|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 483
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
Brushing your teeth regularly, no matter which toothpaste [#permalink]
21 Feb 2006, 19:38
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
100% (01:48) wrong based on 0 sessions
Brushing your teeth regularly, no matter which toothpaste you use, will reduce your chances of tooth decay. Scientists have concluded that, when you brush, you reduce tooth decay by removing the film of plaque that forms on teeth and gums. So, you can forget about fluorides: brush your teeth carefully and say goodbye to cavities.
Which one of the following is a criticism of the reasoning in the argument?
(A) Brushing with fluoride toothpaste has been shown to reduce tooth decay.
(B) The fact that brushing will reduce tooth decay does not show that fluorides are of no value.
(C) Few people adequately remove plaque by brushing.
(D) People have plaque on their teeth most of the time.
(E) Scientists have been wrong about fluorides.
Please answer with explanation
OA after discussion...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 216
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
Struck between A and B.
But, will go for B since A is just a statement of fact and does not criticize.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2005
Posts: 140
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
agree with B.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 138
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 0
|
yes agree with B
"forget about fluorides" ..is the weak link that gives it away.
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5134
Location: Singapore
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
87
[1] , given: 0
|
1
This post received KUDOS
Premise:
1) Burshing teeth regularly will reduce chance of decay
2) Scientist conclude -> brushing reduce tooth decay by removing film of plague
3) Choice of toothpaste does not matter
Conclusion
4) Just brush carefully and forget about flourides
B is the best choice. We need to attack the conclusion here. The writer concludes that
brushing alone will reduce chances of tooth decay because it removes the film of plague that forms on teeth and gum. It has failed to provide evidence that flouride might be nescessary to complement the brushing or fluoride is completely redundant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 277
Location: Chennai,India
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
I too will pick B , thats what a critique will comment.
_________________
vazlkaiye porkalam vazltuthan parkanum.... porkalam maralam porkalthan maruma
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5289
Followers: 17
Kudos [?]:
91
[0], given: 0
|
Yes, (B) is best. Flourides can help protect the teeth (for example by strengthening the enamel) in other ways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1134
Location: India
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
22
[0], given: 1
|
Between A and B, B sounds more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 483
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
OA is B
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 06 Aug 2005
Posts: 91
Location: Minneapolis
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
Using POE
D and E are out of scope
A is rephrasing the evidence that brushing with any tooth paste will reduce tooth decay
C could have been correct if 'carefully' had been used at the end.
Hence B
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Posts: 1068
Location: CA
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
12
[0], given: 0
|
Late but 'B' is best
p.s. brush after every meal a day keeps the dentists away
_________________
Don't be afraid to take a flying leap of faith.. If you risk nothing, than you gain nothing...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 47
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
54
[0], given: 0
|
chuckle wrote: Struck between A and B. But, will go for B since A is just a statement of fact and does not criticize. Is it not possible to use a fact statement as a base to criticize some argument.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 47
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
54
[2] , given: 0
|
Re: CR - Brushing Teeth [#permalink]
21 Dec 2008, 02:03
2
This post received KUDOS
Fact 1: Brushing your teeth regularly, no matter which toothpaste you use, will reduce your chances of tooth decay. Fact 2: Scientists have concluded that, when you brush, you reduce tooth decay by removing the film of plaque that forms on teeth and gums. Conclusion: So, you can forget about fluorides: brush your teeth carefully and say goodbye to cavities. Point to be noted : No flouride in Facts, still conclusion says irrelavently that flourides are useless. So, there is no justification for that. If you get it, you strike the nail on forehead. Clear B. Moreover, only A/B/E only discuss flourides in conclusion, thus only qualify for being contenders. E is out of scope. So fight is basically between A and B here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 21 Dec 2008
Posts: 80
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
24
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR - Brushing Teeth [#permalink]
28 Dec 2008, 07:34
another B
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 08 Jun 2008
Posts: 3
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR - Brushing Teeth [#permalink]
28 Dec 2008, 07:40
I am in hestitation. Through this case, I think the correct answer just can be A or B. But I don't know which one is better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: CR - Brushing Teeth
[#permalink]
28 Dec 2008, 07:40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|