Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Status: Finally Done. Admitted in Kellogg for 2015 intake
Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Posts: 536
Location: United Kingdom
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V45
GPA: 2.9
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 74

Kudos [?]: 2959 [1] , given: 217

Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than $5000 [#permalink] ### Show Tags 09 Jun 2012, 13:42 1 This post received KUDOS 5 This post was BOOKMARKED 00:00 Difficulty: 25% (medium) Question Stats: 73% (01:48) correct 28% (00:50) wrong based on 240 sessions ### HideShow timer Statistics Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than$50000. Is Wilma's annual salary greater than Betty's?

(1) Betty's annual salary is closer to $50,000 than is Wilma's. (2) Betty's annual salary is closer to$35,000 than it is to Wilma's annual salary.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Best Regards,
E.

MGMAT 1 --> 530
MGMAT 2--> 640
MGMAT 3 ---> 610
GMAT ==> 730

Last edited by Bunuel on 28 Jan 2013, 07:19, edited 2 times in total.
Edited the OA
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 36566
Followers: 7078

Kudos [?]: 93176 [10] , given: 10553

Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2012, 13:52
10
KUDOS
Expert's post
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than $50000. Is Wilma's annual salary greater than Betty's? Notice that we are told that both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than$50,000.

(1) Betty's annual salary is closer to $50,000 than is Wilma's. ----$50,000---(Betty)----(Wilma)---- So, as you can see Wilma's annual salary is greater than Betty's. Sufficient.

(2) Betty's annual salary is closer to $35,000 than it is to Wilma's annual salary.$35,000----$50,000---(Betty)----(Wilma)---- Again Wilma's annual salary is greater than Betty's. Sufficient. Answer: D. Hope it's clear. _________________ Manager Joined: 12 May 2012 Posts: 83 Location: India Concentration: General Management, Operations GMAT 1: 650 Q51 V25 GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V38 GPA: 4 WE: General Management (Transportation) Followers: 2 Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 14 Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than [#permalink] ### Show Tags 10 Jun 2012, 00:34 Bunuel wrote: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than$50000. Is Wilma's annual salary greater than Betty's?

Notice that we are told that both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than $50,000. (1) Betty's annual salary is closer to$50,000 than is Wilma's.

----$50,000---(Betty)----(Wilma)---- So, as you can see Wilma's annual salary is greater than Betty's. Sufficient. (2) Betty's annual salary is closer to$35,000 than it is to Wilma's annual salary.

$35,000----$50,000---(Betty)----(Wilma)---- Again Wilma's annual salary is greater than Betty's. Sufficient.

Hope it's clear.

I believe that OA is wrong.
It should be D.

Kindly check the OA and edit it.

Bunuel - Your explanation is spot on.
Intern
Joined: 07 Jan 2013
Posts: 11
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 1

Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2013, 07:11
I am sorry, but the official answer does not make any sense for Statement 1. It is simply mathematically wrong.

Mathematically spoken the statement says: |Betty-50.000|<|Wilma-50.000| and not Betty-50.000 < Wilma-50.000
Let me make a numerical example. Betty earns 49.999 an Wilma earns 70.000. Obviously Betty's salary is closer than 50.000 though Wilma earns more. And the over way around: Let Betty earn 50.001 and Wilma 40.000, now still Betty's wage is closer to 50.000 though she now earns more than Wilma.

Stating that 1) is sufficient is simply wrong and I'm actually quite astonished people get away with such an answer so easily.

p.s.: The same argumentation holds for 2), so the correct answer must be C, as you can deduct from both statements that both wages must lie above 50.000; something you can't predict earlier.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 36566
Followers: 7078

Kudos [?]: 93176 [1] , given: 10553

Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2013, 07:24
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
ethnix wrote:
I am sorry, but the official answer does not make any sense for Statement 1. It is simply mathematically wrong.

Mathematically spoken the statement says: |Betty-50.000|<|Wilma-50.000| and not Betty-50.000 < Wilma-50.000
Let me make a numerical example. Betty earns 49.999 an Wilma earns 70.000. Obviously Betty's salary is closer than 50.000 though Wilma earns more. And the over way around: Let Betty earn 50.001 and Wilma 40.000, now still Betty's wage is closer to 50.000 though she now earns more than Wilma.

Stating that 1) is sufficient is simply wrong and I'm actually quite astonished people get away with such an answer so easily.

p.s.: The same argumentation holds for 2), so the correct answer must be C, as you can deduct from both statements that both wages must lie above 50.000; something you can't predict earlier.

Welcome to GMAT Club.

Your examples are not correct because we are told that "both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than $50000". Hope it's clear. _________________ Intern Joined: 07 Jan 2013 Posts: 11 Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 1 Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than [#permalink] ### Show Tags 28 Jan 2013, 07:27 Bunuel wrote: ethnix wrote: I am sorry, but the official answer does not make any sense for Statement 1. It is simply mathematically wrong. Mathematically spoken the statement says: |Betty-50.000|<|Wilma-50.000| and not Betty-50.000 < Wilma-50.000 Let me make a numerical example. Betty earns 49.999 an Wilma earns 70.000. Obviously Betty's salary is closer than 50.000 though Wilma earns more. And the over way around: Let Betty earn 50.001 and Wilma 40.000, now still Betty's wage is closer to 50.000 though she now earns more than Wilma. Stating that 1) is sufficient is simply wrong and I'm actually quite astonished people get away with such an answer so easily. p.s.: The same argumentation holds for 2), so the correct answer must be C, as you can deduct from both statements that both wages must lie above 50.000; something you can't predict earlier. Welcome to GMAT Club. Your examples are not correct because we are told that "both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than$50000".

Hope it's clear.

OMG, thanks. I suppose reading the question would avoid to most of my wrong answers :D
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 13451
Followers: 575

Kudos [?]: 163 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Jul 2014, 05:49
Hey guys just one small question.

If the test makers intended to say that Betty and Wilma's annual salaries put together was more than 50000 how could they have framed the question. I am non-native speaker so it kinda took me a while to know that they meant Betty > 50000 and Wilma > 50000. Plz help
_________________

Never give up, never celebrate, never leave your spot until it is finally over
We are winning this GMAT-war together

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 36566
Followers: 7078

Kudos [?]: 93176 [1] , given: 10553

### Show Tags

21 Oct 2015, 04:38
Bunuel wrote:
Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than $50000. Is Wilma's annual salary greater than Betty's? Notice that we are told that both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than$50,000.

(1) Betty's annual salary is closer to $50,000 than is Wilma's. ----$50,000---(Betty)----(Wilma)---- So, as you can see Wilma's annual salary is greater than Betty's. Sufficient.

(2) Betty's annual salary is closer to $35,000 than it is to Wilma's annual salary.$35,000----$50,000---(Betty)----(Wilma)---- Again Wilma's annual salary is greater than Betty's. Sufficient. Answer: D. Hope it's clear. I got the answer correct, but got completely confused with statement 2. Took a while to understand, but both scenarios led to the same answer, so was lucky here. My doubt here is between the two interpretations of statement 2. Namely, 1) Distance between Betty's salary and$35,000 < Distance between Betty's salary and Wilma's salary
1) Distance between Betty's salary and $35,000 < Distance between$35,000 and Wilma's salary

Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Posts: 2654
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Schools: Kellogg '18 (M)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Followers: 116

Kudos [?]: 1339 [0], given: 789

Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than $5000 [#permalink] ### Show Tags 21 Oct 2015, 04:45 rakshithbabu wrote: Bunuel wrote: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than$50000. Is Wilma's annual salary greater than Betty's?

Notice that we are told that both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than $50,000. (1) Betty's annual salary is closer to$50,000 than is Wilma's.

----$50,000---(Betty)----(Wilma)---- So, as you can see Wilma's annual salary is greater than Betty's. Sufficient. (2) Betty's annual salary is closer to$35,000 than it is to Wilma's annual salary.

$35,000----$50,000---(Betty)----(Wilma)---- Again Wilma's annual salary is greater than Betty's. Sufficient.

Hope it's clear.

I got the answer correct, but got completely confused with statement 2. Took a while to understand, but both scenarios led to the same answer, so was lucky here.
My doubt here is between the two interpretations of statement 2. Namely,
1) Distance between Betty's salary and $35,000 < Distance between Betty's salary and Wilma's salary 2) Distance between Betty's salary and$35,000 < Distance between $35,000 and Wilma's salary Bunuel , Please help decipher these kind of statements. Let me try to help. First of, do not waste time in doubting the official questions. I agree the placement of "it" is kind of ambiguous but both the versions (it=Betty's and it=35000) will lead to the same conclusion of Betty's salary < Wilma's salary as we are given that both the salaries are >50000. _________________ Thursday with Ron updated list as of July 1st, 2015: http://gmatclub.com/forum/consolidated-thursday-with-ron-list-for-all-the-sections-201006.html#p1544515 Rules for Posting in Quant Forums: http://gmatclub.com/forum/rules-for-posting-please-read-this-before-posting-133935.html Writing Mathematical Formulae in your posts: http://gmatclub.com/forum/rules-for-posting-please-read-this-before-posting-133935.html#p1096628 GMATCLUB Math Book: http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-math-book-in-downloadable-pdf-format-130609.html Everything Related to Inequalities: http://gmatclub.com/forum/inequalities-made-easy-206653.html#p1582891 Inequalities tips: http://gmatclub.com/forum/inequalities-tips-and-hints-175001.html Debrief, 650 to 750: http://gmatclub.com/forum/650-to-750-a-10-month-journey-to-the-score-203190.html Math Revolution GMAT Instructor Joined: 16 Aug 2015 Posts: 2602 GPA: 3.82 Followers: 172 Kudos [?]: 1435 [0], given: 0 Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than$5000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Oct 2015, 10:51
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.

Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than $50000. Is Wilma's annual salary greater than Betty's? (1) Betty's annual salary is closer to$50,000 than is Wilma's.
(2) Betty's annual salary is closer to $35,000 than it is to Wilma's annual salary. In the original condition, we can let Betty's annual salary=b, Wilma's annual salary=w. Then, there are 2 variables and 3 equations from the question and the conditions, so there is high chance (D) will be our answer. Condition 1 is sufficient as it answers the question 'yes' Condition 2 is also sufficient for the same reason, so the answer becomes (D). For cases where we need 1 more equation, such as original conditions with “1 variable”, or “2 variables and 1 equation”, or “3 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 59 % chance that D is the answer, while A or B has 38% chance and C or E has 3% chance. Since D is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition. Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, C or E. _________________ MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spare The one-and-only World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy. Find a 10% off coupon code for GMAT Club members. “Receive 5 Math Questions & Solutions Daily” Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons - try it yourself See our Youtube demo GMAT Club Legend Joined: 09 Sep 2013 Posts: 13451 Followers: 575 Kudos [?]: 163 [0], given: 0 Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than$5000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Oct 2016, 06:06
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than $5000 [#permalink] 26 Oct 2016, 06:06 Similar topics Replies Last post Similar Topics: 2 Is Fred taller than Wilma? 2 21 Mar 2016, 06:27 3 Last year, department A earned 35% more than department B did. 3 26 Feb 2016, 01:29 1 Last year, 'Crazy Matt's Electronics' earned 90% more than did 'Sane D 2 26 Sep 2015, 06:44 1 Each day at Dan’s new job, he earns$10 more than the day before 2 25 Nov 2014, 08:29
2 Sue s monthly earnings consist of a monthly salary and a 4 4 27 Dec 2010, 12:58
Display posts from previous: Sort by