Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 31 Aug 2014, 23:44

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Because addictive drugs are phsyically harmful, their use by

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 700
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Because addictive drugs are phsyically harmful, their use by [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2005, 05:35
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
Because addictive drugs are phsyically harmful, their use by atheletes is never justified. Purists, however, claim that taking massive doses of even such nonaddictive drugs as aspirin and vitamins before competing shoudl also be prohibited because they are unnatural. This is ridiculous; almost everything in sports is unnatural, from high-tech running shoes to padded boxing gloves to highly-specialized body building machines. Yet, none of these is prohibited on the basis of it being unnatural. Furthermore, we should be attending to far more serious problems that plague modern sports and result in unnecessary deaths and injuries. Therefore, the use of nonaddictive drugs by atheletes shoudl not be prohibited.

Which one of the following statements, if true, would be the strongest challenge to the author's conclusion?

A) Massive doses of aspirin and vitamins enhance atheletic performance
B) Addictive drugs are just as unnatural as nonaddictive drugs like aspirin and vitamins
C) Unnecessary deaths and injuries occur in other walks of life besides modern sports
D) There would be more unnecessary deaths and injuries if it were not for running shoes, boxing gloves and bodybuilding machines
E) Taking massive doses of aspirin or vitamins can be physically harmful
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 219
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2005, 06:26
D is my answer
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 561
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2005, 09:12
yes, straight (D).
actually picked (E), until i reread (D).
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 May 2004
Posts: 313
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2005, 16:48
Actually I think E.

The authors conclusion is that we should focus on those items which are physically harmful and can cause injuries.
If Vitamins and asprin cause problems, then we should get rid of those.
He thinks there are no side effects.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 489
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2005, 17:12
i am going with B here. the author argues that the nonaddictive drugs and their misuses such as taking massive doses shouldnt be prohibited. he believes that they are NOT UNNATURAL. however he believes in the first sentence that addictive drugs are bad for athletes and therefore unnatural. if we plug ADDICTIVE DRUGS just as bad as NONADDICTIVE drugs which means that ADDICTIVE DRUGS = NONADDICTIVE in the arguement above it falls apart. B is the right answer.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 May 2004
Posts: 313
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2005, 17:56
Quote:
Furthermore, we should be attending to far more serious problems that plague modern sports and result in unnecessary deaths and injuries

If aspirin and vitamins in massive doses are physically harmful, then he would be in favor of banning them. See above quote. He is against addictive drugs for the same reason. See the first sentence in the paragraph.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1816
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2005, 18:09
I am going with E.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1736
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Addictive Drugs [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2005, 19:28
Hmmm confusing...E.

the conclusion: Therefore, the use of nonaddictive drugs such as aspirin or vitamins by atheletes should not be prohibited.

challange: Taking massive doses of aspirin or vitamins can be physically harmful.

make sense....
D seems trap...
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1711
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 12 Aug 2005, 06:20
I go with 'B'.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 331
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 12 Aug 2005, 06:41
E for me.

Use of non addictive drugs shud not be prohibited. The author's point: It is ridiculous to reject a non addictive drug because it is unnatural. When he concludes that these drugs should not be prohibited, he assumes that these drugs can only be unnatural and not life threatening. E challenges his assumption and reasoning. By his own words he wants the authorities to attend to serious problems like life threatening drug effects.

GA
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 68
Location: New York, NY
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 14 Aug 2005, 12:54
I'd choose E...

will the OA get posted soon?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2005
Posts: 36
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 14 Aug 2005, 13:28
I'd choose E...

Not B because we are are not talking about banning things that are unnatural, in that case the argument would not have mentioned shoes, gloves etc.

If we apply this same logic, E holds...
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 09 Nov 2004
Posts: 138
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 14 Aug 2005, 16:13
E based on the foll conclusion:

Therefore, the use of nonaddictive drugs by atheletes shoudl not be prohibited.

[/i]
_________________

Thanks!

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 May 2005
Posts: 374
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 14 Aug 2005, 16:39
E is my choice. When E is added to the argument, it basically uses the author's own line of reasoning to rebut it. Aspirin is hamrful, so he should be concerned about it and ban it.

D can actually strengthen the author's case. If massive doses of aspirin or similar drugs can help heal a person, then they are similar to running shoes, boxing gloves etc., then they obviously should not be banned.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 910
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 15 Aug 2005, 07:24
What's the difference between A and E?
by the way i pick E, but doesn't E and A serve the same purpose?
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Posts: 606
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 15 Aug 2005, 13:32
I will take A. E seems to be tangential. So many thinks in sports are harmful anyway.
_________________

Regards, S

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 486
Location: Chicago
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 15 Aug 2005, 14:46
IMO clearly D
_________________

Fear Mediocrity, Respect Ignorance

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 700
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 16 Aug 2005, 04:46
The OA is E. I dont have OE becuase its from the "Official LSAT Preptest" material. I know the quality of questions are legit.

For those of you who chose AC E over D, why wouldnt a "causal" arugement be applicable. The author tries to strengthen his argument by saying "hey asprin is very much like all other unatural stuff - shoes, etc, etc". But AC D is saying, "they arent the same because lack of shoes, equipment, etc, etc results in more deaths".
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 700
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 16 Aug 2005, 04:51
I'll post another question [I know posting 2 different questions within the same thread is a No No, but i want to drive home a point and this question will help us better understand AC D in the context of the argument].

For those of you who chose E [over D], and anyone else too, could you please try the following question:

High School students who feel that they are not succeeding in school often drop out before graduating and go to work. Last year, however, the city's high school dropout rate was significantly lower than the previous year's rate. This is encouraging evidence that the program instituted two years ago to improve the morale of high school students has begun to take effect to reduce dropouts.

Which of the following if true about the last year, most seriously wekanes the argument?

A) There was a recession that caused a high level of unemployment in the city
B) The morale of students who dropped out of high school had been low even before they reached high school
C) As in the preceding year, more high school students remained in school than dropped out
D) High schools in the city established placement offices to assist their graduates in obtaining employmen
E) The antidropout program was primarily aimed at improving students' morale in those high schools with the highest dropout rates
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 09 Nov 2004
Posts: 138
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 16 Aug 2005, 05:02
D?
_________________

Thanks!

  [#permalink] 16 Aug 2005, 05:02
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
a researcher studying drug addicts found that,on AK47 5 13 Oct 2006, 01:24
A researcher studying drug addicts found that, on average, govinam 16 18 Sep 2006, 15:11
14 Most recovering heroin addicts seek to be free of drug u2lover 25 03 Aug 2006, 12:29
Most recovering heroin addicts seek to be free of drug nakib77 2 10 Dec 2005, 04:23
Experts publish their posts in the topic most recovering heroin addicts seek to be free of drug christoph 32 27 Oct 2005, 03:58
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Because addictive drugs are phsyically harmful, their use by

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 29 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.