|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Posts: 42
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 [#permalink]
21 Jan 2007, 17:16
Question Stats:
78% (03:26) correct
21% (01:52) wrong based on 3 sessions
Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6 cards each. Each of the 6 cards within a suit has a different value from 1 to 6; thus, there are 2 cards in the deck that have the same value. Bill likes to play a game in which he shuffles the deck, turns over 4 cards, and looks for pairs of cards that have the same value. What is the chance that Bill finds at least one pair of cards that have the same value? A. 8/33 B. 62/165 C. 17/33 D. 103/165 E. 25/33 OPEN DISCUSSION OF THIS QUESTION IS HERE: bill-has-a-small-deck-of-12-playing-cards-made-up-of-only-2-suits-of-6-cards-each-96078.html
_________________
Beginning with the end in mind. Aiming to join the 700+ club.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Jun 2006
Posts: 398
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
293
[2] , given: 0
|
2
This post received KUDOS
answer is C (17/33) in my opinion.
here is how i did it....
total number of 4 cards drawings: 12*11*10*9
drawings which have no pairs at all: 12*10*8*6
probability to have no pairs: 12*10*8*6/12*11*10*9 = 16/33
probability to have at least one pair: 1-16/33 = 17/33
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 29 Oct 2006
Posts: 34
Location: India
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Hey Hobbit! Could you please explain how you got that figure "Drawings which have no pairs at all"??
I didn't follow that step.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Jun 2006
Posts: 398
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
293
[0], given: 0
|
counting quadruples with no pairs:
first card - no restrictions - 12 options
second card - cannot be same as first - 10 options (out of 11 cards)
third card - cannot be same as first or second - 8 options (out of 10 cards left)
forut card - cannot be same as first three - hence 6 options out of 9 remaining cards).
total 12*10*8*6/12*11*10*9 = 16/33
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 29 Oct 2006
Posts: 34
Location: India
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Thanks a lot pal!
Probability sure is one of my weak-points......
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Posts: 42
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Hobbit is right. OA is C.
This problem is from MGMAT. IMO, it's a little too hard to be on the real test but it's good practice nonetheless.
_________________
Beginning with the end in mind. Aiming to join the 700+ club.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Posts: 524
Location: Indonesia
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
65
[0], given: 0
|
Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6 cards each. Each of the 6 cards within a suit has a different value from 1 to 6; thus, there are 2 cards in the deck that have the same value.
Bill likes to play a game in which he shuffles the deck, turns over 4 cards, and looks for pairs of cards that have the same value. What is the chance that Bill finds at least one pair of cards that have the same value?
A 8/33
B 62/165
C 17/33
D103/165
E 25/33
Amar
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3596
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Followers: 232
Kudos [?]:
1301
[0], given: 346
|
C.
p=1-q, where q is the probability to turn over 4 cards with different values.
12P4 - the total number of combinations.
12*(11-1)*(10-2)*(9-3)=12*10*8*6 - the number of combinations with 4 cards with different values.
p=1-12*10*8*6/12P4=1-12*10*8*6*8!/12!=1-12*10*8*6/(12*11*10*9)=1-8*6/(11*9)=1-16/33=17/33
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 13 Jun 2007
Posts: 51
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6 cards each. Each of the 6 cards within a suit has a different value from 1 to 6; thus, there are 2 cards in the deck that have the same value.
Bill likes to play a game in which he shuffles the deck, turns over 4 cards, and looks for pairs of cards that have the same value. What is the chance that Bill finds at least one pair of cards that have the same value?
A 8/33
B 62/165
C 17/33
D 103/165
E 25/33
I know the answer is C but i can't understand why i can't get the answer in the following way....
12C4 gives all the combinations = 11*9*5
6*10C2 gives all the possible combinations with at least one pair=6*9*5
divide giving 6/11 ?????
I don't see what i am doing wrong
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2618
Followers: 13
Kudos [?]:
142
[0], given: 0
|
alexperi wrote: Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6 cards each. Each of the 6 cards within a suit has a different value from 1 to 6; thus, there are 2 cards in the deck that have the same value.
Bill likes to play a game in which he shuffles the deck, turns over 4 cards, and looks for pairs of cards that have the same value. What is the chance that Bill finds at least one pair of cards that have the same value?
A 8/33 B 62/165 C 17/33 D 103/165 E 25/33
I know the answer is C but i can't understand why i can't get the answer in the following way.... 12C4 gives all the combinations = 11*9*5 6*10C2 gives all the possible combinations with at least one pair=6*9*5 divide giving 6/11 ????? I don't see what i am doing wrong
I dunno, bout that approach, im really bad using the combinatorics approach.
Well try and find the probabilty that there are no pairs.
Lets say we pick the following cards: 1,2,3,4. In this order.
1 * 10/11 * 8/10 * 6/9
1: b/c the probability of picking any number is 1.
10/11: is the prob of not picking the next pair
we have 1,2
8/10: we have 1,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6 left. 10 numbers and 2 unfavorables here. So its 8/10
6/9: we have 1,2,3,4,4,5,5,6,6 left. So 9 numbers and 3 unfavorables so 6/9.
We have 16/33 --> 1-16/33 = 17/33.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 13 Jun 2007
Posts: 51
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
Thanks GMATBLACKBELT but i know and understand your approach. I am just trying to standardise my thinking. If combinatorics approach doesn't apply here then i will be confused when to use and when not to use combinatorics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 11 Aug 2007
Posts: 67
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 0
|
had the same problem with this question: tried to use combinatorics, but failed
can someone explain how to attack this question with comb.tools?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3596
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Followers: 232
Kudos [?]:
1301
[0], given: 346
|
elgo wrote: had the same problem with this question: tried to use combinatorics, but failed can someone explain how to attack this question with comb.tools?
see this one: http://www.gmatclub.com/forum/t56530
I guess If we have a problem with complex restrictions, nCm, nPm formulas will be too unwieldy and a more-2-minutes method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 13 Jun 2007
Posts: 51
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
Still do not see what i am missing out or including with the method i used.
"12C4 gives all the combinations = 11*9*5
6*10C2 gives all the possible combinations with at least one pair=6*9*5
divide giving 6/11"
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3596
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Followers: 232
Kudos [?]:
1301
[0], given: 346
|
alexperi wrote: "12C4 gives all the combinations = 11*9*5 You should use 12P4 instead of 12C4. 1234 and 4321 are different cases. alexperi wrote: 6*10C2" Sorry, I don't understand logic of this formula.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 13 Jun 2007
Posts: 51
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
Hmmmmm i think you have struck a cord
6*10C2
There are Six sets if (10C2).
Assume i have selected the first pair then i have i have 10 cards to choose 2 from. And there are 6 such scenarios because there are 6 pairs of cards.
BUT you have just reminded me that this way includes some duplicates so my method nearly correct.
so
[10C2+(10C2-1)+(10C2-2)+(10C2-3)+(10C2-4)+(10C2-5) ]/12C4=17/33
Now i can rest my mind
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 11 Aug 2007
Posts: 67
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 0
|
walker wrote: elgo wrote: had the same problem with this question: tried to use combinatorics, but failed can someone explain how to attack this question with comb.tools? see this one: http://www.gmatclub.com/forum/t56530I guess If we have a problem with complex restrictions, nCm, nPm formulas will be too unwieldy and a more-2-minutes method.
Thanks a ton!
Anyway, I guess I'd better use probability formula in such cases... nCm, nPm are too much thinking:) (I mean in this particular task)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Posts: 105
Location: Astana
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 0
|
walker wrote: p=1-q, where q is the probability to turn over 4 cards with different values.
Same starting point. But aftwerwards applied the following logic
probability that the second card will not make a pair to the first withdrwan
times
probability that the third will not make a pair with any of the two previously witdrawn cards
times
probability that the fourth one will not make a pair with any of the three previously withdrawn cards
(12-1-1)/11 * (12-2-2)/10 * (12-3-3)/9 = 16/33
1 - 16/33 = 17/33
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2618
Followers: 13
Kudos [?]:
142
[0], given: 0
|
Amardeep Sharma wrote: Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6 cards each. Each of the 6 cards within a suit has a different value from 1 to 6; thus, there are 2 cards in the deck that have the same value.
Bill likes to play a game in which he shuffles the deck, turns over 4 cards, and looks for pairs of cards that have the same value. What is the chance that Bill finds at least one pair of cards that have the same value?
A 8/33 B 62/165 C 17/33 D103/165 E 25/33
Amar
OK here it is, I originally got the answer, but did it through some method that doesn't really make a whole lot of sense to me anymore. I dont think it was correct either, I just got really lucky and somehow things worked out =)
Probability of NOT picking any pairs.
1*10/11* 8/10*6/9
1/11*8*2/3 --> 16/33 --> 1-16/33 =17/33
Ok there we go.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1108
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
80
[0], given: 0
|
GMATBLACKBELT wrote: Amardeep Sharma wrote: Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6 cards each. Each of the 6 cards within a suit has a different value from 1 to 6; thus, there are 2 cards in the deck that have the same value.
Bill likes to play a game in which he shuffles the deck, turns over 4 cards, and looks for pairs of cards that have the same value. What is the chance that Bill finds at least one pair of cards that have the same value?
A 8/33 B 62/165 C 17/33 D103/165 E 25/33
Amar OK here it is, I originally got the answer, but did it through some method that doesn't really make a whole lot of sense to me anymore. I dont think it was correct either, I just got really lucky and somehow things worked out =) Probability of NOT picking any pairs. 1*10/11* 8/10*6/9 1/11*8*2/3 --> 16/33 --> 1-16/33 =17/33 Ok there we go. can someone tell me where I am wrong???? all possible outcomes: 12c4=990 let's choose 1 pair of identic cards from the 2 sets: 6c1 possibilities=6 let's multiply this result * 10c2, combinations for the 2 free places=6*45=270 let's consider the possibility that we have 2 pairs of identic cards: 6c2=15 thus we have 285/990 = 19/33....please help! I add 15 but I am sure it needs to subtract it from 270.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|