Barras, Agna & Cussaia - any increase 5% or more... : Integrated Reasoning (IR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 17 Jan 2017, 08:11

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Barras, Agna & Cussaia - any increase 5% or more...

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 30 Jun 2013
Posts: 12
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 680 Q44 V39
GMAT 2: 700 Q49 V36
WE: Accounting (Manufacturing)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 21

Barras, Agna & Cussaia - any increase 5% or more... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2013, 21:45
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Attachments

GMAT prep test IR - Barras Agna Cussaia 1.jpg [ 353.45 KiB | Viewed 14476 times ]

Intern
Joined: 24 Jun 2013
Posts: 18
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 29 [2] , given: 2

Re: Barras, Agna & Cussaia - any increase 5% or more... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2013, 06:32
2
KUDOS
Hi,

Please use table 2. The question is demanding us to assume 5% or more of a given food item. From AD 600 to AD 700, the proportion of grains increased from 10% to 15%. Here the overall consumption of a given food should be considered and not the overall food consumption increase.

Hope this helps.

Thanks,
Ari
Intern
Joined: 30 Jun 2013
Posts: 12
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 680 Q44 V39
GMAT 2: 700 Q49 V36
WE: Accounting (Manufacturing)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 21

Re: Barras, Agna & Cussaia - any increase 5% or more... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2013, 01:49
arichinna wrote:
Hi,

Please use table 2. The question is demanding us to assume 5% or more of a given food item. From AD 600 to AD 700, the proportion of grains increased from 10% to 15%. Here the overall consumption of a given food should be considered and not the overall food consumption increase.

Hope this helps.

Thanks,
Ari

Thanks! I think I kept reading the paragraph and looking at table 3. Was stuck on this quiet a while - thanks heaps
Manager
Status: Got Bling! Joined Phd Finance at IIML
Joined: 03 Jul 2013
Posts: 99
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: iim-bangalore - Class of 1994
GMAT 1: 750 Q59 V43
GPA: 3.12
WE: Research (Investment Banking)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 39

Re: Barras, Agna & Cussaia - any increase 5% or more... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2013, 19:47
Obviously, Anyone can provide them the grain, the point is Barras imported as the consumtion was up the target 5% to trigger that assumption
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2012
Posts: 464
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 53 [1] , given: 58

Re: Barras, Agna & Cussaia - any increase 5% or more... - new qu [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2013, 10:10
1
KUDOS
An additional question that I am inserting here due to the fact that the tables are already here:

and the correct is in a square, mine are in the circle
Attachments

q2.jpg [ 48.32 KiB | Viewed 13959 times ]

Intern
Joined: 16 Nov 2012
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 40

Re: Barras, Agna & Cussaia - any increase 5% or more... - new qu [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2013, 23:25
ronr34 wrote:
An additional question that I am inserting here due to the fact that the tables are already here:

and the correct is in a square, mine are in the circle

I think it asks that the facts be distinctly shown by both the passage and tables, therefore the questions have been answered as no in each case.

Had the question been, Was seafood a major chunk of the diet plan for Barras? then the answer would have been yes.
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Apr 2014
Posts: 291
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 46

Barras, Agna & Cussaia - any increase 5% or more... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jul 2014, 00:08
Not able to figure out how the first one was solved. Does no over here mean - Can not be determined ?
Intern
Joined: 27 Jan 2015
Posts: 7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [1] , given: 1

Re: Barras, Agna & Cussaia - any increase 5% or more... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Mar 2015, 12:55
1
KUDOS
Again a question regarding the "grains from cassia from 600 to 700"

The question states: "Assume that any increase of 5% or more from one century to the next in the AMOUNT..."

Tab 2 gives us information about the "percentages, by estimated weight, of dietary items consumed per person"
We see an increase of 5% of grain. However, tab 2 gives us only information about the composition of the dietary in each century and not about the consumed amount. Isn't it possible that the overall consumed amount was reduced and the amount of grain consumption did not increase by 5%? Therefore, the event in the question stem would not hold in this scenario.

Am I flawed in my thinking process?
Intern
Joined: 09 Apr 2015
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [1] , given: 1

Re: Barras, Agna & Cussaia - any increase 5% or more... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2015, 08:39
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
lucky1829 wrote:
Again a question regarding the "grains from cassia from 600 to 700"

The question states: "Assume that any increase of 5% or more from one century to the next in the AMOUNT..."

Tab 2 gives us information about the "percentages, by estimated weight, of dietary items consumed per person"
We see an increase of 5% of grain. However, tab 2 gives us only information about the composition of the dietary in each century and not about the consumed amount. Isn't it possible that the overall consumed amount was reduced and the amount of grain consumption did not increase by 5%? Therefore, the event in the question stem would not hold in this scenario.

Am I flawed in my thinking process?

Your reasoning is prfectly OK, but the trick here is how to use the 2 tables together to solve the problem. Notice that seafood consumption percentage remains the same from 600s to700s (65%), and its actual consumed amount arised from 240 to 250 (a bit more). In other words, the total amout of food consume must have increased too. So, grain consumption actually has in increase of at least 50% (from 10% of x to 15% of y, while y is bigger than x).
Intern
Joined: 02 Apr 2016
Posts: 17
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Barras, Agna & Cussaia - any increase 5% or more... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2016, 19:38
Can some one help me with this one ? Its the same set from the above passage mentioned ..
Attachments

ir1.PNG [ 59.08 KiB | Viewed 3983 times ]

Intern
Joined: 31 Oct 2015
Posts: 37
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 53

Re: Barras, Agna & Cussaia - any increase 5% or more... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2016, 16:28
Monthly meat consumption for a family of 4 in AD 1000 = 160 lb
Residents in AD 1000 = 400, ~100 families of 4.
100 * 160 lb = 16,000

By a similar logic, in AD 1200 pounds consumed would be 24,000

Assuming a linear increase, the number in AD 1100 would BE 20,000 and the average in the 1000s would be 18,000.

Can you assume a linear increase? not sure, but it's definitely > 16,000
BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 938
Location: India
GMAT 1: 670 Q50 V32
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.65
WE: Brand Management (Health Care)
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 233 [0], given: 32

Barras, Agna & Cussaia - any increase 5% or more... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2016, 06:24
Surbhi17 wrote:
Can some one help me with this one ? Its the same set from the above passage mentioned ..

Number of residents in Baras in 1000 ADs =400.

=> on average for a 4 person family, we have 100 families.

Now we are given that 160 lbs is the average meat consumption of a 4 person family in 1000 ADs.

Thus, Average total meat consumption = 100 * 160=16000. Hence, Answer is C.
_________________

Thanks.

Intern
Joined: 06 May 2016
Posts: 48
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 110

Re: Barras, Agna & Cussaia - any increase 5% or more... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2016, 17:51
Hi can anyone please post explanation for question 3 of this MSR. why all the answers are NO? I am getting all as yes all of them are supported by passage individually!
BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 938
Location: India
GMAT 1: 670 Q50 V32
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.65
WE: Brand Management (Health Care)
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 233 [0], given: 32

Re: Barras, Agna & Cussaia - any increase 5% or more... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2016, 06:08
geek_mnnit wrote:
Hi can anyone please post explanation for question 3 of this MSR. why all the answers are NO? I am getting all as yes all of them are supported by passage individually!

Question no. 3 says we need to select yes ONLY IF we have the below information supported by each of the three tabs.

But, you can see that it is not a valid case for any of the three points provided. Hence, Answer is No for all.
_________________

Thanks.

Intern
Joined: 06 May 2016
Posts: 48
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 110

Re: Barras, Agna & Cussaia - any increase 5% or more... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2016, 17:55
Yeah we have to somehow justify OA but thats a very lame way of tricking people even though I read the stem properly was still in doubt what the hell it meant! supported by each of oh wait a min supported by EACH wtf!
BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 938
Location: India
GMAT 1: 670 Q50 V32
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.65
WE: Brand Management (Health Care)
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 233 [0], given: 32

Re: Barras, Agna & Cussaia - any increase 5% or more... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2016, 09:45
geek_mnnit wrote:
Yeah we have to somehow justify OA but thats a very lame way of tricking people even though I read the stem properly was still in doubt what the hell it meant! supported by each of oh wait a min supported by EACH wtf!

No, we are not justifying the answer somehow. This is how GMAC works. GMAC people know that many people are going to miss the word each and gonna mark the wrong answer.
_________________

Thanks.

Intern
Joined: 31 Dec 2015
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 4

Re: Barras, Agna & Cussaia - any increase 5% or more... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Nov 2016, 23:50
ngh007 wrote:

The main reason why people select no for this question is because they are not sure whether Cussaia grew grain or not. Now there are 2 things to notice:
1. Assumption - any 5% increase in food is likely due to an increase in import - that implies any food whose consumption has increased is not self grown.
2. If grain's consumption is increased then it must have been imported from either Agna or Cussia. if you think you cannot tell from whom import has been made then you would answer this as NO. But in the first table we are told that Agna grew no grain.

Hence this information - Agna grew no grain -- combined with the specified assumption tells us that import has been made from Cussia.
Intern
Joined: 12 Nov 2016
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Barras, Agna & Cussaia - any increase 5% or more... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Dec 2016, 08:35
ronr34 wrote:
An additional question that I am inserting here due to the fact that the tables are already here:

and the correct is in a square, mine are in the circle

Can someone give explanation on this I couldn't understand
Attachments

Screen Shot 2016-12-08 at 12.28.39 am.png [ 501.92 KiB | Viewed 846 times ]

Re: Barras, Agna & Cussaia - any increase 5% or more...   [#permalink] 07 Dec 2016, 08:35
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Any free resourse for reasoning 2 26 Jun 2014, 03:08
Any tips for those who are really struggling with IR? 0 07 Apr 2013, 15:03
8 in IR any use? 1 16 Mar 2013, 14:48
IR Literature / Advice ? Any suggestions? 4 10 Jan 2013, 11:43
1 Get Hardly any Practice Questions Right 6 30 May 2012, 20:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by