Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

in order to solve this problem - we need to know that if we have x toppings then the sum of ways we can choose toppings on a certain pizza equal to 2^x.

your formula state that for 2 toppings one can have 2^2=4 different pizza
that is A, B, AB, BA
but pertaining to pizza, BA and AB is exactly the same thing so there must be only 3 ways to make pizza with 2 toppings and not 4.

I find D for the same reason of UMB, and i am also wondering why x=4 in one statement equal 7 in the other???

your formula state that for 2 toppings one can have 2^2=4 different pizza that is A, B, AB, BA but pertaining to pizza, BA and AB is exactly the same thing so there must be only 3 ways to make pizza with 2 toppings and not 4.

I find D for the same reason of UMB, and i am also wondering why x=4 in one statement equal 7 in the other???

Hello boubi:

A = topping 1
B = topping 2

way 1 = none
way 2 = A
way 3 = B
way 4 = AB (or BA it's the same)

2^2 = 4

this formula works for any number of toppings

A = topping 1
B = topping 2
C = topping 3

way 1 = none
way 2 = A
way 3 = B
way 4 = C
way 5 = AB
way 6 = AC
way 7 = BC
way 8 = ACB

n-#of different pizzas that can be made with (x-2) and 2 toppings. then (x-2)*n=2*n x=4.

Statement2) SUFF. p-#of pizzas that can be made with 4 toppings. (x+1)C4 * p=2* [xC4]*p "combination". x+1=2*[x-3] x=7

I wonder if D then why X=4 and X=7 are different.

UMB! for statement 2, i think that our reasoning was wrong.
*C4 is the way to choose how many pizza can you make with a group of 4 topping and only 4. but we forgot that we can makee with 4 toppings *C3 *C2 an *C1 pizzas.

I'm not english native speaker and don't know pizza cooking technology. Can anybody explain me what topping is and why for one pizza we can use 0, 1 or 2 toppings. Why not 3 or 4?

I'm not english native speaker and don't know pizza cooking technology. Can anybody explain me what topping is and why for one pizza we can use 0, 1 or 2 toppings. Why not 3 or 4?

1) not sufficient as xCy always equal to xC(x-y)
2) sufficient: 2*xC4 = (x+1)C4 , x=7

Squirrel, you shouldn't take into consideration option of 1,2, 3 etc toppings.
Question asks about combinations - how many pizzas can we make using (x-2) toppings if there are totally x toppings.

your formula state that for 2 toppings one can have 2^2=4 different pizza that is A, B, AB, BA but pertaining to pizza, BA and AB is exactly the same thing so there must be only 3 ways to make pizza with 2 toppings and not 4.

I find D for the same reason of UMB, and i am also wondering why x=4 in one statement equal 7 in the other???

it is not obligatory that two answers must be equal, when you state that each answer is sufficient you mean that they are sufficient isolated from each other, information in statement two is not related to information in statement 1.

Beth’s pizzeria offers x different toppings. What is the value of x?

(1) There are an equal number of different pizzas that can be made with (x − 2) toppings as there are different pizzas with just 2 toppings.

(2) If the pizzeria were to add one additional topping, the number of different pizzas that could be made with 4 toppings would double.

1. (x-2) = 2 so x = 4 There's no other number of toppings that will give you exact number of options as having 2 toppings except for 2. Even though they're disagreeing over there being 3 or 4 options, it doesn't really matter. The fact is, to get the same number of options as with 2 toppings you need to have 2 toppings.

and you can have 4 options with 2 toppings (call them x and y) assuming neither is an option.

1. x only 2. y only 3. both x and y 4. neither x nor y

2. The number of options for a 4 topping pizza: 4C4 = 1 5C4 = 5

5C4 = 5 6C4 = 15

6C4 = 15 7C4 = 35

7C4 = 35 8C4 = 70 WORKS

Only adding 1 more topping to a current list of 7 toppings will double the number of 4 topping pizzas.

Unless I'm mistaken we are getting sufficient answers from each statement and the answers are different from each other. I've never seen this before. Is this allowed on the GMAT?

statement 1 and 2 cannot lead to contradicting answers or several answers.

do you see any flaws in how I approached the problem? I'm getting contradicting answers and am pretty confident in my work.

Maybe it's a made up question?

1. is pretty clear and I came to the same solution 2. i tought pC(x+1)=2pC4...then, for any value of p would find the value of x....anyway it would be a very tough equation, although we don't need to calculate it.

I didn't actually catch the rule about 2^n toppings ! can someone explain that to me clearly. I appreciate.

for n toppings there are 2^n ways to make a pizza. Example:

1 topping 2^1 = 2 (choices are with topping or without 2 toppings 2^2 = 4 (topping 1, topping 2, both or neither) 3 toppings 2^3 = 8 (t1, t2, t3, t1 and t2, t1 and t3, t2 and t3, t1, t2, and t3, no toppings)

This happens because you have two choices for each topping, either you put it on the pizza or you don't. The more toppings you have the more choices you end up with.

this isn't the same thing we're doing for statement 2 though because we can only use 4 toppings, no more no less when making our pizza. In that case it's NC4 (where N = number of available toppings). order doesn't matter since it's all going on the pizza.

I couldn’t help myself but stay impressed. young leader who can now basically speak Chinese and handle things alone (I’m Korean Canadian by the way, so...