Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Because sales dropped in the wake of the sub-prime mortgage [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Mar 2014, 20:20

12

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

54% (01:44) correct
46% (00:38) wrong based on 286 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Because sales dropped in the wake of the sub-prime mortgage crisis, in 2009 Vendiflex Corporation slashed its workforce to 2,500, almost 80% fewer than that of 2008.

A. almost 80% fewer than that of 2008 B. almost 80% fewer than 2008 C. almost 80% less than 2008 D. almost 80% less than the 2008 workforce E. almost 80% less than that of the 2008 workforce

Good question exemplifying comparison concept usage. Hope you like this one

Re: Because sales dropped in the wake of the sub-prime mortgage [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Mar 2014, 06:19

1

This post received KUDOS

3

This post was BOOKMARKED

Whenever you are comparing countable items, such as number of people, you use terms, such as 'fewer'. But when you are comparing percentages of items then you use terms,such as 'less'.

Here are some links from Manhattan that will help you understand better. Some explanations are given by Stacey and the great ,Ron.

Re: Because sales dropped in the wake of the sub-prime mortgage [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Jun 2014, 15:39

Hi Mike,

Can you please shed some light on this concept of few/less in cases where countable nouns are grouped.

mba1382 wrote:

Because sales dropped in the wake of the sub-prime mortgage crisis, in 2009 Vendiflex Corporation slashed its workforce to 2,500, almost 80% fewer than that of 2008.

A. almost 80% fewer than that of 2008 B. almost 80% fewer than 2008 C. almost 80% less than 2008 D. almost 80% less than the 2008 workforce E. almost 80% less than that of the 2008 workforce

Good question exemplifying comparison concept usage. Hope you like this one

Re: Because sales dropped in the wake of the sub-prime mortgage [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Jun 2016, 05:29

Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Because sales dropped in the wake of the sub-prime mortgage [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Jun 2016, 07:22

Because sales dropped in the wake of the sub-prime mortgage crisis, in 2009 Vendiflex Corporation slashed its workforce to 2,500, almost 80% fewer than that of 2008.

A. almost 80% fewer than that of 2008 -------- workforce is uncountable , we can count employee eg : 1 employee , 2 employee but, we can't say 1 workforce , 2 workforce . B. almost 80% fewer than 2008 ------- same as A . Also, fewer than 2008 ( what of 2008 ) wrong comparison C. almost 80% less than 2008 ------- Less than 2008 ( what of 2008 ) wrong comparison D. almost 80% less than the 2008 workforce E. almost 80% less than that of the 2008 workforce

Because sales dropped in the wake of the sub-prime mortgage [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Jun 2016, 07:27

mba1382 wrote:

Because sales dropped in the wake of the sub-prime mortgage crisis, in 2009 Vendiflex Corporation slashed its workforce to 2,500, almost 80% fewer than that of 2008.

A. almost 80% fewer than that of 2008 B. almost 80% fewer than 2008 C. almost 80% less than 2008 D. almost 80% less than the 2008 workforce E. almost 80% less than that of the 2008 workforce

Good question exemplifying comparison concept usage. Hope you like this one

Split here is -

1. Less Vs Fewer - Less is preferred here 2. Correct Comparison - Less than is the correct comparison

That of in (E) is incorrect because that has no clear referent... Hence correct answer is (D) _________________

Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...