Biologists have advanced two theories to explain : GMAT Reading Comprehension (RC)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 08 Dec 2016, 11:06
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Biologists have advanced two theories to explain

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

9 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 53
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 762 [9] , given: 0

Biologists have advanced two theories to explain [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Aug 2012, 16:07
9
This post received
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

83% (02:00) correct 17% (01:54) wrong based on 181

HideShow timer Statistics




Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

88% (01:25) correct 12% (00:24) wrong based on 168

HideShow timer Statistics




Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

93% (01:22) correct 7% (00:20) wrong based on 168

HideShow timer Statistics




Question 4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

87% (01:41) correct 13% (00:54) wrong based on 169

HideShow timer Statistics




Biologists have advanced two theories to explain why schooling of fish occurs in so many fish species. Because schooling is particularly widespread among species of small fish, both theories assume that schooling offers the advantage of some protection from predators.
Proponents of theory A dispute the assumption that a school of thousands of fish is highly visible. Experiments have shown that any fish can be seen, even in very clear water, only within a sphere of 200 meters in diameter. When fish are in a compact group, the spheres of visibility overlap. Thus the chance of a predator finding the school is only slightly greater than the chance of the predator finding a single fish swimming alone. Schooling is advantageous to the individual fish because a predator's chance of finding any particular fish swimming in the school is much smaller than its chance of finding at least one of the same group of fish if the fish were dispersed throughout an area.

However, critics of theory A point out that some fish form schools even in areas where predators are abundant and thus little possibility of escaping detection exists. They argue that the school continues to be of value to its members even after detection. They advocate theory B, the "confusion effect," which can be explained in two different ways. Sometimes, proponents argue, predators simply cannot decide which fish to attack. This indecision supposedly results from a predator's preference for striking prey that is distinct from the rest of the school in appearance. In many schools the fish are almost identical in appearance, making it difficult for a predator to select one. The second explanation for the "confusion effect" has to do with the sensory confusion caused by a large number of prey moving around the predator. Even if the predator makes the decision to attack a particular fish, the movement of other prey in the school can be distracting. The predator's difficulty can be compared to that of a tennis player trying to hit a tennis ball when two are approaching
simultaneously.
1. According to the passage, theory B states that which of the following is a factor that enables a schooling fish to escape predators?
(A) The tendency of fish to form compact groups
(B) The movement of other fish within the school
(C) The inability of predators to detect schools
(D) The ability of fish to hide behind one another in a school
(E) The great speed with which a school can disperse
[Reveal] Spoiler:
B


2. According to the passage, both theory A and theory B have been developed to explain how
(A) fish hide from predators by forming schools
(B) forming schools functions to protect fish from predators ·
(C) schooling among fish differs from other protective behaviors
(D) small fish are able to make rapid decisions
(E) small fish are able to survive in an environment densely populated by large predators
[Reveal] Spoiler:
B


3. According to one explanation of the "confusion effect," a fish that swims in a school will have greater advantages for survival if it
(A) tends to be visible for no more than 200 meters
(B) stays near either the front or the rear of a school
(C) is part of a small school rather than a large school
(D) is very similar in appearance to the other fish in the school
(E) is medium-sized
[Reveal] Spoiler:
D


4. The author is primarily concerned with
(A) discussing different theories
(B) analyzing different techniques
(C) defending two hypotheses
(D) refuting established beliefs
(E) revealing new evidence
[Reveal] Spoiler:
A

[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #1 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #2 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #3 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #4 OA
Request Expert Reply
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
4 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Status: Now or never
Joined: 07 Aug 2010
Posts: 328
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GPA: 3.5
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 234 [4] , given: 27

Premium Member
Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Aug 2012, 04:37
4
This post received
KUDOS
My take BBDA , cant believe got all correct :)
_________________

Please press KUDOS if you like my post

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 217
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 195 [0], given: 54

CAT Tests
Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Aug 2012, 04:57
same this was easier one

B Even if the predator
makes the decision to attack a particular fish,
the movement of other prey in the school can
(40) be distracting.

B both theories assume that
(5) schooling offers the advantage of some protection
from predators.

D This indecision
(30) supposedly results from a predator's preference for
striking prey that is distinct from the rest of the
school in appearance.


A 2nd proponents of A 3rd critics of a 1st two theories a and b
_________________

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, I kinda need some =)

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2010
Posts: 368
Schools: IE'14, ISB'14, Kellogg'15
WE 1: 7 Yrs in Automobile (Commercial Vehicle industry)
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 366 [0], given: 50

Reviews Badge
Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Aug 2012, 13:01
In 5:30 Mins, I got BBDA (All correct). Question were very straight.
_________________

Regards
SD
-----------------------------
Press Kudos if you like my post.
Debrief 610-540-580-710(Long Journey): http://gmatclub.com/forum/from-600-540-580-710-finally-achieved-in-4th-attempt-142456.html

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2012
Posts: 130
Schools: IIMA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 66

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jul 2014, 04:38
Easy one all correct in 5 min :) very straight answers
_________________

If you are not over prepared then you are under prepared !!!

1 KUDOS received
NUS Thread Master
User avatar
Affiliations: Oracle certified java programmer , adobe certified developer
Joined: 14 Jul 2013
Posts: 141
GMAT Date: 02-12-2015
GPA: 3.87
WE: Programming (Telecommunications)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 13 [1] , given: 37

Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Oct 2014, 20:20
1
This post received
KUDOS
1.B
2.B
3.D
4.A
time:8 minutes
_________________

IF IT IS TO BE , IT IS UP TO ME

4 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 21 Apr 2014
Posts: 40
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 18 [4] , given: 0

Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jan 2015, 21:34
4
This post received
KUDOS
First of all, how I would map this out and take notes while reading would be something like this:

2 theories why schooling occurs--both assume protection from predators
Theory A--predator's chance of finding a fish in school<finding one if dispersed
Theory B--"Confusion effect"- 2 explanations
---1) pred cannot decide
---2) sensory confusion

Notes like these will help you keep track of where everything is and help you find specific information when you need it to answer a question.

Question 1 asks about theory B, so we know its in paragraph 3.
A) is incorrect, because theory B says their are values beyond the group
B) seems promising, as sensory confusion from the movement is an explanation for the confusion effect
C) it incorrect, nowhere does it say that predators cannot detect entire schools
D) There is also nothing about hiding in theory B
E) also out of scope, because the passage says nothing about the groups dispersing
Thus, B is the answer

Question 2 asks about both theory A and B, so it it likely more dispersed throughout the passage or in paragraph one, which discusses both. This question also asks for something that is true for BOTH theories, so if it is not true for one, we can eliminate the whole answer
A) is wrong, because they are not hiding from predators, especially not in theory B.
B) this is promising, both theories do explain how forming schools protects from predators
C) there is no mention of other protective behaviors, so eliminate
D) nothing about small fish specifically, so eliminate
E) again, there is nothing about small and large, so eliminate
Thus, B is our answer

Question 3 asks about the confusion effect, so we know to look in paragraph 3
A) out of scope there is no mention of a specific number of meters
B) although this might be a logical leap in the real world, there is no mention of the fish's position in the school, so eliminate it
C)there is no mention of the size of the school, so eliminate
D) The fourth and fifth sentence in the 3rd paragraph explain why this is true
E) no mention of size, so eliminate
D is our answer

Question 4 is a general question, so there is no specific part to go back to
A) seems to be right, the author does discuss different theories
B) they are not techniques
C) defending is too strong a word
D) he does not refute anything
E) no new evidence is revealed
Thus, the answer is A
_________________

Eliza
GMAT Tutor
bestgmatprepcourse.com

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Waiting
Joined: 22 Jan 2015
Posts: 51
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Strategy
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
GMAT 2: 650 Q47 V33
GPA: 3.37
WE: Engineering (Health Care)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 40

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 May 2015, 03:39
Easy passage:
1)B
2)B
3)D
4)A
Time: 6:16
_________________

May the odds be ever in your favor.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Aug 2014
Posts: 18
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 8

Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Dec 2015, 11:59
Hello ,

Yes the answers are straight forward but can some one help me in understanding the flow for theory A in the passage.

Proponents of theory A dispute the assumption that a school of thousands of fish is highly visible. Experiments have shown that any fish can be seen, even in very clear water, only within a sphere of 200 meters in diameter. When fish are in a compact group, the spheres of visibility overlap. Thus the chance of a predator finding the school is only slightly greater than the chance of the predator finding a single fish swimming alone.

People in favor of theory A first dispute that School is highly visible and then they conclude that chance predator finding the school is slightly greater than finding individual fish.
To me the two statements seems to oppose rather than support .

Where am I going wrong ?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2016
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 4

Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Feb 2016, 07:49
BBDA
Got all right in less than 5 mins. The was an easy one. :-D
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 24
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 17 [1] , given: 10

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jun 2016, 19:29
1
This post received
KUDOS
Main idea:

Author is trying to provide two theories why schooling occurs among fishes. author gave two theories, which are about protection from predetors.

Tone: author is not biased and just gave two theories.

A)Theory B stats that how movement of different fish can save them.
B)This can be answered from main idea
C)Predators only go after distinct prey. fish take advantage of this revolve around to confuse them.
D)Go with the tone of the passage.
_________________

Thanks!
Do give some kudos.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 63
Concentration: Marketing, Economics
GMAT 1: 610 Q47 V27
GRE 1: 304 Q156 V148
GPA: 3.66
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 47

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Nov 2016, 04:12
I think the difficulty level of this RC should be below 600.
_________________

Getting kudos is encouraging.
Giving kudos is a way of saying thanks
. :-D

Hasan Mahmud

Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain   [#permalink] 02 Nov 2016, 04:12
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
9 Experts publish their posts in the topic Recently biologists have been interested in a uledssul 18 26 Jul 2012, 20:38
1 Since World War II considerable advances have been made in rohitgoel15 8 23 Jul 2010, 05:55
1 The two main theories of arbitration may be mbaMission 5 13 Jun 2009, 05:10
3 According to a theory advanced by researcher Paul Martin priyankur_saha@ml.com 14 10 Apr 2009, 02:11
15 Experts publish their posts in the topic Two modes of argumentation have been used on behalf of serf87 13 05 Nov 2007, 02:27
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Biologists have advanced two theories to explain

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.