Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Oct 2014, 13:21

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Book publishers have traditionally published a few books

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 940
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

Book publishers have traditionally published a few books [#permalink] New post 18 Jan 2010, 23:35
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

27% (02:06) correct 73% (01:17) wrong based on 13 sessions
Book publishers have traditionally published a few books that they thought were of intrinsic merit even though these books were unlikely to make a profit. Nowadays, however, fewer of these books are being published. It seems, therefore, that publishers now, more than ever, are more interested in making money than in publishing books of intrinsic value.

Which one of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?

A) Book publishers have always been interested in making money
B) There has been a notable decline in the quality of books written in recent years
C) In the past, often books of intrinsic value would unexpectedly make a sizable profit
D) There have always been authors unwilling to be published unless a profit is guaranteed
E) In recent years, profits in the book publishing industry have been declining
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 08 Nov 2009
Posts: 48
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink] New post 19 Jan 2010, 07:49
B
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Mar 2007
Posts: 62
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink] New post 19 Jan 2010, 08:19
Another B. OA pls
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Posts: 26
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink] New post 19 Jan 2010, 11:25
could be C

but doubt with the words: 'unlikely' in the question and 'unexpectedly' in the answer

but if something is unlikely to happen ... and it happens ... then it is said to have happened unexpectedly ...
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 147
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 1

Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink] New post 19 Jan 2010, 13:21
I think answer is C. OA please?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 155
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 9

Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink] New post 19 Jan 2010, 20:40
joemama142000 wrote:
Book publishers have traditionally published a few books that they thought were of intrinsic merit even though these books were unlikely to make a profit. Nowadays, however, fewer of these books are being published. It seems, therefore, that publishers now, more than ever, are more interested in making money than in publishing books of intrinsic value.

Which one of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?

A) Book publishers have always been interested in making money
B) There has been a notable decline in the quality of books written in recent years
C) In the past, often books of intrinsic value would unexpectedly make a sizable profit
D) There have always been authors unwilling to be published unless a profit is guaranteed
E) In recent years, profits in the book publishing industry have been declining


IMO "C".
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Dec 2009
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink] New post 20 Jan 2010, 03:25
IMHO D, since this introduce another reason why publication of intrinsic books could have reduced.
OA please?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Its Wow or Never
Joined: 11 Dec 2009
Posts: 208
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 670 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V40
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 7

Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink] New post 20 Jan 2010, 03:57
joemama142000 wrote:
Book publishers have traditionally published a few books that they thought were of intrinsic merit even though these books were unlikely to make a profit. Nowadays, however, fewer of these books are being published. It seems, therefore, that publishers now, more than ever, are more interested in making money than in publishing books of intrinsic value.

Which one of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?

A) Book publishers have always been interested in making money
B) There has been a notable decline in the quality of books written in recent years
C) In the past, often books of intrinsic value would unexpectedly make a sizable profit
D) There have always been authors unwilling to be published unless a profit is guaranteed
E) In recent years, profits in the book publishing industry have been declining

+1 for B
_________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you think you can,you can
If you think you can't,you are right.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Nov 2009
Posts: 6
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink] New post 20 Jan 2010, 04:02
Is it :A
Tuck Thread Master
User avatar
Joined: 20 Aug 2009
Posts: 312
Location: Tbilisi, Georgia
Schools: Stanford (in), Tuck (WL), Wharton (ding), Cornell (in)
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 69

Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink] New post 20 Jan 2010, 04:31
I'm considering (C) - Number of good quality books with intrinsic merits has decreased, publishers stayed the same
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 437
Schools: UT at Austin, Indiana State University, UC at Berkeley
WE 1: 5.5
WE 2: 5.5
WE 3: 6.0
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 16

Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink] New post 20 Jan 2010, 23:53
Why not E?

If the publishers profits have been declining over the years, they can no longer "afford" publishing the books, which they believe brings no profit but just expense. If they were doing it out of charity before, now as their profits are decreasing, they no longer can afford to do so.
_________________

Never give up,,,

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 08 Jan 2010
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink] New post 22 Jan 2010, 14:43
Can anybody please tell me what the official answer is?

My answer is A. The reason:

1. The conclusion says "nowadays, more than ever, book publishers ....."
2. I need to find a reason as to why it is not really profit that motivates book publishers nowadays especially as compared to before.

A answered this criterion best.

If the Official answer (is this what is being abbreviated as OA?) is something else, can you please explain?
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2009
Posts: 367
Schools: LBS, INSEAD, IMD, ISB - Anything with just 1 yr program.
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 101 [1] , given: 22

Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink] New post 22 Jan 2010, 18:15
1
This post received
KUDOS
joemama142000 wrote:
Book publishers have traditionally published a few books that they thought were of intrinsic merit even though these books were unlikely to make a profit. Nowadays, however, fewer of these books are being published. It seems, therefore, that publishers now, more than ever, are more interested in making money than in publishing books of intrinsic value.

Which one of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?

A) Book publishers have always been interested in making money
B) There has been a notable decline in the quality of books written in recent years
C) In the past, often books of intrinsic value would unexpectedly make a sizable profit
D) There have always been authors unwilling to be published unless a profit is guaranteed
E) In recent years, profits in the book publishing industry have been declining


Applying the classical PowerScore procedure of solving CR questions -

A and D are too exaggerated in stating "have always been". Stay away from over-hype. C does not explain how some books of intrinsic value generating sizable profit unexpectedly in the past is related to the publishers becoming more interested in only making more money. E on the other hand strengthens the conclusion, by stating that profits have been declining, it can easily be understood that publishers are looking to make more money.

After thus eliminating all other options - B is the sole contender. In other words, it is not that publishers are more interested in making more money but rather, the decline in good books that makes it seem like the publishers are getting greedier.
_________________

I am AWESOME and it's gonna be LEGENDARY!!!

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 940
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink] New post 24 Jan 2010, 23:42
OA is B
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Sep 2009
Posts: 62
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 2

Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink] New post 28 Jan 2010, 08:47
joemama142000 wrote:
Book publishers have traditionally published a few books that they thought were of intrinsic merit even though these books were unlikely to make a profit. Nowadays, however, fewer of these books are being published. It seems, therefore, that publishers now, more than ever, are more interested in making money than in publishing books of intrinsic value.

Which one of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?

A) Book publishers have always been interested in making money
B) There has been a notable decline in the quality of books written in recent years
C) In the past, often books of intrinsic value would unexpectedly make a sizable profit
D) There have always been authors unwilling to be published unless a profit is guaranteed
E) In recent years, profits in the book publishing industry have been declining


In B, it suggests that there is another factor(quality decline) to the fewer of these book publication: not because publishers more interested in making money.
_________________

I am not born to be a GENIUS nor a GMATTER. If you are struggling, we are in the same boat. Fight to the last!!

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Jan 2010
Posts: 26
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink] New post 28 Jan 2010, 23:17
+1 for B
Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published   [#permalink] 28 Jan 2010, 23:17
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Having recently published a series of science fiction books goodyear2013 1 03 Feb 2014, 03:44
publishing a book dws123 0 31 Jul 2012, 01:39
Experts publish their posts in the topic The largest trade-book publisher in the United States has pi10t 4 02 Sep 2007, 13:25
prepress printing, book publishing, pulications, books, chil sumit007 0 20 Mar 2012, 00:55
Knowledge@Wharton book publishing project Praetorian 5 22 Mar 2007, 12:16
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Book publishers have traditionally published a few books

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.