Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 31 Aug 2016, 23:22

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Because the government of Laconia provided considerable tax

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 276
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Other
GPA: 2.44
WE: Project Management (Telecommunications)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 602 [1] , given: 325

Because the government of Laconia provided considerable tax [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2013, 16:05
1
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

42% (02:36) correct 58% (01:40) wrong based on 316 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Because the government of Laconia provided considerable tax incentives to farmers, many newspapers, expecting that these tax incentives would allow farmers to invest more into their businesses and improve the profitability of Laconia’s agricultural sector, published articles stating that Laconian agriculture would soon become profitable. However, these newspapers did not consider that the Laconian government provides tax incentives only to support the weakest segments of economy, which are not likely to become profitable any time soon.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
(A)The first provides evidence supporting the conclusion of the argument; the second gives a reason for questioning the conclusion.
(B)The first provides evidence supporting the conclusion; the second is the conclusion of the argument.
(C)The first is a statement explained by the argument; the second provides evidence in support of that statement.
(D)The first is a statement opposed by the argument as a whole; the second is evidence opposing that statement.
(E)The first is a statement explained by the argument as a whole; the second provides evidence opposing that statement.

Really appreciate a detailed explanation .
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by guerrero25 on 29 Sep 2013, 23:03, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Joined: 14 Apr 2012
Posts: 17
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 12

Re: Because the government of Laconia provided considerable tax [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2013, 18:07
I think it is C. Please post OA.

If my answer is correct, I will post the reasoning.
Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 276
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Other
GPA: 2.44
WE: Project Management (Telecommunications)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 602 [0], given: 325

Re: Because the government of Laconia provided considerable tax [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2013, 23:03
krakgmat wrote:
I think it is C. Please post OA.

If my answer is correct, I will post the reasoning.

thanks for the attempt .. Edited the OA
VP
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1420
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Followers: 171

Kudos [?]: 1185 [0], given: 62

Re: Because the government of Laconia provided considerable tax [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Sep 2013, 00:29
guerrero25 wrote:
Because the government of Laconia provided considerable tax incentives to farmers, many newspapers, expecting that these tax incentives would allow farmers to invest more into their businesses and improve the profitability of Laconia’s agricultural sector, published articles stating that Laconian agriculture would soon become profitable. However, these newspapers did not consider that the Laconian government provides tax incentives only to support the weakest segments of economy, which are not likely to become profitable any time soon.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
(A)The first provides evidence supporting the conclusion of the argument; the second gives a reason for questioning the conclusion.
(B)The first provides evidence supporting the conclusion; the second is the conclusion of the argument.
(C)The first is a statement explained by the argument; the second provides evidence in support of that statement.
(D)The first is a statement opposed by the argument as a whole; the second is evidence opposing that statement.
(E)The first is a statement explained by the argument as a whole; the second provides evidence opposing that statement.

Really appreciate a detailed explanation .

Hi Guerrero,
In this question, try to figure out what is premise, counter premise and conclusion.
Premise: First boldface
Conclusion: Many newspaper articles published that Lanconian agriculture will become profitable.
Counter Premise: This is what author of this CR states. He mentions that the newspapers did not consider another aspect, and what these newspapers concluded may not be true.

P.S.: Do mention the source please
_________________
Intern
Joined: 30 Sep 2013
Posts: 6
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Because the government of Laconia provided considerable tax [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Sep 2013, 01:28
Hi, This tread is awesome for me....Thanks...
Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 2994
Followers: 717

Kudos [?]: 5779 [0], given: 971

Re: Because the government of Laconia provided considerable tax [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Sep 2013, 04:55
what is the source ??

it is a bit easy for a bold question
_________________
Intern
Joined: 05 Sep 2012
Posts: 9
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT 1: 560 Q49 V19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Investment Banking (Investment Banking)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [1] , given: 4

Re: Because the government of Laconia provided considerable tax [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Oct 2013, 23:02
1
KUDOS
Hi guerrero25, for these bold face questions, i suggest that you crack the stimulus of ur question before going to the answer choice. Once, u identify premise, conclusion n counter premise, u will find it easier to choose a correct answer. In this particular question:
Premise: the government provided tax incentives to farmers, many newspapers, expecting that these tax incentives would allow farmers to invest more and improve the profitability of Laconia’s agricultural sector.
Conclusion: Laconian agriculture would soon become profitable
Counter premise: HOWEVER, these newspapers did not consider that the Laconian government only supports the weakest segments of economy, not likely to become profitable any time soon.

After cracking the stimulus, u will clearly see that 1st Bold face lies on Premise which supports the conclusion and 2nd Bold face lies on the counter premises that opposes the conclusion. Saying in other way, they are on the opposite positions. what we need is to find an answer that correctly describes these positions.

(A)The first provides evidence supporting the conclusion of the argument; the second gives a reason for questioning the conclusion.
=> Good. They are in the opposite sites. A good Contender.
(B)The first provides evidence supporting the conclusion; the second is the conclusion of the argument.
=> 1st bold face's role is correct but 2nd isnt the conclusion so we can eliminate this choice safely.
(C)The first is a statement explained by the argument; the second provides evidence in support of that statement.
=> They are on the same side again. Eliminate.
(D)The first is a statement opposed by the argument as a whole; the second is evidence opposing that statement.
=> 1st correct, 2nd fails to describe its role.
(E)The first is a statement explained by the argument as a whole; the second provides evidence opposing that statement.
=> This is an Shell Game answer. However, the argument doesnt explain any statement. Instead, it claims that
"Laconian agriculture would soon become profitable". The 2nd is opposing the conclusion not the statement.

Hence, A is correct.

Hope it helps.
Intern
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 8

Re: Because the government of Laconia provided considerable tax [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2013, 05:42
vaodeanhem wrote:
Hi guerrero25, for these bold face questions, i suggest that you crack the stimulus of ur question before going to the answer choice. Once, u identify premise, conclusion n counter premise, u will find it easier to choose a correct answer. In this particular question:
Premise: the government provided tax incentives to farmers, many newspapers, expecting that these tax incentives would allow farmers to invest more and improve the profitability of Laconia’s agricultural sector.
Conclusion: Laconian agriculture would soon become profitable
Counter premise: HOWEVER, these newspapers did not consider that the Laconian government only supports the weakest segments of economy, not likely to become profitable any time soon.

After cracking the stimulus, u will clearly see that 1st Bold face lies on Premise which supports the conclusion and 2nd Bold face lies on the counter premises that opposes the conclusion. Saying in other way, they are on the opposite positions. what we need is to find an answer that correctly describes these positions.

(A)The first provides evidence supporting the conclusion of the argument; the second gives a reason for questioning the conclusion.
=> Good. They are in the opposite sites. A good Contender.
(B)The first provides evidence supporting the conclusion; the second is the conclusion of the argument.
=> 1st bold face's role is correct but 2nd isnt the conclusion so we can eliminate this choice safely.
(C)The first is a statement explained by the argument; the second provides evidence in support of that statement.
=> They are on the same side again. Eliminate.
(D)The first is a statement opposed by the argument as a whole; the second is evidence opposing that statement.
=> 1st correct, 2nd fails to describe its role.
(E)The first is a statement explained by the argument as a whole; the second provides evidence opposing that statement.
=> This is an Shell Game answer. However, the argument doesnt explain any statement. Instead, it claims that
"Laconian agriculture would soon become profitable". The 2nd is opposing the conclusion not the statement.

Hence, A is correct.

Hope it helps.

Excellent tear Down! Loved your explanation. Thanks!
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 9333
Followers: 808

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

Re: Because the government of Laconia provided considerable tax [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2015, 06:43
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Because the government of Laconia provided considerable tax   [#permalink] 17 Jan 2015, 06:43
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Because of an economic downturn in Laconia 1 16 Aug 2016, 04:36
2 Lsat: The government provides insurance for individuals 1 17 Sep 2014, 04:03
5 Politician: Early in 2009, the government of Laconia tripled 7 09 Jun 2013, 19:51
6 State tax officials, having had considerable success in 21 21 Jul 2011, 16:10
4 The government has no right to tax earnings from labor. 10 15 Jul 2010, 12:04
Display posts from previous: Sort by