Before the regime change, the National Museum regularly : PS Archive
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 07 Dec 2016, 07:47
GMAT Club Tests

Chicago-Booth

is Releasing R1 Admission Decisions | Keep Watch on App Tracker | Join Chat Room2 for Live Updates


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Before the regime change, the National Museum regularly

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 1493
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 0

Before the regime change, the National Museum regularly [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jan 2005, 22:26
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

Before the regime change, the National Museum regularly displayed only one third of the artifacts in its collection; the other two thirds were kept in storage. The National Museum’s curator estimates that one seventh to one fifth of the artifacts in the museum’s collection disappeared during the regime change. If the National Museum now wishes to display the same number of artifacts as it did before the regime change, and if none of the missing artifacts are recovered, then the museum will keep in storage:


A. 4/5 to 6/7 of the artifacts in its collection.

B. 9/14 to 13/20 of the artifacts in its collection.

C. 3/5 to 5/7 of the artifacts in its collection.

D. 7/12 to 11/18 of the artifacts in its collection..

E. 7/18 to 5/12 of the artifacts in its collection.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 905
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2005, 07:14
I got 7/13 and 3/5. None of the answer choice so i must be doing something wrong.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 284
Location: Germany
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2005, 08:03
can be worked with algebraic expression, but a quicker way would be to work with hypothetical (yet consistent) numbers.

A quick look would reveal that 2100 can be used as the original number of total artifacts (before the regime change). Hence, the number of artifacts displayed = 700 and that kept in store = 1400.

During the regime change, 300 to 420 artifcats went missing.

Therefore, the remaining number of artifactsis between

(2100 - 300 = 1800) and (2100 - 420 = 1680)

In order to display the same number of artifacts as before the regime change (700), the fraction that needs to be kept in storage = (1800 - 700 = 1100) to (1680 - 700 = 980).

=> the fraction of artifacts in storage = (1100/1800 = 11/18) to (980/1680 = 7/12), hence the correct answer is D
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 1488
Location: Germany
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 325 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2005, 08:24
D it is ?

lets assume 105 artifacts.

1. 1/3 of 105 are displayed = 35
2. 2/3 of 105 are storaged = 70
3. 1/7 to 1/5 disappaered => 15 to 21
4. 105 - 15 = 90 - 35 = 55 => x * 90 = 55 => x = 55/90 = 11/18
5. 105 - 21 = 84 -35 = 49 => x * 84 = 49 => 49 /84 = 7/12
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 905
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2005, 08:27
Thanks for the explanation. I had used plugging of number approach however i didn't plug in number that was a multiple of 7 (don't ask me why :P ). Instead i plugged in 30 thus the reason why i was off.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 61
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2005, 09:59
christoph wrote:
D it is ?

lets assume 105 artifacts.

1. 1/3 of 105 are displayed = 35
2. 2/3 of 105 are storaged = 70
3. 1/7 to 1/5 disappaered => 15 to 21
4. 105 - 15 = 90 - 35 = 55 => x * 90 = 55 => x = 55/90 = 11/18
5. 105 - 21 = 84 -35 = 49 => x * 84 = 49 => 49 /84 = 7/12


I also used 105 also because 7*5*3=105. I said that 6/7 to 4/5 are left, then subtracted 35 from the respective numbers. Other than that I did it the same way as you.
  [#permalink] 03 Jan 2005, 09:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Before the regime change, the National Museum regularly

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.