Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 19 Jun 2013, 18:38
Customize  |  Hide

Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
Joined: 03 Jul 2012
Posts: 94
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GPA: 3.04
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 7

Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in [#permalink] New post 01 Sep 2012, 07:02
00:00

Question Stats:

24% (02:18) correct 75% (34:50) wrong based on 29 sessions
Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in a job discrimination case must prove not only that the employer lied about the reasons for dismissal but also that those reasons were discriminatory, plaintiffs in such cases fear that they will have no higher court that they can appeal to when their cases are decided in lower courts.

that they can appeal to when their cases are
to which to appeal after their cases have been
for appealing if their case has been
to which they can appeal if their case is
that their cases can appeal, if they have been
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 143
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 97

GMAT Tests User
Re: Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in [#permalink] New post 01 Sep 2012, 10:45
C and D are out because the earlier part of the sentence refers to cases NOT case

plaintiffs in such cases fear that they will have no higher court

E has a repetitive that in it - that has no correct reference
plaintiffs in such cases fear that they will have no higher court that their cases can appeal

A when their cases are is referring to specific point on time no time mentioned in the sentence

thats hovv i ruled these out
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Posts: 130
Location: United States
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 5

Reviews Badge
Re: Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in [#permalink] New post 01 Sep 2012, 12:11
mehulsayani wrote:
Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in a job discrimination case must prove not only that the employer lied about the reasons for dismissal but also that those reasons were discriminatory, plaintiffs in such cases fear that they will have no higher court that they can appeal to when their cases are decided in lower courts.

that they can appeal to when their cases are
to which to appeal after their cases have been
for appealing if their case has been
to which they can appeal if their case is
that their cases can appeal, if they have been



I've never seen the usage - to which to appeal , and in the context, it makes little sense to me.

I will go with A.

Any clarifications please?

Best,
...
Re: Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in   [#permalink] 01 Sep 2012, 12:11
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in tyagel 9 21 Oct 2004, 14:15
Popular new posts 1 Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in GK_Gmat 13 09 Jan 2008, 08:38
New posts 2 Experts publish their posts in the topic Q. Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution RohitKalla 9 06 Jul 2011, 13:39
New posts 1 Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in Jp27 4 29 Oct 2012, 22:43
New posts 1 Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in nelz007 5 20 Nov 2012, 06:29
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.