Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 19 Sep 2014, 10:27

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
7 KUDOS received
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1406
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 117 [7] , given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would [#permalink] New post 17 Jul 2008, 09:56
7
This post received
KUDOS
7
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

19% (01:36) correct 81% (00:53) wrong based on 810 sessions
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would constitute a wasteful use of resources, on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone.

(A) on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone
(B) on the grounds of avoiding duplicated facilities alone
(C) solely in that duplicated facilities should be avoided
(D) while the duplication of facilities should be avoided
(E) if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoided

I dont understand the OA at all
share explanations
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 328
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC - tough [#permalink] New post 17 Jul 2008, 19:26
IMO B

(A) on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone
(B) on the grounds of avoiding duplicated facilities alone
(C) solely in that duplicated facilities should be avoided
(D) while the duplication of facilities should be avoided
(E) if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoided

We need "on the grounds" after teh comma so A and B remain; after the comma we need to provide a reason as to why building new hosptials is wasting resources

B. building .............. has to be parallel with ........avoiding
E. "if" construction is wrong
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 May 2008
Posts: 165
Location: Mumbai
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC - tough [#permalink] New post 17 Jul 2008, 21:07
C, D and E are wrong - the reason needs to be there, and like it has been mentioned, after the comma, it should be "on the...
For that B is the most appropriate. What is the OA?
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1406
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC - tough [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2008, 20:04
I welcome further explanation for the same .Since OA is not (B)
Will post the OA shortly
_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 658
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 7

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC - tough [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2008, 20:12
spriya wrote:
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would constitute a wasteful use of resources, on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone.

(A) on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone
(B) on the grounds of avoiding duplicated facilities alone
(C) solely in that duplicated facilities should be avoided
(D) while the duplication of facilities should be avoided
(E) if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoided


I dont understand the OA at all
share explanations


IMO E. "If" is ok here because its a different clause.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1406
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC - tough [#permalink] New post 19 Jul 2008, 05:05
rao_1857 wrote:
spriya wrote:
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would constitute a wasteful use of resources, on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone.

(A) on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone
(B) on the grounds of avoiding duplicated facilities alone
(C) solely in that duplicated facilities should be avoided
(D) while the duplication of facilities should be avoided
(E) if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoided


I dont understand the OA at all
share explanations


IMO E. "If" is ok here because its a different clause.


OA is (E) but i still wonder whats wrong with (B) :( can someoine explain this funda
_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

22 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 658
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 63 [22] , given: 7

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC - tough [#permalink] New post 19 Jul 2008, 06:19
22
This post received
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
spriya wrote:
rao_1857 wrote:
spriya wrote:
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would constitute a wasteful use of resources, on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone.

(A) on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone
(B) on the grounds of avoiding duplicated facilities alone
(C) solely in that duplicated facilities should be avoided
(D) while the duplication of facilities should be avoided
(E) if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoided


I dont understand the OA at all
share explanations


IMO E. "If" is ok here because its a different clause.


OA is (E) but i still wonder whats wrong with (B) :( can someoine explain this funda


The way I approached this is that you have a conditional uncertainity in 1st clause "would" which depends of sth that "should happen". When ever you have uncertain words (may, might, should, would, can , could), always make sure that the answer choice you are choosing is not distorting the meaning by make sth 'hypothetical' to 'actual'.

After this we are left with C, D and E. C and D is again not a clear contruction.

Again: 'IF' and 'would' SHOULD not come in same clause (if they are scratch that answer choice). But it is OK to have 'em in different clause. Also if you take a close look, this is a typical IF...then condition scentence. Using IF is ok here.

Hope this help
Thanks
3 KUDOS received
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1406
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 117 [3] , given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC - tough [#permalink] New post 19 Jul 2008, 09:58
3
This post received
KUDOS
rao_1857 wrote:
spriya wrote:
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would constitute a wasteful use of resources, on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone.

(A) on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone
(B) on the grounds of avoiding duplicated facilities alone
(C) solely in that duplicated facilities should be avoided
(D) while the duplication of facilities should be avoided
(E) if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoided


I dont understand the OA at all
share explanations


IMO E. "If" is ok here because its a different clause.


OA is (E) but i still wonder whats wrong with (B) :( can someoine explain this funda[/quote]

The way I approached this is that you have a conditional uncertainity in 1st clause "would" which depends of sth that "should happen". When ever you have uncertain words (may, might, should, would, can , could), always make sure that the answer choice you are choosing is not distorting the meaning by make sth 'hypothetical' to 'actual'.

After this we are left with C, D and E. C and D is again not a clear contruction.

Again: 'IF' and 'would' SHOULD not come in same clause (if they are scratch that answer choice). But it is OK to have 'em in different clause. Also if you take a close look, this is a typical IF...then condition scentence. Using IF is ok here.

Hope this help
Thanks[/quote]

good explanation
Thank u
_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 328
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 71 [2] , given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC - tough [#permalink] New post 19 Jul 2008, 11:42
2
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The way I approached this is that you have a conditional uncertainity in 1st clause "would" which depends of sth that "should happen". When ever you have uncertain words (may, might, should, would, can , could), always make sure that the answer choice you are choosing is not distorting the meaning by make sth 'hypothetical' to 'actual'.

After this we are left with C, D and E. C and D is again not a clear contruction.

Again: 'IF' and 'would' SHOULD not come in same clause (if they are scratch that answer choice). But it is OK to have 'em in different clause. Also if you take a close look, this is a typical IF...then condition scentence. Using IF is ok here.

Hope this help
Thanks[/quote]

Good explanation rao_1857. Kudos for you.
3 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 658
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 63 [3] , given: 7

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC - tough [#permalink] New post 19 Jul 2008, 21:54
3
This post received
KUDOS
x97agarwal wrote:
The way I approached this is that you have a conditional uncertainity in 1st clause "would" which depends of sth that "should happen". When ever you have uncertain words (may, might, should, would, can , could), always make sure that the answer choice you are choosing is not distorting the meaning by make sth 'hypothetical' to 'actual'.

After this we are left with C, D and E. C and D is again not a clear contruction.

Again: 'IF' and 'would' SHOULD not come in same clause (if they are scratch that answer choice). But it is OK to have 'em in different clause. Also if you take a close look, this is a typical IF...then condition scentence. Using IF is ok here.

Hope this help
Thanks


Good explanation rao_1857. Kudos for you.[/quote]



THANKS x97agarwal,

You made my day Man!!!!!!!!!

My first Kudo!

:cool :band :musband :musband :musband :banana :woohoo :yell :wave

THANKS AGAIN!!!
8 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 31 Mar 2007
Posts: 586
Location: Canada eh
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 39 [8] , given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC - tough [#permalink] New post 19 Jul 2008, 22:52
8
This post received
KUDOS
This is a typical subjunctive mood question.

The subjunctive mood is when you have a sentence that refers to an opinion, a wish, etc. Something to the contrary.

If you read a sentence and you get a feel for the subjunctive mood, always match an IF with a WOULD. Also if you see a were/if/would, boom, that's your answer. Classic subjunctive mood.

eg.

I would most definitely buy a Ferrari Enzo, if I were to accumulate enough cash.
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2009
Posts: 365
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 207 [1] , given: 47

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Re: SC - tough [#permalink] New post 28 Jan 2010, 11:21
1
This post received
KUDOS
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would constitute a wasteful use of resources, on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone.

(A) on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone
(B) on the grounds of avoiding duplicated facilities alone
(C) solely in that duplicated facilities should be avoided
(D) while the duplication of facilities should be avoided
(E) if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoided

IMO E.... as E gives the reason or support so as to why the Building large new hospitals would be be wasteful!

Something on the lines..... X would be useless, if ..Y is the condition!
For me A sounds too word with of abundance in it
B - ground of avoiding is not the right tense of verb to be used here
C & D - dont give the condition of the stand taken in the clause before
_________________

Cheers!
JT...........
If u like my post..... payback in Kudos!! :beer

|Do not post questions with OA|Please underline your SC questions while posting|Try posting the explanation along with your answer choice|
|For CR refer Powerscore CR Bible|For SC refer Manhattan SC Guide|


~~Better Burn Out... Than Fade Away~~

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2009
Posts: 485
Location: Bangalore,India
WE 1: 4yrs in IT Industry
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 108 [0], given: 335

Re: SC - tough [#permalink] New post 14 Mar 2010, 18:58
Good Question Discussed thanku
_________________

One Final Try.......

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Posts: 139
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 2

Re: SC - tough [#permalink] New post 06 May 2010, 08:28
I chose option B but OA says otherwise :(
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2009
Posts: 132
Location: London
Schools: Haas (WL), Kellogg (matricultating), Stanford (R2, ding), Columbia (ding)
WE 1: 3 years hotel industry sales and marketing France
WE 2: 3 years financial industry marketing UK
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 10

Re: SC - tough [#permalink] New post 06 May 2010, 11:55
I understand the explanations around the need for "if" after subjunctive mood, it does make sense. But I really don't get what the "only" is doing in the sentence. To me that sound very awkward... so I guess I didn't understand the meaning of the whole sentence.

anyone can clarify this?
_________________

Yes I can!

2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Nov 2009
Posts: 51
Location: San Diego, CA
WE 1: 6 years - Telecom
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [2] , given: 11

Re: SC - tough [#permalink] New post 06 May 2010, 17:09
2
This post received
KUDOS
"If only because" is a special phrase. It is sometimes expressed more fully as "if for no other reason than (that)"
_________________

If you won't invest in yourself, why would anybody wants to invest in you?

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2009
Posts: 132
Location: London
Schools: Haas (WL), Kellogg (matricultating), Stanford (R2, ding), Columbia (ding)
WE 1: 3 years hotel industry sales and marketing France
WE 2: 3 years financial industry marketing UK
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 10

Re: SC - tough [#permalink] New post 06 May 2010, 22:15
had no idea about that expression! thanks klughing
_________________

Yes I can!

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 164
Location: India
Schools: ISB
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 14

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC - tough [#permalink] New post 07 May 2010, 20:24
x97agarwal wrote:
The way I approached this is that you have a conditional uncertainity in 1st clause "would" which depends of sth that "should happen". When ever you have uncertain words (may, might, should, would, can , could), always make sure that the answer choice you are choosing is not distorting the meaning by make sth 'hypothetical' to 'actual'.

After this we are left with C, D and E. C and D is again not a clear contruction.

Again: 'IF' and 'would' SHOULD not come in same clause (if they are scratch that answer choice). But it is OK to have 'em in different clause. Also if you take a close look, this is a typical IF...then condition scentence. Using IF is ok here.

Hope this help
Thanks


Quote:
Excellent explanation Rao....

+1 Kudos... :-D
_________________

_________________
If you like my post, consider giving me a kudos. THANKS!

3 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 995
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 400 [3] , given: 36

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC - tough [#permalink] New post 17 Jul 2010, 21:42
3
This post received
KUDOS
No one spoke about the duplicated facilities / duplication of facilities.

Latter is correct. Between D and E.

E it is.
_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Dec 2010
Posts: 145
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 12

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC - tough [#permalink] New post 21 Mar 2011, 08:04
I've never heard of "If only because" before this...thanks
Re: SC - tough   [#permalink] 21 Mar 2011, 08:04
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would wild_desperado 10 28 Jun 2005, 04:26
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would banerjeea_98 7 08 Feb 2005, 08:33
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would nzgmat 1 01 Dec 2004, 14:56
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would Janice 3 11 Nov 2004, 19:47
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would jxx 2 28 Sep 2004, 09:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 40 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.