Bardis: Extensive research shows that television : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 19 Jan 2017, 22:21

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Bardis: Extensive research shows that television

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 10 Nov 2010
Posts: 164
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 275 [3] , given: 6

Bardis: Extensive research shows that television [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Mar 2011, 21:54
3
KUDOS
9
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

45% (02:35) correct 55% (02:00) wrong based on 316 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Bardis: Extensive research shows that television
consumers. Some people conclude from this that
violent television imagery sometimes causes
violent behavior. But the effectiveness of
those televised images being specifically designed
to alter buying habits, whereas television violence
is not designed to cause violent behavior. Hence
we can safely conclude that violent television
imagery does not cause violence.

The reasoning in Bardis’s argument is flawed because
that argument

(A) relies on an illegitimate inference from the fact
behavior
(B) fails to distinguish a type of behavior from a
type of stimulus that may or may not affect
behavior
(C) undermines its own position by questioning the
(D) concludes that a claim is false on the basis of
one purported fault in an argument in favor of
that claim
(E) fails to consider the possibility that the
argument it disputes is intended to address a
separate issue
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by vjsharma25 on 15 Mar 2011, 22:58, edited 1 time in total.
If you have any questions
New!
Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 920
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 341 [0], given: 123

### Show Tags

15 Mar 2011, 22:23
D?
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2011
Posts: 285
Concentration: General Management, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools: HBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V47
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 188 [4] , given: 13

### Show Tags

15 Mar 2011, 22:37
4
KUDOS
A. Argument never says that advertisements can cause violent behaviour- what is stated by the option itself is not correct.
B. Incorrect - there is no confusion in Bardis' statement about stimulus (advertisement, violent imagery) and behavior (purchase,violent behaviour)
C. Argument never challenged the persuasive power of advertising. In fact it uses that as a support to bolster his own conclusion
D. Correct option - Bardis wrongly rejects the whole argument on the basis of one flaw only - that the violent imagery is not purposedly designed to instigate violent behavior. That however in no way can help conclude that it doesn’t instiagte violent behaviour.
E. argument being intended to address separate issue is not indicated anywhere- argument clearly is addressing the concern expressed in the statement that violent imagery may instigate violent behaviour
Manager
Joined: 10 Nov 2010
Posts: 164
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 6

### Show Tags

15 Mar 2011, 22:54
vivesomnium wrote:
A. Argument never says that advertisements can cause violent behaviour- what is stated by the option itself is not correct.
B. Incorrect - there is no confusion in Bardis' statement about stimulus (advertisement, violent imagery) and behavior (purchase,violent behaviour)
C. Argument never challenged the persuasive power of advertising. In fact it uses that as a support to bolster his own conclusion
D. Correct option - Bardis wrongly rejects the whole argument on the basis of one flaw only - that the violent imagery is not purposedly designed to instigate violent behavior. That however in no way can help conclude that it doesn’t instiagte violent behaviour.
E. argument being intended to address separate issue is not indicated anywhere- argument clearly is addressing the concern expressed in the statement that violent imagery may instigate violent behaviour

Gud explanation!!
Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2011
Posts: 178
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 125 [0], given: 8

### Show Tags

15 Mar 2011, 23:13
vivesomnium wrote:
A. Argument never says that advertisements can cause violent behaviour- what is stated by the option itself is not correct.
B. Incorrect - there is no confusion in Bardis' statement about stimulus (advertisement, violent imagery) and behavior (purchase,violent behaviour)
C. Argument never challenged the persuasive power of advertising. In fact it uses that as a support to bolster his own conclusion
D. Correct option - Bardis wrongly rejects the whole argument on the basis of one flaw only - that the violent imagery is not purposedly designed to instigate violent behavior. That however in no way can help conclude that it doesn’t instiagte violent behaviour.
E. argument being intended to address separate issue is not indicated anywhere- argument clearly is addressing the concern expressed in the statement that violent imagery may instigate violent behaviour

awesome
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10534
Followers: 918

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Re: Bardis: Extensive research shows that television [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2014, 11:08
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10534
Followers: 918

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Re: Bardis: Extensive research shows that television [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2016, 15:53
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
SVP
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2197
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Stanford '19 (S)
GMAT 1: 560 Q42 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q39 V27
GMAT 3: 560 Q43 V24
GMAT 4: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Followers: 20

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 140

Re: Bardis: Extensive research shows that television [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Nov 2016, 09:15
vjsharma25 wrote:
Bardis: Extensive research shows that television
consumers. Some people conclude from this that
violent television imagery sometimes causes
violent behavior. But the effectiveness of
those televised images being specifically designed
to alter buying habits, whereas television violence
is not designed to cause violent behavior. Hence
we can safely conclude that violent television
imagery does not cause violence.

The reasoning in Bardis’s argument is flawed because
that argument

(A) relies on an illegitimate inference from the fact
behavior
(B) fails to distinguish a type of behavior from a
type of stimulus that may or may not affect
behavior
(C) undermines its own position by questioning the
(D) concludes that a claim is false on the basis of
one purported fault in an argument in favor of
that claim
(E) fails to consider the possibility that the
argument it disputes is intended to address a
separate issue

I could easily eliminate all but D.
Senior Manager
Status: Exam scheduled!!
Joined: 05 Sep 2016
Posts: 411
Location: United States (WI)
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
WE: Other (Law)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 241

Re: Bardis: Extensive research shows that television [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Nov 2016, 22:20
Definitely D - person states that those who say tv leads to violence are mistaken - the argument is flawed because just because something it not intended to cause violence, doesn't mean that it doesn't.
Re: Bardis: Extensive research shows that television   [#permalink] 25 Nov 2016, 22:20
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
25 The more viewers a television show attracts, the greater the advertisi 4 16 May 2016, 04:13
A TV producer has reached maximum audience with a TV show 6 22 Feb 2016, 03:46
7 Extensive archaeological research has shown that male crusaders killed 11 30 Aug 2015, 13:53
24 Studies show that children who watch too much television are 7 06 Mar 2013, 01:53
The television show Henry was not widely watched until it 11 22 May 2011, 19:27
Display posts from previous: Sort by