its E.

Observations -
1. I see "evidence that" is broken here. But that's not what the question is checking. I should be able to connect the underlined part with the rest of the sentence.

2. The SC is checking for that || ism

Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal. and its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel.

(A) that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving >>> descended and evolving are awkward. OUT

(B) that has suggested the elephant descended from an aquatic animal, its trunk originally evolving

same as A. OUT

(C) suggesting that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal with its trunk originally evolved

this means that elephant descended before its trunk evolved. OUT

(D) to suggest that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal and its trunk originally evolved

same as D. OUT

(E) to suggest that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally evolved

This means that elephant descended from aquatic animal and its trunk originally evolved as a kind of snorkel. this looks alright. Especially its not doing any sequencing between the two past events

evidence...... that and that ..... -----> that || ism

_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1563
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 184 [0], given: 6

Re: This one doesn't sound correct.........don't get it [#permalink] New post 14 Jun 2010, 06:18
E as it is parallel.

What is the OA?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2009
Posts: 231
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 6

GMAT Tests User
Re: This one doesn't sound correct.........don't get it [#permalink] New post 14 Jun 2010, 07:26
OA is E.


||isms 'that descended....that evolved'


Thanks
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: This one doesn't sound correct.........don't get it [#permalink] New post 05 Jan 2011, 10:14
papillon86 wrote:
OA is E.


||isms 'that descended....that evolved'


Thanks


A also seems || to me:

evidence that suggests that X, and (that) Y.

The second (that) is implicit and therefore not strictly necessary.

Thoughts on that?

_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Mesmerized
Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 181
Location: UAE, Dubai
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 12

GMAT Tests User
Re: This one doesn't sound correct.........don't get it [#permalink] New post 05 Jan 2011, 20:12
you can't omit a relative pronoun.
you can omit a modal (have, has...) because it gets carried over after AND.
you can omit prepositions (to, of ...)
but not a relative pronoun(that, which, who, ...)

_________________

Nanquam Fractum

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Dec 2010
Posts: 99
Location: Australia
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V37
GPA: 3.37
WE: Engineering (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 15

Re: This one doesn't sound correct.........don't get it [#permalink] New post 05 Jan 2011, 20:23
papillon86 wrote:
Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal. and its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel.

(A) that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving
(B) that has suggested the elephant descended from an aquatic animal, its trunk originally evolving
(C) suggesting that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal with its trunk originally evolved
(D) to suggest that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal and its trunk originally evolved
(E) to suggest that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally evolved


Thanks


In the original sentence, the "and its trunk" after the comma is unclear. It can refer to either the elephant, or the aquatic animal => incorrect. To correct this, this needs to change to "and that its trunk" without a comma. Looking at the questions, the only option of the 4 remaining options to finish like this was E.

An alternative way of looking at it is is thru idioms. The proper idiom is "found to suggest", as opposed to "found evidence that suggests". This leaves you with D & E after doing a split. Since "and its trunk" is unclear in D (it can refer to either the elephant or the other animal) - this leaves E.

_________________

Kudos always appreciated if my post helped you :)

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: This one doesn't sound correct.........don't get it [#permalink] New post 06 Jan 2011, 02:49
elevinty wrote:
you can't omit a relative pronoun.
you can omit a modal (have, has...) because it gets carried over after AND.
you can omit prepositions (to, of ...)
but not a relative pronoun(that, which, who, ...)


ok, thanks, that helped.

However, other issue with A is "evolving".

_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 209
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 44

CAT Tests
Re: Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests [#permalink] New post 20 Sep 2012, 20:31
"is descended from" is an idiomatic expression. it means "descended" in the sense of EVOLUTIONARY ANCESTRY.
this is the only sense in which you can use this idiom.

"had descended" / "has descended" (i.e., normal past perfect / present perfect) is incorrect in this sense, as it implies literal downward motion.

_________________

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, I kinda need some =)

Re: Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests   [#permalink] 20 Sep 2012, 20:31
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
7 Experts publish their posts in the topic Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests souvik101990 11 25 Sep 2012, 10:25
Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests wolver123 4 10 Oct 2009, 22:48
1 Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests Nihit 11 27 Sep 2008, 06:35
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests zoltan 14 02 Apr 2008, 05:00
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests ronybtl 26 05 Dec 2005, 21:46
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.