Building a space station, in which astronauts would live for : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 05 Dec 2016, 14:06

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Building a space station, in which astronauts would live for

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Status: Dedicates 2013 to MBA !!
Joined: 06 Jul 2012
Posts: 56
Location: United States (MI)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GPA: 3.8
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 149 [3] , given: 14

Building a space station, in which astronauts would live for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Dec 2012, 12:50
3
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

49% (02:32) correct 51% (01:39) wrong based on 328 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Building a space station, in which astronauts would live for a considerable time, is essential even if the space station project were to contribute no new knowledge about space or Earth that could not otherwise be obtained. For future missions to explore Mars, we will need the medical knowledge that the space station project will give us about the limits human capacities to live in spacecraft for an extended time.

The argument makes the assumption that

(A) the exploration of Mars will be carried out by people travelling in spacecraft and not by robots alone.
(B) the capacities of astronauts are typical of those of ordinary human beings
(C) no unforeseen medical problems will arise on the first mission to explore mars
(D) a mission to Mars will be the first of many missions that will explore the solar system
(E) living in spaceship for an extended time presents insurmountable medical problems

OA after some discussion
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Thanks and Regards,
Charu Kapoor

Never Never Never GIVE UP !!
Consider KUDOS in case I was able to help you.

If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 447
Location: India
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 385 [1] , given: 14

Re: Assumption LSAT Question [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Dec 2012, 15:30
1
KUDOS
CharuKapoor wrote:
Building a space station, in which astronauts would live for a considerable time, is essential even if the space station project were to contribute no new knowledge about space or Earth that could not otherwise be obtained. For future missions to explore Mars, we will need the medical knowledge that the space station project will give us about the limits human capacities to live in spacecraft for an extended time.

The argument makes the assumption that

(A) the exploration of Mars will be carried out by people travelling in spacecraft and not by robots alone.
(B) the capacities of astronauts are typical of those of ordinary human beings
(C) no unforeseen medical problems will arise on the first mission to explore mars
(D) a mission to Mars will be the first of many missions that will explore the solar system
(E) living in spaceship for an extended time presents insurmountable medical problems

OA after some discussion

Premise: "For future missions to explore Mars, we will need the medical knowledge that the space station project will give us about the limits human capacities to live in spacecraft for an extended time."

assumption: because humans are needed for space missions to mars

Conclusion: So, "building a space station, in which astronauts would live for a considerable time, is essential"

If choice A is not assumed i.e, if humans are not needed for future missions, then the argument is not true. Therefore choice A.
_________________

Srinivasan Vaidyaraman
Sravna
http://www.sravnatestprep.com

Classroom and Online Coaching

Intern
Joined: 04 Feb 2013
Posts: 11
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 660 Q46 V36
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [1] , given: 8

Re: Building a space station, in which astronauts would live for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Aug 2013, 01:41
1
KUDOS
A is essential to the argument, but so is B. How did you eliminate B? If the capacities of astronauts are NOT typical of those of ordinary human beings, then how can the argument "about the limits human capacities to live in spacecraft " still stand? Thanks in advance!
Intern
Joined: 18 Jun 2013
Posts: 8
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Building a space station, in which astronauts would live for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2013, 12:50
Quote:
A is essential to the argument, but so is B. How did you eliminate B? If the capacities of astronauts are NOT typical of those of ordinary human beings, then how can the argument "about the limits human capacities to live in spacecraft " still stand? Thanks in advance!

Option B is not correct. It can not be an assumption, as it has been mentioned in the argument. First line states that: Space stations in which, astronauts will live for a considerable time. The last line states: the space station project will give us about the limits human capacities to live in spacecraft for an extended time. So, it is obvious that astronauts will be human being with same capabilities. An assumption is an unstated fact, for argument to hold true.

Hope that helps.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10438
Followers: 884

Kudos [?]: 191 [0], given: 0

Re: Building a space station, in which astronauts would live for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2015, 00:35
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2013
Posts: 180
GMAT 1: 590 Q40 V30
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V40
WE: Project Management (Entertainment and Sports)
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 121 [0], given: 29

Re: Building a space station, in which astronauts would live for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2015, 09:40
CharuKapoor wrote:
Building a space station, in which astronauts would live for a considerable time, is essential even if the space station project were to contribute no new knowledge about space or Earth that could not otherwise be obtained. For future missions to explore Mars, we will need the medical knowledge that the space station project will give us about the limits human capacities to live in spacecraft for an extended time.

The argument makes the assumption that

(A) the exploration of Mars will be carried out by people travelling in spacecraft and not by robots alone.
(B) the capacities of astronauts are typical of those of ordinary human beings
(C) no unforeseen medical problems will arise on the first mission to explore mars
(D) a mission to Mars will be the first of many missions that will explore the solar system
(E) living in spaceship for an extended time presents insurmountable medical problems

OA after some discussion

Between A and B. In my opinion both have potential to be viable assumptions, but were A to be true the entire argument would fall. Let's look at B If astronauts have greater capabilities than those of humans then it is very likely that the medical knowlodge the machines installed at the space station will gather is be tailored and aimed at astronauts' capabilites; If machines were taught to gather and test data relative to ordinary human beings- knowing that astronauts are trained to endure harsher environments- that would result in both a waste of time and a splurge of money.

On the other hand, reversing A future space missions would be carried by robots; bankrolling the space station would be a splurge, since robots are not very likely going to be affected in the same way as humans.

the answer is A. Not easy though.

hope it helps
_________________

learn the rules of the game, then play better than anyone else.

SVP
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2070
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Stanford '19
GMAT 1: 550 Q39 V27
GMAT 2: 560 Q42 V26
GMAT 3: 560 Q43 V24
GMAT 4: 650 Q49 V30
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 247 [0], given: 124

Re: Building a space station, in which astronauts would live for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Mar 2016, 18:41
if we negate A, the argument breaks down.
A is the assumption..the other ones can easily be eliminated.
Re: Building a space station, in which astronauts would live for   [#permalink] 30 Mar 2016, 18:41
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
16 Advertisement in the Harptown Train Station:... 7 03 Oct 2013, 04:31
2 In 2009, a private school spent \$200,000 on a building which 12 19 Jan 2013, 03:47
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the 1 29 Nov 2011, 19:06
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the 8 09 Aug 2010, 16:27
1 Astronauts who experience weightlessness frequently get 8 07 Jun 2009, 02:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Building a space station, in which astronauts would live for

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.