Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Baseball's World Series matches 2 teams against each other [#permalink]
29 Oct 2003, 09:34

6

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

29% (02:51) correct
71% (02:06) wrong based on 304 sessions

Baseball's World Series matches 2 teams against each other in a best-of-seven series. The first team to win four games wins the series and no subsequent games are played. If you have no special information about either of the teams, what is the probability that the World Series will consist of fewer than 7 games?

You have a total of eight different possibilities:

4-0 in favor of Team A
4-1 in favor of Team A
4-2 in favor of Team A
4-3 in favor of Team A
4-0 in favor of Team B
4-1 in favor of Team B
4-2 in favor of Team B
4-3 in favor of Team B

So the total number of choices for the game to end with less than 7 games = 6 different possibilities

How about this approach.....However I get a different answer

Prob (world series lasts fewer than 7 games) = 1 - Prob (world series lasts exactly 7 games)

Prob (Exactly 7 games) => After 6 games, Team A has exactly 3 wins & Team B has exactly 3 wins

Prob (Team A wins a game) = 1/2 Prob (Team B wins a game) = 1/2

Using Binomial probability (Assuming tied games are not possible)

Prob ( Team A or B has exactly 3 wins after 6 games) = 5/16

Prob ( Worls series lasts fewer than 7 games) = 1 - 5/16 = 11/16 = 68.75 %

Hi Mathew,

We can not use binomial probability theorm here. Because in order to use the binomial theorm, the number of trial (or games in this example) should be fixed. In this case, the number of trials (games) are not fixed. It depends on the outcome of each game. For example if team A wins all the first 4 games, then the series ends there..no further games. I think rkrish7's answer 75% is the correct answer.

In order to determine the probability that the World Series will last less than 7 games, we can first determine the probability that the World Series WILL last exactly 7 games and then subtract this value from 1.

In order for the World Series to last exactly 7 games, the first 6 games of the series must results in 3 wins and 3 losses for each team.

Let's analyze one way this could happen for Team 1:

Game 1 Game 2 Game 3 Game 4 Game 5 Game 6
T1 Wins T1 Wins T1 Wins T1 Loses T1 Loses T1 Loses

There are many other ways this could happen for Team 1. Using the permutation formula, there are 6!/(3!)(3!) = 20 ways for Team 1 to win 3 games and lose 3 games in the first 6 games.

Logically, there are also 20 ways for Team 2 to win 3 games and lose 3 games in the first 6 games.

Thus, there are a total of 40 ways for the World Series to last the full 7 games.

The probability that any one of these 40 ways occurs can be calculated from the fact that the probability of a team winning a game equals the probability of a team losing a game = 1/2.

Given that 7 distinct events must happen in any 7 game series, and that each of these events has a probability of 1/2, the probability that any one particular 7 game series occurs is.

Since there are 40 possible different 7 game series, the probability that the World Series will last exactly 7 games is:

Thus the probability that the World Series will last less than 7 games is 100% - 31.25% = 68.75%.

This was a tough question. Thanks to all of you who put up a great effort!

Dear Sir:

It is not kosher to steal the challenge questions from Manhattan GMAT (which are copyrighted) and post them in a public forum without attribution.

Thanks in advance for your future cooperation.

P.S. Since you have presented this problem as your own, please identify the error in the explanation (the answer is correct, but the explanation is a little faulty). _________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005 MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

In any case, you are NOT allowed to post the solution as it is private and reserved for the use of our clients. (The solution is password protected and available by subscription only. If you are one of our clients, I don't think Zeke would approve of you sharing his challenge problems and solutions with the world).

BTW, here is the "error" is the solution (the answer is fine, but IMO the explanation is slighty wrong):

"Using the permutation formula, there are 6!/(3!)(3!) = 20 ways for Team 1 to win 3 games and lose 3 games in the first 6 games.
Logically, there are also 20 ways for Team 2 to win 3 games and lose 3 games in the first 6 games. Thus, there are a total of 40 ways for the World Series to last the full 7 games."

While the conclusion that there are 40 ways to go the full seven is correct, it does not follow for the reason given.

The 20 ways for Team 1 to win 3 and lose 3 are the same 20 ways for Team 2 to win 3 and lose 3 (a win for Team 1 is a loss for Team 2). Hence the above method is actually double counting the ways that the two teams can go six games.

There are indeed 40 ways to go SEVEN games, NOT because "there are also 20 ways for Team 2 to win 3 games and lose 3 games...", but because there are two ways to resolve the tie in the seventh game, i.e., Team 1 either wins or loses. Hence, the 20 ways to go six are multipled by the 2 possible outcomes in game 7. _________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005 MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

"I would prefer that you did not post them at all.

In any case, you are NOT allowed to post the solution as it is private and reserved for the use of our clients. (The solution is password protected and available by subscription only. If you are one of our clients, I don't think Zeke would approve of you sharing his challenge problems and solutions with the world)."

Well, it might be "private" and "reserved for the use of (your) clients", and the solution might be "password protected" and "available by subscription only", but absolutely anyone can get access to the solution for free, as long as he or she furnishes or fabricates an email address. It's not like Titleist has taken a for-pay part of the site and redistributed it.

I am neither a lawyer nor an ethcist, but I fail to see any problem or harm if he takes a free question and reposts it with proper attribution. If I'm off base, please tell me why.

AkamaiBrah, I will respect your wishes and not repost any of the "free" questions available at Manhattan GMAT. All I wanted to do was to get other people's input on what the answer was because I was genuinely curious. I had no intention of taking 'credit' for the problem itself as you have accused me of doing. I posted the answer because there are people who participated and were genuinely interested in knowing the 'correct' answer. Again, I do apologize.

"I would prefer that you did not post them at all.

In any case, you are NOT allowed to post the solution as it is private and reserved for the use of our clients. (The solution is password protected and available by subscription only. If you are one of our clients, I don't think Zeke would approve of you sharing his challenge problems and solutions with the world)."

Well, it might be "private" and "reserved for the use of (your) clients", and the solution might be "password protected" and "available by subscription only", but absolutely anyone can get access to the solution for free, as long as he or she furnishes or fabricates an email address. It's not like Titleist has taken a for-pay part of the site and redistributed it.

I am neither a lawyer nor an ethcist, but I fail to see any problem or harm if he takes a free question and reposts it with proper attribution. If I'm off base, please tell me why.

First of all, thank you Titliest for promising to respect the copyright of Manhattan GMAT. I apologize if I came across as a hardass.

Let me address a couple of points:

1) Access to the solutions is not "free" but granted in exchange for your e-mail address. Just because you are not required to pay any money for something, does not make it free. There is an intangible "cost" to you for providing such information and certainly a "value" for MGMAT to obtain it. By publicly posting the solutions, you circumvent the right of MGMAT to receive "payment" for their intellectual property.

2) Copyright protection applies regardless of whether material is "free" or for pay. The network broadcast of a concert is free, but it would be illegal for me to incorporate any significant portion of it in my own work and redistribute it -- with or without attribution -- without express permission from the copyright holder.

3) While publishing other people's works in part with attribution is ordinarily acceptable (though often abused), publishing other people's works in toto certainly is not. Since MGMAT publishes just one problem per week, I can see a scenario where every problem and solution is published every week, essentially replicating the entire series of problems on a 3rd-party forum. That would not be cool.

4) Just because digital media makes it easy to duplicate and republish material, does not make it right.

While I cannot speak for the owner of MGMAT, IMO an acceptable way to post a challenge question is:

"I found this week's Manhattan GMAT challenge problem interesting and would like to share it with you:"

At which point, the forum is free to discuss the problem and post solutions in their own words. Those who want access to the official solution are welcome to subscribe to the service.

Finally, those of you who have been long time members of this forum may note that some of the challenge problems I post are indeed those from ManhattanGMAT. This is because I compose many of the MGMAT challenge questions and I use this forum as a "test bed" before submitting them to Manhattan GMAT for use on their web site. Hence, you already have VIP access to a significant number of the Manhattan GMAT challenge questions and solutions -- long before anyone else in the world. I am willing to continue doing this so long as the users of this forum will respect my copyright, and the copyright of MGMAT once any problem is published on its website.

Thank you. _________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005 MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

1) Access to the solutions is not "free" but granted in exchange for your e-mail address. Just because you are not required to pay any money for something, does not make it free. There is an intangible "cost" to you for providing such information and certainly a "value" for MGMAT to obtain it. By publicly posting the solutions, you circumvent the right of MGMAT to receive "payment" for their intellectual property.

Is someone who furnishes a fake email address committing theft, then?

First, I want to say thank you for clarifying your point. I also want to thank you and Manhattan GMAT for coming up with the most challenging questions I have seen from any other test prep service. I appreciate your presence here in this forum as a value-added resource. I will go ahead and post the weekly challenge problems in the format you have described (if I'm so compelled to do so). What drives me crazy about the M.G. weekly challenge problems is that after I take the usual => 2 mins to solve the problem, I have to wait a week for the answer.

First, I want to say thank you for clarifying your point. I also want to thank you and Manhattan GMAT for coming up with the most challenging questions I have seen from any other test prep service. I appreciate your presence here in this forum as a value-added resource. I will go ahead and post the weekly challenge problems in the format you have described (if I'm so compelled to do so). What drives me crazy about the M.G. weekly challenge problems is that after I take the usual => 2 mins to solve the problem, I have to wait a week for the answer.

Titleist

This is done on purpose to force you to actually think about it rather than punt and look up the answer. _________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005 MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

True. Even when I do come to an answer that I'm reasonably sure about, I still want to know for certain if it's correct. BTW, are these questions that much harder than the 700 level questions on the actual GMATs? Thanks again!

In any case, you are NOT allowed to post the solution as it is private and reserved for the use of our clients. (The solution is password protected and available by subscription only. If you are one of our clients, I don't think Zeke would approve of you sharing his challenge problems and solutions with the world).

BTW, here is the "error" is the solution (the answer is fine, but IMO the explanation is slighty wrong):

"Using the permutation formula, there are 6!/(3!)(3!) = 20 ways for Team 1 to win 3 games and lose 3 games in the first 6 games. Logically, there are also 20 ways for Team 2 to win 3 games and lose 3 games in the first 6 games. Thus, there are a total of 40 ways for the World Series to last the full 7 games."

While the conclusion that there are 40 ways to go the full seven is correct, it does not follow for the reason given.

The 20 ways for Team 1 to win 3 and lose 3 are the same 20 ways for Team 2 to win 3 and lose 3 (a win for Team 1 is a loss for Team 2). Hence the above method is actually double counting the ways that the two teams can go six games.

There are indeed 40 ways to go SEVEN games, NOT because "there are also 20 ways for Team 2 to win 3 games and lose 3 games...", but because there are two ways to resolve the tie in the seventh game, i.e., Team 1 either wins or loses. Hence, the 20 ways to go six are multipled by the 2 possible outcomes in game 7.

The solution provided is incorrect.

This question as written is wrong, and I doubt it is an official GMAT question.

A simple binomial probability (.5^7) doesn't work because an event such as LLLLWWW is clearly against the rules. All events must end in a 'W' (in respect to a given team). Since the last component of each event is never in question, it's the same as multiplying by 1. I believe the solution to such a problem should read something like this:

(say Cardinals vs. Rangers); There is only one way for the Rangers to sweep the cardinals: 4 consecutive wins (1) There are four ways for the Rangers to win in 5 games (write it out by hand if you like); this is the same as using 4p3 with repeating elements (4!/(3!*1!); (add 4 more) There are 10 ways for the Rangers to win in 6 games; in formula, I believe it would be 5p3 (5!/(3!*2!); (add 10 more) Lastly, there are 20 different ways for the Rangers to win in 7 games; this should be the equivalent of 6p3 (6!/(3!*3!); (add 20 more).

Again, the reason why the permutation is one less than the number of games (e.g., permutation of 6 for 7 games played) is because the series must logically end in a W for the winning team. Adding all of these possibilities up, there are 35 ways for the Rangers to win. There are an equal number of ways for the Cardinals to win, so there are 70 feasible ways for the series to play out. So, there are 40 ways that are 7 games played out of 70. 1- (40/70)= 3/7, or ~43%.

Using .5^7 to generate 128 possibilities generates 58 nonsensical events (e.g., LLLLLLW).

In order to determine the probability that the World Series will last less than 7 games, we can first determine the probability that the World Series WILL last exactly 7 games and then subtract this value from 1.

In order for the World Series to last exactly 7 games, the first 6 games of the series must results in 3 wins and 3 losses for each team.

Let's analyze one way this could happen for Team 1:

Game 1 Game 2 Game 3 Game 4 Game 5 Game 6 T1 Wins T1 Wins T1 Wins T1 Loses T1 Loses T1 Loses

There are many other ways this could happen for Team 1. Using the permutation formula, there are 6!/(3!)(3!) = 20 ways for Team 1 to win 3 games and lose 3 games in the first 6 games.

Logically, there are also 20 ways for Team 2 to win 3 games and lose 3 games in the first 6 games.

Thus, there are a total of 40 ways for the World Series to last the full 7 games.

The probability that any one of these 40 ways occurs can be calculated from the fact that the probability of a team winning a game equals the probability of a team losing a game = 1/2.

Given that 7 distinct events must happen in any 7 game series, and that each of these events has a probability of 1/2, the probability that any one particular 7 game series occurs is.

Since there are 40 possible different 7 game series, the probability that the World Series will last exactly 7 games is:

Thus the probability that the World Series will last less than 7 games is 100% - 31.25% = 68.75%.

The correct answer is D.

Hi there,

The explanation is not complete, could you please post correctly? I didn't quite understand the last part, seems that you are missing something

Re: Baseball's World Series matches 2 teams against each other [#permalink]
23 Mar 2014, 11:30

I have answer 42.86% but not matching the option.

Explanation: Let us find probability that game will consist of exactly 7 games. So there are 4 wins & 3 losses, but out of these wins, one win has to be last Ex: WWWLLL W possibilities = 6!/(3!*3!) = 20 (dividing so as to eliminate repetitions)

Now for all possible events, there are only four sub-possibilities : 1) exactly 4 games played, 2) exactly 5 games played, 3) exactly 6 games played, 4) exactly 7 games played 1) 4 games = total possibilities = 1 (WWWW) 2) 5 games = total possibilities = 4!/(3!*1!) = 4 (for ex: WWWL W) 3) 6 games = total possibilities = 5!/(3!*2!) = 10 (for ex: WWWLL W) 7) 7 games = as explained above = 20 So total possible outcomes = 1 + 4 + 10 + 20 = 35 prob of exact 7 games = 20/35 = 57.14%

prob of fewer than 7 games = 100 - 57.14 = 42.86%

gmatclubot

Re: Baseball's World Series matches 2 teams against each other
[#permalink]
23 Mar 2014, 11:30

The Stanford interview is an alumni-run interview. You give Stanford your current address and they reach out to alumni in your area to find one that can interview you...

Originally, I was supposed to have an in-person interview for Yale in New Haven, CT. However, as I mentioned in my last post about how to prepare for b-school interviews...

Interested in applying for an MBA? In the fourth and final part of our live QA series with guest expert Chioma Isiadinso, co-founder of consultancy Expartus and former admissions...