Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 27 Aug 2014, 00:56

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Between 1977 and 1989, the percentage of income paid to

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
3 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2003
Posts: 7
Location: Chennai
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [3] , given: 0

Between 1977 and 1989, the percentage of income paid to [#permalink] New post 21 Aug 2003, 00:31
3
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

47% (02:36) correct 53% (01:50) wrong based on 307 sessions
Between 1977 and 1989, the percentage of income paid to federal taxes by the richest one percent of Americans decreased from 40 percent to 25 percent. By the end of that same period, however, the richest one percent of Americans were paying a larger proportion of all federal tax revenues from 12.7 percent in 1977 to 16.2 percent in 1989.

Which of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of the discrepancy described above ?

(A) Between 1977 and 1989, the IRS increased the percentage of its staff members responsible for audits and tax collection.

(B) Between 1977 and 1989, the before-tax income of the richest one percent of Americans increased by over 75 percent when adjusted for inflation.

(C) Between 1977 and 1989, many of the richest one percent of Americans shifted their investments from taxable to untaxable.

(D) Between 1977 and 1989, the tax rate paid by middle-income Americans was reduced, but several tax loopholes were eliminated.

(E) Between 1977 and 1989, the amount of federal taxes paid by the richest one percent of American increased by $45 billion, while the amount paid by all Americans rose by $50 billion.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 771
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: Kaplan CR Question Doubt [#permalink] New post 21 Aug 2003, 01:11
tina wrote:
Between 1977 and 1989, the percentage of income paid to federal taxes by the richest one percent of Americans decreased from 40 percent to 25 percent. By the end of that same period, however, the richest one percent of Americans were paying a larger proportion of all federal tax revenues from 12.7 percent in 1977 to 16.2 percent in 1989.

Which of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of the discrepancy described above ?

(A) Between 1977 and 1989, the IRS increased the percentage of its staff members responsible for audits and tax collection.

(B) Between 1977 and 1989, the before-tax income of the richest one percent of Americans increased by over 75 percent when adjusted for inflation.

(C) Between 1977 and 1989, many of the richest one percent of Americans shifted their investments from taxable to untaxable.

(D) Between 1977 and 1989, the tax rate paid by middle-income Americans was reduced, but several tax loopholes were eliminated.

(E) Between 1977 and 1989, the amount of federal taxes paid by the richest one percent of American increased by $45 billion, while the amount paid by all Americans rose by $50 billion.

The answer is B.

I would like to know why it is not C ?

Thank You.


You are trying to explain how the proportion of taxes paid by the top 1% earners actually went up despite a rate decrease.

B correctly explains that the top 1% earners could have been earning a lot more, hence every though their tax rate was lower, their overall tax was higher.

C, OTOH, describes why the top 1% should be paying EVEN LESS (by moving money into taxfree earnings, their tax burden is reduce even further) hence it does nothing to explain why the proportion of taxes paid increased.
_________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah
Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep
Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT
MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005
MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Feb 2003
Posts: 147
Location: Kiev
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 21 Aug 2003, 01:50
AkamaiBrah

Could you explain what "OTOH" means, pls
_________________

Too much is not enough...

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 May 2003
Posts: 334
Location: Uruguay
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [1] , given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 21 Aug 2003, 05:47
1
This post received
KUDOS
My guess is: On The Other Hand :wink:
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Feb 2003
Posts: 147
Location: Kiev
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 21 Aug 2003, 06:23
Thanks! :-D
_________________

Too much is not enough...

GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 771
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 21 Aug 2003, 20:01
bono wrote:
Thanks! :-D
\


I use these a lot:

OTOH: on the other hand
IMO: in my opinion
IMHO: in my humble opinion
YMMV: your mileage may vary
GIGO: garbage in, garbage out
RTFM: read the * manual
_________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah
Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep
Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT
MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005
MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Oct 2003
Posts: 73
Location: USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Kaplan CR Question Doubt [#permalink] New post 27 Oct 2003, 20:52
B is not correct. What if the income of the rest 99% increase 10000000%.
I like E.
For reasoning:
The formular is Rate77*Income77; Rate89*income89.
proportion: Rate77*Income77/total tax77 = P77
rate89*income89/total tax89 = p89

Arguement: Rate77>rate89 BUT p77<p89 --> WHY?
Answer:
1. Income89 much larger than income77 AND there is not much change in total tax or the rest 99% DOESN'Tcontribute much more!
2. Income89*rate89 < income77*rate77 AND total tax (or the tax of the rest 99%) reduces even much much more.
So the answer here much has something to do with BOTH sides (the richest and the rest 99%)
That is why B cannot be correct
The only one sound correct is E. richest increase tax 45 m while the rest increase only 5 (50-45)



tina wrote:
Between 1977 and 1989, the percentage of income paid to federal taxes by the richest one percent of Americans decreased from 40 percent to 25 percent. By the end of that same period, however, the richest one percent of Americans were paying a larger proportion of all federal tax revenues from 12.7 percent in 1977 to 16.2 percent in 1989.

Which of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of the discrepancy described above ?

(A) Between 1977 and 1989, the IRS increased the percentage of its staff members responsible for audits and tax collection.

(B) Between 1977 and 1989, the before-tax income of the richest one percent of Americans increased by over 75 percent when adjusted for inflation.

(C) Between 1977 and 1989, many of the richest one percent of Americans shifted their investments from taxable to untaxable.

(D) Between 1977 and 1989, the tax rate paid by middle-income Americans was reduced, but several tax loopholes were eliminated.

(E) Between 1977 and 1989, the amount of federal taxes paid by the richest one percent of American increased by $45 billion, while the amount paid by all Americans rose by $50 billion.

The answer is B.

I would like to know why it is not C ?

Thank You.

_________________

I have 2 month for gmat.

GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 771
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Oct 2003, 02:50
You are correct that you can solve for numbers in E that will be consistent. However, this does not do much to explain the discrepancy of why a smaller tax rate for the rich contributes more to the overall tax burden.

Choice B states that the "rich people" pie is much bigger. Hence, it shows that by taking a smaller piece out of a much larger pie, the overall tax burden borne by the rich can still increase as a percentage of all tax payers. Hence, B does a better job of explaining the discrepancy and is IMO the better answer.
_________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah
Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep
Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT
MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005
MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 865
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
CR - the richest one percent of Americans [#permalink] New post 09 Feb 2005, 22:33
Between 1977 and 1989, the percentage of income paid to federal taxes by the richest one percent of Americans decreased from 40 percent to 25 percent. By the end of that same period, however, the richest one percent of Americans were paying a larger proportion of all federal tax revenues from 12.7 percent in 1977 to 16.2 percent in 1989.

Which of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of the discrepancy described above ?

(A) Between 1977 and 1989, the IRS increased the percentage of its staff members responsible for audits and tax collection.

(B) Between 1977 and 1989, the before-tax income of the richest one percent of Americans increased by over 75 percent when adjusted for inflation.

(C) Between 1977 and 1989, many of the richest one percent of Americans shifted their investments from untaxable to taxable assets.

(D) Between 1977 and 1989, the tax rate paid by middle-income Americans was reduced, but several tax loopholes were eliminated.

(E) Between 1977 and 1989, the amount of federal taxes paid by the richest one percent of American increased by $45 billion, while the amount paid by all Americans rose by $50 billion.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2255
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 195 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 09 Feb 2005, 22:43
Definitely B. The rich has become richer.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 1498
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 09 Feb 2005, 22:45
lower income => higher tax
Higher income => lower tax.

B points this contradiction.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2004
Posts: 905
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2005, 17:40
Betweeb (B) and (C).. I will go for (B).

All other choices are out of scope.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 865
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2005, 18:49
Please explain why (C) is wrong.
OA is (B)
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2004
Posts: 905
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2005, 19:32
I think (C) brings in an assumption that rich ppl had untaxable asset.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2255
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 195 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2005, 20:28
The stem says rich people are paying less fractions of their income, but the absolute value represents a larger proportion of total tax. For example, this rich guy used to pay 40% of 10 million, which is 4 million, and now he is paying only 30% of his income, but the value is 6 million. The only explanation is that his income is now 20 million. If C is true, he would be paying a higher fraction of his income as tax.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 865
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2005, 22:34
This does not convince much.

Quote:
If C is true, he would be paying a higher fraction of his income as tax.


(C) Between 1977 and 1989, many of the richest one percent of Americans shifted their investments from untaxable to taxable assets.

Let look at some number here.

1977: 40% of $100
1989: 25% of ($100 + $10000000) (the taxable assets now, before it was not)
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2255
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 195 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2005, 23:01
Your post cannot be true unless the taxable assets are considered income since we are talking about fraction of income. If assets are considered income then B is true, although I don't think assets are the same as income.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 865
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2005, 23:11
income vs assets

Alright! Got it now. Thanks.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Jan 2005
Posts: 168
Location: NJ
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 11 Feb 2005, 05:51
I know I am late. Yet another B.
I think this is a PR question...isn't it?
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 854
Location: Hyderabad
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
CR - Tax - Kaplan online test [#permalink] New post 27 Feb 2005, 01:34
Between 1977 and 1989, the percentage of income paid to federal taxes by the richest one percent of Americans decreased , from 40% to 25%. By the end of that same period, however, the richest 1% of Americans were paying a larger proportion of all federal tax revenues, from 12.7% in 1977 to 16.2% in 1989.
Which of the following, if true, contributes to an explanation of the discrepancy described above?
A) between 1977 and 1989, the Internal Revenue Servuce increased the percentage of its staff members responsible for audits and tax collection
B)Between 1977 and 1989, the before-tax income of the richest 1% of Americans increased by over 75% when adjusted for inflation
C) Between 1977 and 1989, many of the richest one percent of Americans shifted their investements from taxable to untaxable assets
D)Between 1977 and 1980, the tax rate paid by middle-income Americans was reduced, but several tax loopholes were eliminated
E) Between 1977 and 1989, the amount of federal taxes paid by the richest 1% of Americans increased by $45 billion, while the amount paid by all Americans rose by $50 billion
CR - Tax - Kaplan online test   [#permalink] 27 Feb 2005, 01:34
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
10 Experts publish their posts in the topic Between 1977 and 1989, the percentage of income paid to boomtangboy 15 29 Jan 2012, 01:54
4 Between 1977 and 1989, the percentage of income paid to maheshsrini 8 26 Sep 2011, 19:09
The percentage of households with an annual income of more Swagatalakshmi 0 26 Nov 2006, 17:12
The percentage of households with an annual income of more cybera 0 14 Jul 2005, 15:10
The percentage of households with an annual income of more kv244 5 08 Sep 2004, 04:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Between 1977 and 1989, the percentage of income paid to

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 56 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.