|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 14 Oct 2008
Posts: 31
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 0
|
Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in [#permalink]
09 Feb 2009, 01:26
Question Stats:
80% (01:17) correct
20% (02:08) wrong based on 0 sessions
Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee has lived in England and Canada, and first came to the United States in 1961 to study at the Iowa Writers' Workshop. (A) Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee has (B) Having been a United States citizen since 1988, she was born in Calcutta in 1940; author Bharati Mukherjee (C) Born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee became a United States citizen in 1988; she has (D) Being born in Calcutta in 1940 and having been a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee (E) Having been born in Calcutta in 1940 and being a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 842
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
19
[0], given: 0
|
Re: Being a United States citizen [#permalink]
09 Feb 2009, 01:41
C, i think
others sound awkward
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2008
Posts: 432
Schools: Kellogg Class of 2012
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
55
[0], given: 4
|
Re: Being a United States citizen [#permalink]
09 Feb 2009, 09:38
See nothing wrong with A
Cheers, Unplugged
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1842
Location: New York
Followers: 20
Kudos [?]:
291
[1] , given: 5
|
Re: Being a United States citizen [#permalink]
09 Feb 2009, 10:42
1
This post received KUDOS
First, I chose D . I chose C after reading the below explanation. I found the following explantion from another forum..When I saw this question first time. I was skeptical about the usage of present perfect in option C "has lived in England and Canda" that could mean that she is living in England and Canada. Then I searched around and got this from info from a Manhattan Staff
"That is an interesting question. You are correct that the present perfect is used to discuss an event that began at some point in the past and continues to the present moment. Although I understand your interpretation that this "event" is where the author lived, the intention of the sentence is to use the entire life of the author as the "event."
For example, in my life I have lived in Boston, Atlanta, Colorado, and California. This does not mean, however, that I still live in each of these places. As my life is an ongoing event, the present perfect is an appropriate verb tense."
_________________
Your attitude determines your altitude Smiling wins more friends than frowning
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1593
Followers: 7
Kudos [?]:
131
[0], given: 0
|
Re: Being a United States citizen [#permalink]
09 Feb 2009, 11:04
x2suresh wrote: First, I chose D . I chose C after reading the below explanation.
I found the following explantion from another forum..When I saw this question first time. I was skeptical about the usage of present perfect in option C "has lived in England and Canda" that could mean that she is living in England and Canada. Then I searched around and got this from info from a Manhattan Staff
"That is an interesting question. You are correct that the present perfect is used to discuss an event that began at some point in the past and continues to the present moment. Although I understand your interpretation that this "event" is where the author lived, the intention of the sentence is to use the entire life of the author as the "event."
For example, in my life I have lived in Boston, Atlanta, Colorado, and California. This does not mean, however, that I still live in each of these places. As my life is an ongoing event, the present perfect is an appropriate verb tense." But is "and came to..." in C parallel with "has lived...."?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 14 Oct 2008
Posts: 31
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 0
|
Re: Being a United States citizen [#permalink]
09 Feb 2009, 14:06
OA is c
i also got confused with she has.....but now clear
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 09 Feb 2009
Posts: 12
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Re: Being a United States citizen [#permalink]
09 Feb 2009, 14:19
x2suresh wrote: First, I chose D . I chose C after reading the below explanation.
I found the following explantion from another forum..When I saw this question first time. I was skeptical about the usage of present perfect in option C "has lived in England and Canda" that could mean that she is living in England and Canada. Then I searched around and got this from info from a Manhattan Staff
"That is an interesting question. You are correct that the present perfect is used to discuss an event that began at some point in the past and continues to the present moment. Although I understand your interpretation that this "event" is where the author lived, the intention of the sentence is to use the entire life of the author as the "event."
For example, in my life I have lived in Boston, Atlanta, Colorado, and California. This does not mean, however, that I still live in each of these places. As my life is an ongoing event, the present perfect is an appropriate verb tense." I got confused with "has lived" Thanks for the info +1
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1400
Followers: 8
Kudos [?]:
84
[0], given: 10
|
Re: SC Being a United States citizen [#permalink]
16 May 2011, 00:30
between A and C, modifier error in A as being a USA .. and born are not even parallel too. C is clean
_________________
Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/ Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 06 Oct 2009
Posts: 99
Location: Mexico
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
GMAT 1: 610 Q42 V34
GPA: 3.85
WE: Sales (Commercial Banking)
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
18
[0], given: 3
|
Re: Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in [#permalink]
17 May 2012, 13:48
Another use of present perfect is to refer to events that happened in an idetermined time in the past..
I have been in France
Keep walking
|
|
|
|
|
|
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1083
Followers: 510
Kudos [?]:
1057
[0], given: 131
|
Re: Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in [#permalink]
18 May 2012, 08:39
Hi All, Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee has lived in England and Canada, and first came to the United States in 1961 to study at the Iowa Writers' Workshop.  • Author Bharati Mukherjee was born in Calcutta in 1940. • She first came to the US in 1961 to study at the Iowa Writers’ Workshop. • She became the US citizen in 1988. • She has also lived in England and Canada. Error Analysis: • The opening verb-ing modifier connects the author being a US citizen and being born in 1940 to her living in England and Canada, illogically implying that because she is a US citizen and because she was born in 1940, she lived in Eng and Canada and she first came to US to study in 1961. Modifier error. o Being a singer and not being an actress, Jennifer Lopez shot to instant fame. o Even though the OG sentence is grammatically correct, it’s not logical. So when we read a sentence, we should make sure it communicates logical meaning. POE:Choice A: Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee has: Incorrect for the reason stated above. Choice B: Having been a United States citizen since 1988, she was born in Calcutta in 1940; author Bharati Mukherjee: Incorrect. a. “having been…” now suggests that the author got over with being the US citizen since 1988 and then she took birth in 1940. This is absolutely illogical. b. The first IC has just the pronoun “she”. The antecedent is actually introduced in the second IC. Choice C: Born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee became a United States citizen in 1988; she has: Correct. The opening modifier correctly modifies the author. The IC after semicolon correctly gives additional information as to which other countries she has stayed in. Choice D: Being born in Calcutta in 1940 and having been a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee: Incorrect. Same modifier error as in A. Choice E: Having been born in Calcutta in 1940 and being a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee: Incorrect. Same modifier error as in A. Hope this helps. Thanks. Shraddha
_________________
Free trial:Click here to start free trial (100+ free practice questions) Free Session (May 25): : Learn how to master Sentence Correction. Click here to attend.
  
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Status: Gonna rock this time!!!
Joined: 22 Jul 2012
Posts: 551
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q43 V34 GMAT 2: 630 Q47 V29
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
13
[0], given: 560
|
Re: Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in [#permalink]
09 Jan 2013, 03:25
egmat wrote: Hi All, Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee has lived in England and Canada, and first came to the United States in 1961 to study at the Iowa Writers' Workshop.  • Author Bharati Mukherjee was born in Calcutta in 1940. • She first came to the US in 1961 to study at the Iowa Writers’ Workshop. • She became the US citizen in 1988. • She has also lived in England and Canada. Error Analysis: • The opening verb-ing modifier connects the author being a US citizen and being born in 1940 to her living in England and Canada, illogically implying that because she is a US citizen and because she was born in 1940, she lived in Eng and Canada and she first came to US to study in 1961. Modifier error. o Being a singer and not being an actress, Jennifer Lopez shot to instant fame. o Even though the OG sentence is grammatically correct, it’s not logical. So when we read a sentence, we should make sure it communicates logical meaning. POE:Choice A: Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee has: Incorrect for the reason stated above. Choice B: Having been a United States citizen since 1988, she was born in Calcutta in 1940; author Bharati Mukherjee: Incorrect. a. “having been…” now suggests that the author got over with being the US citizen since 1988 and then she took birth in 1940. This is absolutely illogical. b. The first IC has just the pronoun “she”. The antecedent is actually introduced in the second IC. Choice C: Born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee became a United States citizen in 1988; she has: Correct. The opening modifier correctly modifies the author. The IC after semicolon correctly gives additional information as to which other countries she has stayed in. Choice D: Being born in Calcutta in 1940 and having been a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee: Incorrect. Same modifier error as in A. Choice E: Having been born in Calcutta in 1940 and being a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee: Incorrect. Same modifier error as in A. Hope this helps. Thanks. Shraddha Hi Shraddha, B is wrong because there 's no referent for she as she is mentioned in another sentence. We have the same issue in C as well.. No mention of referent of C in the 2nd sentence after the semicolon. How is then that C is right?
_________________
hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things. And no good thing ever dies.
Who says you need a 700 ?Check this out : http://gmatclub.com/forum/who-says-you-need-a-149706.html#p1201595
My GMAT Journey : end-of-my-gmat-journey-149328.html#p1198742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in
[#permalink]
09 Jan 2013, 03:25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, Marcab, Narenn, GetThisDone
|