Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 19 Apr 2014, 12:21

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Beverage company representative: The plastic rings that hold

Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Posts: 263
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 9

Beverage company representative: The plastic rings that hold [#permalink]  19 Jul 2011, 22:44
Beverage company representative: The plastic rings that hold six-packs of beverage cans together pose a threat to wild animals, which often become entangled in the discarded rings and suffocate as a result. Following our lead, all beverage companies will soon use only those rings consisting of a new plastic that disintegrates after only three days’ exposure to sunlight. Once we all complete the switchover from the old to the new plastic rings, therefore, the threat of suffocation that plastic rings pose to wild animals will be eliminated.

The argument depends on which one of the following assumptions?

(A) None of the new plastic rings can disintegrate after only two days’ exposure to sunlight.
(B) The switchover to the new plastic rings can be completed without causing significant financial hardship to the beverage companies.
(C) Wild animals will not become entangled in the new plastic rings before the rings have had sufficient exposure to sunlight to disintegrate.
(D) Use of the old plastic rings poses no substantial threat to wild animals other than that of suffocation.
(E) Any wild animal that becomes entangled in the old plastic rings will suffocate as a result.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 01 Oct 2009
Posts: 485
Location: Bangalore,India
WE 1: 4yrs in IT Industry
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 311

Re: CR - Beverage Company Assumption Question [#permalink]  20 Jul 2011, 00:47
_________________

One Final Try.......

Manager
Joined: 24 Aug 2008
Posts: 233
Location: India
WE 1: 3.75 IT
WE 2: 1.0 IT
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 5

Re: CR - Beverage Company Assumption Question [#permalink]  20 Jul 2011, 01:10
DeeptiM wrote:
Beverage company representative: The plastic rings that hold six-packs of beverage cans together pose a threat to wild animals, which often become entangled in the discarded rings and suffocate as a result. Following our lead, all beverage companies will soon use only those rings consisting of a new plastic that disintegrates after only three days’ exposure to sunlight. Once we all complete the switchover from the old to the new plastic rings, therefore, the threat of suffocation that plastic rings pose to wild animals will be eliminated.

The argument depends on which one of the following assumptions?

Argument: The threat of suffocation that plastic rings pose to wild animals will be eliminated.

(A) None of the new plastic rings can disintegrate after only two days’ exposure to sunlight.
It is already given in the stimulus that the new plastic ring disintegrates after only three days’ exposure to sunlight.

(B) The switchover to the new plastic rings can be completed without causing significant financial hardship to the beverage companies.
Nothing related to Finances is mentioned in the argument.

(C) Wild animals will not become entangled in the new plastic rings before the rings have had sufficient exposure to sunlight to disintegrate.
This is the correct answer. The assumption is that animals won't die because of suffocation by new plastic rings before the period of 3 days sunlight exposure before which rings won't disintegrate.

(D) Use of the old plastic rings poses no substantial threat to wild animals other than that of suffocation.
The argument is about death of animals due to suffocation.

(E) Any wild animal that becomes entangled in the old plastic rings will suffocate as a result.
The argument states about complete switchover from the old to the new plastic rings.

_________________

Cheers,
Varun

If you like my post, give me KUDOS!!

Director
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 708
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 92 [0], given: 37

Re: CR - Beverage Company Assumption Question [#permalink]  20 Jul 2011, 02:03
C for me as well.

Crick
Manager
Joined: 25 Sep 2010
Posts: 85
Schools: HBS, LBS, Wharton, Kelloggs, Booth
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 15

Re: Beverage company representative: The plastic rings that hold [#permalink]  29 Jan 2012, 05:41
+1 C
Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Apr 2011
Posts: 289
Schools: Booth,NUS,St.Gallon
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 50

Re: Beverage company representative: The plastic rings that hold [#permalink]  31 Jan 2012, 08:11
+1 for C
_________________

+1 if you like my explanation .Thanks

Senior Manager
Status: May The Force Be With Me (D-DAY 15 May 2012)
Joined: 06 Jan 2012
Posts: 294
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 16

Re: Beverage company representative: The plastic rings that hold [#permalink]  03 Feb 2012, 02:41
+1 C
_________________

Giving +1 kudos is a better way of saying 'Thank You'.

Manager
Status: Seeking new horizons...
Joined: 03 Sep 2010
Posts: 65
Location: Taiwan, Province of China
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 29

Re: Beverage company representative: The plastic rings that hold [#permalink]  03 Feb 2012, 03:09
DeeptiM wrote:
Beverage company representative: The plastic rings that hold six-packs of beverage cans together pose a threat to wild animals, which often become entangled in the discarded rings and suffocate as a result. Following our lead, all beverage companies will soon use only those rings consisting of a new plastic that disintegrates after only three days’ exposure to sunlight. Once we all complete the switchover from the old to the new plastic rings, therefore, the threat of suffocation that plastic rings pose to wild animals will be eliminated.

The argument depends on which one of the following assumptions?

(A) None of the new plastic rings can disintegrate after only two days’ exposure to sunlight.
(B) The switchover to the new plastic rings can be completed without causing significant financial hardship to the beverage companies.
(C) Wild animals will not become entangled in the new plastic rings before the rings have had sufficient exposure to sunlight to disintegrate.
(D) Use of the old plastic rings poses no substantial threat to wild animals other than that of suffocation.
(E) Any wild animal that becomes entangled in the old plastic rings will suffocate as a result.

Premise 1: Wild Animals get entangled in the plastic rings and suffocate, causing a threat to their lives.
Premise 2: Companies will switch to new plastic rings that will disintegrate after only three days’ exposure to sunlight.
Conclusion: Once the companies switchover to new plastic rings completely, the threat of suffocation that plastic rings pose to wild animals will be eliminated.

Now, Premise1 + Premise2 + Assumption (Answer choice) = Conclusion.
For conclusion to be valid, the correct answer choice must address the following question: what will happen to the animals between the three days before the plastic rings disintegrate? Can the new plastic rings cause threat to wild animals before it disintegrates?

(A) Does not address how the new plastic rings will completely eliminate the threat to wild animals.
(B) Financial hardship to the companies is out of the scope of the argument.
(C) Correctly connects the premises with the conclusion.
(D) Neither addresses the conclusion nor related to the premises. Uses extreme language: old plastic rings poses no substantial threat
(E) Same reason as (D) and Extreme language: Any wild animal that becomes entangled

Thus, the correct answer is C.
_________________

Learn to walk before you run.

Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Nov 2010
Posts: 270
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT 1: 520 Q42 V19
GMAT 2: 540 Q44 V21
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 22

Re: Beverage company representative: The plastic rings that hold [#permalink]  03 Mar 2012, 18:11
C -- wild animal will not entangle within 3days(before disintegration)
_________________

The proof of understanding is the ability to explain it.

Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2010
Posts: 183
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 20

Re: Beverage company representative: The plastic rings that hold [#permalink]  04 Mar 2012, 12:16
Answer is clear C. Assumed that the animals do not fall victim to the new plastic rings within 3 days of their disposal.
Re: Beverage company representative: The plastic rings that hold   [#permalink] 04 Mar 2012, 12:16
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Beverage company representative: The plastic rings that hold 9 06 Oct 2006, 20:07
Beverage company representative: The plastic rings that hold 7 02 Oct 2008, 07:05
3 Beverage company representative: The plastic rings that hold 17 11 Sep 2010, 03:00
Beverage company representative: The plastic rings that hold 4 26 Apr 2011, 21:53
2 Beverage company representative: The plastic rings that hold 4 07 Dec 2012, 22:16
Display posts from previous: Sort by