It is currently Wed May 23, 2012 5:19 am




   Post new topic Reply to topic      [ 2 posts ]  Bookmark and Share Oldest Best Reply
Author Message
  AWA feedback HIGHLY appreciated [#permalink]
New postPosted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 10:29 pm 
Offline
Intern
Intern

Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011
Posts: 2
Location: Japan
Concentration: International Business, Finance
GMAT 1: 580 Q41 V29
GPA: 3.25
WE: Supply Chain Management (Manufacturing)
Followers: 0

Kudos (?): 5 (0), given: 0

This is an essay topic from one of the MGMAT CAT tests.
I have written the essay under timed session.

Background: Japanese (non-native)
I basically went blank on the actual test because I hardly put any time preparing for AWA and I am going to retake it on mid-nov.
(retaking not because of AWA only... Got a dissappointing 580 after 2.5months of study)

ESSAY QUESTION:
The following appeared as part of a campaign statement for Velazquez, who is seeking election as alderman in the town of Barchester:

“Under Police Commissioner Draco, the city of Spartanburg began jailing people for committing petty crimes such as littering, shoplifting, and spraying graffiti. Criminals in Spartanburg must have understood that lawlessness would no longer be tolerated, because the following year Spartanburg saw a 20% drop in violent crimes such as homicide. Our town should learn from Commissioner Draco’s success, and begin a large-scale crackdown on petty crime.”

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

YOUR RESPONSE:
There is a gap in the line of reasoning in the Velazquez's statement. He claimes that because commissioner Darco started jailing people for committing petty crimes , it can be concluded that the campaign was successful in reducing the rate of violent crimes.

First, Velazquez addressed two different categories of crimes and reasoned that because of some actions taken for one category, the other category must have had an effect. It is an assumption on which no clear relation other than "awareness" has been shown between the two category. The Violent and petty crimes may or may not be related, but the relation is not stated nor can be concluded.

Second, the reason for the 20% drop in violent crimes is not presented, but assumed. The 20% drop in violent crimes may be because of many reasons for instance, if very little violent crimes are committed at any given time, 1 or 2 violent crime difference can set a big change in the rate of violent crimes. for example if only 2 violent crimes were committed last year and only 1 violent crime was committed this year, the rate of drop would be 50%! So, it would be more convincing to show a drop in number of violent crimes as opposed to rate of violent crimes.

Finally, the statement can be strengthened by streamlining the cause and effect. For example, The violent crime rate has decreased because the penalty for violent crimes was increased by 50% longer imprisonment. This show a straight forward link between the cause and effect as opposed to relating a cause that may or may not have an effect on the other.


  Profile  
 
Manhattan GMAT Discount CodesKaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount Codes
  Re: AWA feedback HIGHLY appreciated [#permalink]
New postPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 2:47 pm 
Offline
Intern
Intern
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011
Posts: 41
Concentration: Finance
Schools: Stern, Yale, Darden, Johnson, Tepper
GMAT Date: 08-04-2012
GPA: 3.3
WE: Accounting (Non-Profit and Government)
Followers: 0

Kudos (?): 5 (0), given: 11

rxs2kei wrote:
This is an essay topic from one of the MGMAT CAT tests.
I have written the essay under timed session.

Background: Japanese (non-native)
I basically went blank on the actual test because I hardly put any time preparing for AWA and I am going to retake it on mid-nov.
(retaking not because of AWA only... Got a dissappointing 580 after 2.5months of study)

ESSAY QUESTION:
The following appeared as part of a campaign statement for Velazquez, who is seeking election as alderman in the town of Barchester:

“Under Police Commissioner Draco, the city of Spartanburg began jailing people for committing petty crimes such as littering, shoplifting, and spraying graffiti. Criminals in Spartanburg must have understood that lawlessness would no longer be tolerated, because the following year Spartanburg saw a 20% drop in violent crimes such as homicide. Our town should learn from Commissioner Draco’s success, and begin a large-scale crackdown on petty crime.”

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

YOUR RESPONSE:
There is a gap in the line of reasoning in the Velazquez's statement. He claimes that because commissioner Darco started jailing people for committing petty crimes , it can be concluded that the campaign was successful in reducing the rate of violent crimes.

First, Velazquez addressed two different categories of crimes and reasoned that because of some actions taken for one category, the other category must have had an effect. It is an assumption on which no clear relation other than "awareness" has been shown between the two category. The Violent and petty crimes may or may not be related, but the relation is not stated nor can be concluded.

Second, the reason for the 20% drop in violent crimes is not presented, but assumed. The 20% drop in violent crimes may be because of many reasons for instance, if very little violent crimes are committed at any given time, 1 or 2 violent crime difference can set a big change in the rate of violent crimes. for example if only 2 violent crimes were committed last year and only 1 violent crime was committed this year, the rate of drop would be 50%! So, it would be more convincing to show a drop in number of violent crimes as opposed to rate of violent crimes.

Finally, the statement can be strengthened by streamlining the cause and effect. For example, The violent crime rate has decreased because the penalty for violent crimes was increased by 50% longer imprisonment. This show a straight forward link between the cause and effect as opposed to relating a cause that may or may not have an effect on the other.


A lot people say the advice from Chineseburned helped them tremendously. Check out his post.

how-to-get-6-0-awa-my-guide-64327.html


  Profile  
 
Online
gmatclubot
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

 Similar topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
First stab at AWA, feedback appreciated

in Analytical Writing Assessment (AWA)

NishaTG

2

492

Sun Jun 20, 2010 10:24 am

Your advice will be highly appreciated !

in Ask Veritas Prep

ak2782

2

92

Sun Jun 05, 2011 4:04 am

Highly appreciate your rate. Issue

in Analytical Writing Assessment (AWA)

bsv180985

2

1277

Wed Nov 04, 2009 12:22 pm

Would appreciate feedback on profile

in Ask Veritas Prep

jjaacc

5

777

Wed May 31, 2006 12:41 am

Profile Feedback Appreciated

in Ask Veritas Prep

Gottschalk

1

661

Fri Jan 12, 2007 10:41 am





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


Search for:
Jump to:





[ Mobile Version ] GMAT Club MBA Forum Home | About | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | GMAT Club Rules | Contact | Sitemap
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO
Kindly note that GMAT (C) is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC.