Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Oct 2014, 16:32

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 709
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 108 [0], given: 0

Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2008, 11:36
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB hepatitis. Although the new screening tests are estimated to disqualify up to 5 percent of all prospective blood donors, they will still miss two-thirds of donors carrying NANB hepatitis. Therefore, about 10 percent of actual donors will still supply NANB-contaminated blood.
The argument above depends on which of the following assumptions?
(A) Donors carrying NANB hepatitis do not, in a large percentage of cases, carry other infections for which reliable screening tests are routinely performed.
(B) Donors carrying NANB hepatitis do not, in a large percentage of cases, develop the disease themselves at any point.
(C) The estimate of the number of donors who would be disqualified by tests for NANB hepatitis is an underestimate.
(D) The incidence of NANB hepatitis is lower among the potential blood donors than it is in the population at large.
(E) The donors who will still supply NANB-contaminated blood will donate blood at the average frequency for all donors.
_________________

Persistence+Patience+Persistence+Patience=G...O...A...L

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1467
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 108 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Blood NANB [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2008, 12:05
prasannar wrote:
Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB hepatitis. Although the new screening tests are estimated to disqualify up to 5 percent of all prospective blood donors, they will still miss two-thirds of donors carrying NANB hepatitis. Therefore, about 10 percent of actual donors will still supply NANB-contaminated blood.
The argument above depends on which of the following assumptions?
(A) Donors carrying NANB hepatitis do not, in a large percentage of cases, carry other infections for which reliable screening tests are routinely performed.
(B) Donors carrying NANB hepatitis do not, in a large percentage of cases, develop the disease themselves at any point.
(C) The estimate of the number of donors who would be disqualified by tests for NANB hepatitis is an underestimate.
(D) The incidence of NANB hepatitis is lower among the potential blood donors than it is in the population at large.
(E) The donors who will still supply NANB-contaminated blood will donate blood at the average frequency for all donors.


Tough one, but I came down to A or E, someone explain.
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3403
Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 164 [0], given: 2

Re: CR: Blood NANB [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2008, 12:17
A for me..

basically says there is no other way for us to detect these hep-b carriers...if for instance A was true the the whole argument falls apart.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 11
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Blood NANB [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2008, 12:37
I will go for E. If the donors will not donate blood at the average frequency then the numbers wont make to 10% of the donors.

Can you please provide the OA
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Posts: 798
Followers: 20

Kudos [?]: 89 [0], given: 25

Re: CR: Blood NANB [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2008, 13:12
E.

We have to assume the test would not discourage people with NANB hepatitis to continue donate the blood. Thus maintain a 10% rate.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2007
Posts: 451
Location: Earth
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Blood NANB [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2008, 15:04
E for me too.

there is no mention of other infectious deiseases so I thought A is irrelevant ? Is that fair conclusion regarding A?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Feb 2008
Posts: 315
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 1

Re: CR: Blood NANB [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2008, 16:24
prasannar wrote:
Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB hepatitis. Although the new screening tests are estimated to disqualify up to 5 percent of all prospective blood donors, they will still miss two-thirds of donors carrying NANB hepatitis. Therefore, about 10 percent of actual donors will still supply NANB-contaminated blood.
The argument above depends on which of the following assumptions?
(A) Donors carrying NANB hepatitis do not, in a large percentage of cases, carry other infections for which reliable screening tests are routinely performed.
(B) Donors carrying NANB hepatitis do not, in a large percentage of cases, develop the disease themselves at any point.
(C) The estimate of the number of donors who would be disqualified by tests for NANB hepatitis is an underestimate.
(D) The incidence of NANB hepatitis is lower among the potential blood donors than it is in the population at large.
(E) The donors who will still supply NANB-contaminated blood will donate blood at the average frequency for all donors.


I go for A. My reasoning below:

Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB hepatitis. Although the new screening tests are estimated to disqualify up to 5 percent of all prospective blood donors, they will still miss two-thirds of donors carrying NANB hepatitis. Therefore, about 10 percent of actual donors will still supply NANB-contaminated blood.
The argument above depends on which of the following assumptions?
(A) Donors carrying NANB hepatitis do not, in a large percentage of cases, carry other infections for which reliable screening tests are routinely performed. ( Very clearly assumed. The give away here in my opinion is the constant use of the word NANB hepatitis. The screening is to check for NANB and no other disease because the medics believe that any other infections will have been treated and detected so screening for NANB will be the only screening taking place. If they did carry other infections then it will be very ignorant of the staff to screen for just NANB.
(B) Donors carrying NANB hepatitis do not, in a large percentage of cases, develop the disease themselves at any point. ( Irrelevant to the argument, if they did it will not affect the argument. It's argument is not based around how they developed the disease)
(C) The estimate of the number of donors who would be disqualified by tests for NANB hepatitis is an underestimate. (This may be true but not assumed here. Even if they are it does not affect the argument.)
(D) The incidence of NANB hepatitis is lower among the potential blood donors than it is in the population at large. (Population mentioned here is a clue to indicate that this option is out of scope)
(E) The donors who will still supply NANB-contaminated blood will donate blood at the average frequency for all donors. (It may be true but even if they do not donate as much will the argument be affected? Nope) 8-) . The argument does not talk about frequency here.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2007
Posts: 451
Location: Earth
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Blood NANB [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2008, 16:56
So you ARE Einstein himself.

Agree with A on second thoughts. It IS better option than E
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1941
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 320 [0], given: 1

Premium Member
Re: CR: Blood NANB [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2008, 21:13
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 709
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 108 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Blood NANB [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2008, 22:57
OA is A
_________________

Persistence+Patience+Persistence+Patience=G...O...A...L

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1941
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 320 [0], given: 1

Premium Member
Re: CR: Blood NANB [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2008, 23:24
prasannar wrote:
OA is A


Can you explain A in a simpler way? I still not get it!
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Jun 2007
Posts: 171
Location: Vienna, Austria
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Blood NANB [#permalink] New post 05 Apr 2008, 00:37
guys, can anyone tell me why it´s not E ?

thanks!
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 709
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 108 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Blood NANB [#permalink] New post 06 Apr 2008, 18:28
Sondenso,

I opted for E and was surprised to see OA-A :?:

Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB hepatitis. Although the new screening tests are estimated to disqualify up to 5 percent of all prospective blood donors, they will still miss two-thirds of donors carrying NANB hepatitis. Therefore, about 10 percent of actual donors will still supply NANB-contaminated blood.

The argument above depends on which of the following assumptions?

(A) Donors carrying NANB hepatitis do not, in a large percentage of cases, carry other infections for which reliable screening tests are routinely performed.-> other infections seem to be irrelevant

(B) Donors carrying NANB hepatitis do not, in a large percentage of cases, develop the disease themselves at any point.->

(C) The estimate of the number of donors who would be disqualified by tests for NANB hepatitis is an underestimate.-> irrelevant

(D) The incidence of NANB hepatitis is lower among the potential blood donors than it is in the population at large.->irrelevant

(E) The donors who will still supply NANB-contaminated blood will donate blood at the average frequency for all donors-> The donor pool is intact thus seems to be apt, I picked E
_________________

Persistence+Patience+Persistence+Patience=G...O...A...L

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Posts: 464
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 6

Re: CR: Blood NANB [#permalink] New post 07 Apr 2008, 07:06
Well OA does make sense now. :roll:
Re: CR: Blood NANB   [#permalink] 07 Apr 2008, 07:06
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB rianah100 3 01 Dec 2005, 05:58
Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB mahesh004 4 19 Nov 2005, 09:07
Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB nakib77 3 01 Nov 2005, 03:42
Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB crisnas 20 26 Sep 2005, 10:11
Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB Janice 4 06 Dec 2004, 19:00
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.