Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 13 Jul 2014, 07:12

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Biologists have noted reproductive abnormalities in fish

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 196
Schools: ABCD
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 78

GMAT Tests User
Biologists have noted reproductive abnormalities in fish [#permalink] New post 27 Oct 2011, 04:17
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

22% (01:58) correct 77% (01:25) wrong based on 45 sessions
Biologists have noted reproductive abnormalities in fish
that are immediately downstream of paper mills. One
possible cause is dioxin, which paper mills release
daily and which can alter the concentration of
hormones in fish. However, dioxin is unlikely to be the
cause, since the fish recover normal hormone
concentrations relatively quickly during occasional mill
shutdowns and dioxin decomposes very slowly in the
environment.
Which one of the following statements, if true, most
seriously weakens the argument?
(A) Some of the studies that show that fish recover
quickly during shutdowns were funded by
paper manufacturers.
(B) The rate at which dioxin decomposes varies
depending on the conditions to which it is
exposed.
(C) Normal river currents carry the dioxin present in
the river far downstream in a few hours.
(D) Some of the fish did not recover rapidly from
the physiological changes that were induced by
the changes in hormone concentrations.
(E) The connection between hormone concentrations
and reproductive abnormalities is not
thoroughly understood.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Oct 2011
Posts: 17
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V50
GPA: 3.93
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: <Tough CR :( > [#permalink] New post 27 Oct 2011, 21:24
voodoochild wrote:
Biologists have noted reproductive abnormalities in fish
that are immediately downstream of paper mills. One
possible cause is dioxin, which paper mills release
daily and which can alter the concentration of
hormones in fish. However, dioxin is unlikely to be the
cause, since the fish recover normal hormone
concentrations relatively quickly during occasional mill
shutdowns and dioxin decomposes very slowly in the
environment.
Which one of the following statements, if true, most
seriously weakens the argument?
(A) Some of the studies that show that fish recover
quickly during shutdowns were funded by
paper manufacturers.
(B) The rate at which dioxin decomposes varies
depending on the conditions to which it is
exposed.
(C) Normal river currents carry the dioxin present in
the river far downstream in a few hours.
(D) Some of the fish did not recover rapidly from
the physiological changes that were induced by
the changes in hormone concentrations.
(E) The connection between hormone concentrations
and reproductive abnormalities is not
thoroughly understood.

OA - C Please explain why. This one completely blew me off.



The argument given against dioxin is as follows:

Fact - Dioxin decomposes very slowly in the environment
Fact - Fish recover normal hormone concentrations quickly during mill shutdowns (presumably while dioxin is not being released into the environment)
Conclusion - Dioxin is unlikely to be the cause (of hormone imbalance in fish)

However, if normal river currents carry the dioxin present in the river far downstream in a few hours, then it doesn't matter that that dioxin decomposes slowly - it has all been carried away downstream, which means that the fish are now in dioxin-free conditions. Therefore, the fact that the fish recover quickly can't be used to rule out dioxin as the original cause of altered hormone concentrations.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: livin on a prayer!!
Joined: 12 May 2011
Posts: 125
Location: Australia
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 1

Re: <Tough CR :( > [#permalink] New post 29 Oct 2011, 18:04
Argument: Dioxin decomps slowly, fish recover normal [hormones] quickly

The answer is C. If the river carries the dioxin far downstream in a few hours, then it doesn't matter if dioxin decomps slowly, there won't be any dioxin in the water anyway. So you can't rule out dioxin as an unlikely cause as a result of the fish altered concentrations.
_________________

Aim for the sky! (800 in this case)
If you like my post, please give me Kudos :)

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 May 2011
Posts: 379
Location: US
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 60 [0], given: 46

Re: <Tough CR :( > [#permalink] New post 29 Oct 2011, 19:25
Mindreko wrote:
Argument: Dioxin decomps slowly, fish recover normal [hormones] quickly

The answer is C. If the river carries the dioxin far downstream in a few hours, then it doesn't matter if dioxin decomps slowly, there won't be any dioxin in the water anyway. So you can't rule out dioxin as an unlikely cause as a result of the fish altered concentrations.



I didnt get that...If river carries the dioxin far downstream in a few hours..than there won't be any dioxin in the water anyway. This explanation support the claim that dioxin is unlikely to be the cause.
How does this weakens the argument?

Cheers!
_________________

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What you do TODAY is important because you're exchanging a day of your life for it!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: livin on a prayer!!
Joined: 12 May 2011
Posts: 125
Location: Australia
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 1

Re: Biologists have noted reproductive abnormalities in fish [#permalink] New post 29 Oct 2011, 19:52
You can't rule out dioxin as a contributor to the fish recovering quickly if there isn't any dioxin in the water. The question is trying to rule out dioxin as the cause of fish recovering quickly.
_________________

Aim for the sky! (800 in this case)
If you like my post, please give me Kudos :)

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Posts: 165
WE 1: Information Technology(Retail)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 29

Re: Biologists have noted reproductive abnormalities in fish [#permalink] New post 31 Oct 2011, 15:14
IMO-B
C seems to strenghten the conclusion that Dioxin is not the cause.
Can someone please confirm?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: livin on a prayer!!
Joined: 12 May 2011
Posts: 125
Location: Australia
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 1

Re: Biologists have noted reproductive abnormalities in fish [#permalink] New post 31 Oct 2011, 16:06
Babzsn84 wrote:
IMO-B
C seems to strenghten the conclusion that Dioxin is not the cause.
Can someone please confirm?


See my explanation above. Does that make sense?
_________________

Aim for the sky! (800 in this case)
If you like my post, please give me Kudos :)

Director
Director
avatar
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 708
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 92 [0], given: 37

GMAT Tests User
Re: Biologists have noted reproductive abnormalities in fish [#permalink] New post 31 Oct 2011, 23:06
+1 for C.

Crick
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 790
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 32

Kudos [?]: 151 [0], given: 37

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Biologists have noted reproductive abnormalities in fish [#permalink] New post 16 Dec 2011, 01:41
I got D. However, I found problem with D is that D talks about "some of the fish" not all. So, not strong as C. Am I correct? Can anyone elaborate for D?
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you :)

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 186
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V37
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 6

GMAT Tests User
Re: Biologists have noted reproductive abnormalities in fish [#permalink] New post 26 Dec 2011, 11:10
C
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Aug 2011
Posts: 203
GPA: 3.5
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 51

GMAT Tests User
Re: Biologists have noted reproductive abnormalities in fish [#permalink] New post 31 Dec 2011, 21:44
C it is,using POE D which is a close contender can be removed, according to argument most fish recover well from hormonal imbalance but according to D only few fish cannot so overall it does not hamper the argument.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Aug 2010
Posts: 316
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: Biologists have noted reproductive abnormalities in fish [#permalink] New post 03 Jan 2012, 01:55
+1 for C
Re: Biologists have noted reproductive abnormalities in fish   [#permalink] 03 Jan 2012, 01:55
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
10 Biologists have noted reproductive abnormalities in fish vjsharma25 17 14 Mar 2011, 08:18
Biologists believe that they have found one of the rahulraao 8 11 Nov 2005, 06:40
Biologists believe that they have found one of the nakib77 6 21 Oct 2005, 12:48
Biologists believe that they have found one of the Vithal 4 17 May 2005, 19:16
Biologists believe that they have found one of the rthothad 14 19 Nov 2004, 12:57
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Biologists have noted reproductive abnormalities in fish

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.