Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 19 May 2013, 12:44
Customize  |  Hide

Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Jan 2013
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64 [#permalink] New post 28 Jan 2013, 13:31
00:00

Question Stats:

44% (02:21) correct 55% (01:49) wrong based on 1 sessions
Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64 was projected to increase from 47 million to 61 million, while the number of Americans aged 18 to 24 was projected to decrease from 26 million to 25 million. According to this projection, which of the following is closest to the ratio of the percent increase in the 45-to-64 age group to the percent decrease in the 18-to-24 age group?

A) 5 to 1
B) 6 to 1
C) 8 to 1
D) 10 to 1
E) 14 to 1

This question is from GMAT Focus.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesManhattan GMAT Discount Codes
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 05 Jun 2012
Posts: 133
Location: Philippines
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 660 Q V
GPA: 3.22
WE: Corporate Finance (Consulting)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 5 [1] , given: 16

Re: Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64 [#permalink] New post 29 Jan 2013, 00:48
1
This post received
KUDOS
deoljasms wrote:
Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64 was projected to increase from 47 million to 61 million, while the number of Americans aged 18 to 24 was projected to decrease from 26 million to 25 million. According to this projection, which of the following is closest to the ratio of the percent increase in the 45-to-64 age group to the percent decrease in the 18-to-24 age group?

A) 5 to 1
B) 6 to 1
C) 8 to 1
D) 10 to 1
E) 14 to 1

This question is from GMAT Focus.


My answer is C.

Given:
1990 - 2000 (one year)
Age 45 to 64 = 47 to 61
Age 18 to 24 = 26 to 25

Find: % increase in 45 to 65 / % decrease in 18 to 24

General formula: % increase or % decrease = (new number - old number ) / old number

That being said, we have:

% increase in 45 to 65 = (65 - 45) / 45 = 14 / 47

% decrease in 18 to 25 = (25 - 26) / 26 = - 1 / 26 or 1 / 26 (we can remove the negative sign because we are talking about changes here)

Now we use the two values:

= (14 / 47) / (1 / 26)

= (14 / 47) * ( 26)

= 364 / 47

~ 7.7...

7.7 is closest to 8, which is answer choice (C)

There you have it. :) Kudos please? :)
_________________

Far better is it to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure... than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much, because they live in a gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat.
- T. Roosevelt

Re: Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64   [#permalink] 29 Jan 2013, 00:48
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Between 1900 and 2000, Protestantism in the US will (have RK73 8 21 Jul 2003, 20:39
Popular new posts 6 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC Between 1990 and 2000 the global economy grew more than it gamjatang 28 07 Dec 2005, 08:22
New posts Between 1990 and 2000, the annual precipitation in Henan, skim 4 27 Jun 2009, 10:06
New posts In the 2000 local election, only 28% of individuals between kingb 1 10 Nov 2012, 11:20
Popular new posts 35 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC Between 2000 and 2010, the $10.7 billion ski and egmat 33 13 Jan 2013, 23:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.