Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 19 Apr 2014, 22:15

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Brought before a military tribunal for crimes that he claims

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5253
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 110 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
Brought before a military tribunal for crimes that he claims [#permalink] New post 13 Oct 2005, 23:38
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Brought before a military tribunal for crimes that he claims not to have committed, the soldier`s lawyer vehemently denied that the young man had any part in the wrongdoing.


(A) the soldier`s lawyer vehemently denied that the young man had any part in the wrongdoing
(B) the lawyer retained by the soldier vehemently denied that he had had any part in the wrongdoing
(C) the lawyer retained by the soldier vehemently denied that the young man has had any part in the wrongdoing
(D) the soldier vehemently denied that he had any part in the wrongdoing
(E) the soldier vehemently denied that he had had any part in the wrongdoing
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 May 2005
Posts: 12
Location: Somewhere
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 13 Oct 2005, 23:47
I think subject is solder so left D and E.
I vote for E because it uses "had had" (the action that happed before he denied)
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 422
Location: India, Chennai
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC Modifiers [#permalink] New post 13 Oct 2005, 23:48
GMATT73 wrote:
Brought before a military tribunal for crimes that he claims not to have committed, the soldier`s lawyer vehemently denied that the young man had any part in the wrongdoing.


(A) the soldier`s lawyer vehemently denied that the young man had any part in the wrongdoing
(B) the lawyer retained by the soldier vehemently denied that he had had any part in the wrongdoing
(C) the lawyer retained by the soldier vehemently denied that the young man has had any part in the wrongdoing
(D) the soldier vehemently denied that he had any part in the wrongdoing
(E) the soldier vehemently denied that he had had any part in the wrongdoing


My answer is D. It is the soldier who stands the trial, not the lawyer. I choose D.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1902
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 14 Oct 2005, 02:00
yes, my choice is D coz "he" modifies " the soldier" .
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 460
Location: New York
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC Modifiers [#permalink] New post 14 Oct 2005, 06:48
Go with D.

Eliminate A, B and C for wrong reference.

Between D and E, I chose D because the extra "had" is not necessary

GMATT73 wrote:
Brought before a military tribunal for crimes that he claims not to have committed, the soldier`s lawyer vehemently denied that the young man had any part in the wrongdoing.


(A) the soldier`s lawyer vehemently denied that the young man had any part in the wrongdoing
(B) the lawyer retained by the soldier vehemently denied that he had had any part in the wrongdoing
(C) the lawyer retained by the soldier vehemently denied that the young man has had any part in the wrongdoing
(D) the soldier vehemently denied that he had any part in the wrongdoing
(E) the soldier vehemently denied that he had had any part in the wrongdoing
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 202
Location: New York
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 14 Oct 2005, 07:55
complicated wrote:
I think subject is solder so left D and E.
I vote for E because it uses "had had" (the action that happed before he denied)


I am comfused over the same issue. What is the OA? :?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Jun 2005
Posts: 38
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 14 Oct 2005, 08:08
i would stick with A

all the sentences modify the lawyer who was brought in the court.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 119
Location: Bangalore, India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 14 Oct 2005, 09:10
I would go for D. Whu had had in E? What does it mean? Please explain...
VP
VP
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 1128
Location: CA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 14 Oct 2005, 09:32
E.

"had had" is past perfect. Used if we need to point to an event Before some other event in the past.

A,B,C streight out. We should not attribute crime to lawyer :)
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5099
Location: Singapore
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 14 Oct 2005, 10:12
We need the noun 'soldier' to come first. So we need to consider D or E>

Between the two, E is a better choice. We need the past perfect form 'had had' to imply that the soldier has nothing to do with the wrongdoing. The first 'had' is for the for past tense nature of the sentence (solider brought before...) and the second 'had' is even further back behind the timeline as the wrongdoing occured before the trial.

E is the best choice.
Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3411
Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 148 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 14 Oct 2005, 11:46
D is OK. I think simple past would do...we are not differentiating between two events..at least i dont see the logic of the two events..

brought before W, the solider denied that he had anything to do with XYZ, is fine...
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1743
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 14 Oct 2005, 13:43
I will choose E.
Firstly, it uses correct modifier and secondly it uses correct past perfect tense.
_________________

hey ya......

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1902
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 14 Oct 2005, 21:21
"denied that" here start an indirect speech.
Imagine we were in that court and heard the soldier's direct denying, he would say this way " I have no part in the wrongdoing" :!: . Of coz, he would use present tense here to describe a fact . If he had denied " I had no part in the wrongdoing" , it would have meant that he, at the time at the court, had a part in wrongdoing. Anyway, it's only my opinion :roll:
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1737
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC Modifiers [#permalink] New post 14 Oct 2005, 21:33
E. i think we need PP tense to express an event that happenbed earlier than the later one in a sequence of events.
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5253
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 110 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 15 Oct 2005, 08:45
OA is E.

Explanation:
Spot the Error:
The descriptive phrase, "brought before...committed", indicates the modifier is being tested.

Rule and Fix:
A Modifier must be as close as possible to the thing it describes, in this case the phrase should modify the solider not the lawyer.

POE:
A, B, and C all place the lawyer directly after the phrase causing the phrase to modify the lawyer.

Chunk and Compare:
Compare D to E.
The difference is in the verbs. D uses the simple past (had) while E uses the Past Perfect (had had). Since there are 2 past events in the sentence that must be ordered (brought before the tribunal and denying) the past perfect is most appropiate.

Reread your choice:
Choose E.
  [#permalink] 15 Oct 2005, 08:45
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Popular new posts Puritan fanatics brought to civil and military affairs a Geethu 10 05 Aug 2004, 07:39
New posts Brought before a military tribunal for crimes that he claims GMATT73 8 29 Apr 2005, 02:53
New posts Puritan fanatics brought to civil and military affairs a FN 3 23 Sep 2005, 15:54
Popular new posts Puritan fanatics brought to civil and military affairs a gamjatang 22 08 Dec 2005, 08:06
New posts Puritan fanatics brought to civil and military affairs a arjsingh1976 7 22 Nov 2006, 14:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Brought before a military tribunal for crimes that he claims

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.