Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 19 Jan 2017, 22:27

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

VP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1397
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 290 [10] , given: 0

Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2008, 09:56
10
KUDOS
54
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

20% (01:51) correct 80% (00:58) wrong based on 2160 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would constitute a wasteful use of resources, on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone.

(A) on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone
(B) on the grounds of avoiding duplicated facilities alone
(C) solely in that duplicated facilities should be avoided
(D) while the duplication of facilities should be avoided
(E) if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoided

I dont understand the OA at all
share explanations
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

If you have any questions
New!
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 326
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 293 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2008, 19:26
IMO B

(A) on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone
(B) on the grounds of avoiding duplicated facilities alone
(C) solely in that duplicated facilities should be avoided
(D) while the duplication of facilities should be avoided
(E) if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoided

We need "on the grounds" after teh comma so A and B remain; after the comma we need to provide a reason as to why building new hosptials is wasting resources

B. building .............. has to be parallel with ........avoiding
E. "if" construction is wrong
Manager
Joined: 19 May 2008
Posts: 165
Location: Mumbai
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2008, 21:07
C, D and E are wrong - the reason needs to be there, and like it has been mentioned, after the comma, it should be "on the...
For that B is the most appropriate. What is the OA?
VP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1397
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 290 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2008, 20:04
I welcome further explanation for the same .Since OA is not (B)
Will post the OA shortly
_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

Director
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 658
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 111 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2008, 20:12
spriya wrote:
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would constitute a wasteful use of resources, on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone.

(A) on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone
(B) on the grounds of avoiding duplicated facilities alone
(C) solely in that duplicated facilities should be avoided
(D) while the duplication of facilities should be avoided
(E) if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoided

I dont understand the OA at all
share explanations

IMO E. "If" is ok here because its a different clause.
VP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1397
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 290 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2008, 05:05
rao_1857 wrote:
spriya wrote:
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would constitute a wasteful use of resources, on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone.

(A) on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone
(B) on the grounds of avoiding duplicated facilities alone
(C) solely in that duplicated facilities should be avoided
(D) while the duplication of facilities should be avoided
(E) if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoided

I dont understand the OA at all
share explanations

IMO E. "If" is ok here because its a different clause.

OA is (E) but i still wonder whats wrong with (B) can someoine explain this funda
_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

Director
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 658
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 111 [36] , given: 7

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2008, 06:19
36
KUDOS
11
This post was
BOOKMARKED
spriya wrote:
rao_1857 wrote:
spriya wrote:
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would constitute a wasteful use of resources, on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone.

(A) on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone
(B) on the grounds of avoiding duplicated facilities alone
(C) solely in that duplicated facilities should be avoided
(D) while the duplication of facilities should be avoided
(E) if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoided

I dont understand the OA at all
share explanations

IMO E. "If" is ok here because its a different clause.

OA is (E) but i still wonder whats wrong with (B) can someoine explain this funda

The way I approached this is that you have a conditional uncertainity in 1st clause "would" which depends of sth that "should happen". When ever you have uncertain words (may, might, should, would, can , could), always make sure that the answer choice you are choosing is not distorting the meaning by make sth 'hypothetical' to 'actual'.

After this we are left with C, D and E. C and D is again not a clear contruction.

Again: 'IF' and 'would' SHOULD not come in same clause (if they are scratch that answer choice). But it is OK to have 'em in different clause. Also if you take a close look, this is a typical IF...then condition scentence. Using IF is ok here.

Hope this help
Thanks
VP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1397
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 290 [4] , given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2008, 09:58
4
KUDOS
rao_1857 wrote:
spriya wrote:
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would constitute a wasteful use of resources, on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone.

(A) on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone
(B) on the grounds of avoiding duplicated facilities alone
(C) solely in that duplicated facilities should be avoided
(D) while the duplication of facilities should be avoided
(E) if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoided

I dont understand the OA at all
share explanations

IMO E. "If" is ok here because its a different clause.

OA is (E) but i still wonder whats wrong with (B) can someoine explain this funda[/quote]

The way I approached this is that you have a conditional uncertainity in 1st clause "would" which depends of sth that "should happen". When ever you have uncertain words (may, might, should, would, can , could), always make sure that the answer choice you are choosing is not distorting the meaning by make sth 'hypothetical' to 'actual'.

After this we are left with C, D and E. C and D is again not a clear contruction.

Again: 'IF' and 'would' SHOULD not come in same clause (if they are scratch that answer choice). But it is OK to have 'em in different clause. Also if you take a close look, this is a typical IF...then condition scentence. Using IF is ok here.

Hope this help
Thanks[/quote]

good explanation
Thank u
_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 326
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 293 [2] , given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2008, 11:42
2
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The way I approached this is that you have a conditional uncertainity in 1st clause "would" which depends of sth that "should happen". When ever you have uncertain words (may, might, should, would, can , could), always make sure that the answer choice you are choosing is not distorting the meaning by make sth 'hypothetical' to 'actual'.

After this we are left with C, D and E. C and D is again not a clear contruction.

Again: 'IF' and 'would' SHOULD not come in same clause (if they are scratch that answer choice). But it is OK to have 'em in different clause. Also if you take a close look, this is a typical IF...then condition scentence. Using IF is ok here.

Hope this help
Thanks[/quote]

Good explanation rao_1857. Kudos for you.
Director
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 658
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 111 [3] , given: 7

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2008, 21:54
3
KUDOS
x97agarwal wrote:
The way I approached this is that you have a conditional uncertainity in 1st clause "would" which depends of sth that "should happen". When ever you have uncertain words (may, might, should, would, can , could), always make sure that the answer choice you are choosing is not distorting the meaning by make sth 'hypothetical' to 'actual'.

After this we are left with C, D and E. C and D is again not a clear contruction.

Again: 'IF' and 'would' SHOULD not come in same clause (if they are scratch that answer choice). But it is OK to have 'em in different clause. Also if you take a close look, this is a typical IF...then condition scentence. Using IF is ok here.

Hope this help
Thanks

Good explanation rao_1857. Kudos for you.[/quote]

THANKS x97agarwal,

My first Kudo!

THANKS AGAIN!!!
Director
Joined: 31 Mar 2007
Posts: 585
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 64 [18] , given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2008, 22:52
18
KUDOS
8
This post was
BOOKMARKED
This is a typical subjunctive mood question.

The subjunctive mood is when you have a sentence that refers to an opinion, a wish, etc. Something to the contrary.

If you read a sentence and you get a feel for the subjunctive mood, always match an IF with a WOULD. Also if you see a were/if/would, boom, that's your answer. Classic subjunctive mood.

eg.

I would most definitely buy a Ferrari Enzo, if I were to accumulate enough cash.
Intern
Joined: 14 Oct 2008
Posts: 32
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2009, 10:15
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would constitute a wasteful use of resources, on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone.
(A) on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone
(B) on the grounds of avoiding duplicated facilities alone
(C) solely in that duplicated facilities should be avoided
(D) while the duplication of facilities should be avoided
(E) if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoided
Intern
Joined: 08 Apr 2008
Posts: 39
Location: India
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 123 [0], given: 1

Re: Building large new hospitals [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2009, 10:28
A not idiomatically correct
B simple clear and idiomatically correct
C & D can be deselected beacuse of "should" in the sentense which alter the meaning of OS
E If only because cannot be used.

IMO

B
Manager
Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Posts: 177
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 124 [0], given: 0

Re: Building large new hospitals [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2009, 16:12
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would constitute a wasteful use of resources, on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone.
(A) on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone
(B) on the grounds of avoiding duplicated facilities alone
(C) solely in that duplicated facilities should be avoided
(D) while the duplication of facilities should be avoided

(E) if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoided

B - out - grounds for is the idiom not grounds of
C/D out - does not fit with sentence.
A/E both are not right.

A - "avoidance" seems to be wrong.
E - if only because, "should".

Not sure between A/E.

source of question seems to be poor...and might be doing more harm than good..got to avoid looking at these
Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Posts: 97
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 95 [0], given: 0

Re: SC Building large new hospitals [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Mar 2009, 13:25
Hi all,

I would appreciate if someone can resolve my doubt:
Would the use of A/B make the clause after comma a "run-on" sentence

thanks.
_________________

"The highest result of education is tolerance."

Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 265
Location: nj
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 241 [0], given: 2

Re: SC Building large new hospitals [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2009, 13:48
IMO...A
"on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone." is modifying "a wasteful use of resources"

also A looks clearer than any other choice... on the basis of X alone. ( X = noun = avoidance of duplicated facilities)
Intern
Joined: 16 Mar 2008
Posts: 20
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: SC Building large new hospitals [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Apr 2009, 13:33
IMO B. Between A & B, 'avoidance' doesn't sound correct. B correctly uses avoiding. I don't think its a 'run on ' sentence because comma seperates the clauses.
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Posts: 497
Schools: Kellogg, MIT, Michigan, Berkeley, Marshall, Mellon
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 13

Re: SC Building large new hospitals [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Apr 2009, 11:26
Hi mates,

very tough!!

IMO B

"on the grounds of" is the right idiom

OA and Source?

Cheers
_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/johnlewis1980-s-profile-feedback-is-more-than-welcome-80538.html

I'm not linked to GMAT questions anymore, so, if you need something, please PM me

I'm already focused on my application package

My experience in my second attempt
http://gmatclub.com/forum/p544312#p544312
My experience in my third attempt
http://gmatclub.com/forum/630-q-47-v-28-engineer-non-native-speaker-my-experience-78215.html#p588275

Director
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 838
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 0

Re: SC Building large new hospitals [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Apr 2009, 21:47
OA is E

good explanation on the usage of the subjunctive mood previously discussed here

sc-tough-67332.html?highlight=building+large+new+hospitals
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Dec 2009
Posts: 362
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 375 [1] , given: 47

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2010, 11:21
1
KUDOS
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would constitute a wasteful use of resources, on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone.

(A) on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone
(B) on the grounds of avoiding duplicated facilities alone
(C) solely in that duplicated facilities should be avoided
(D) while the duplication of facilities should be avoided
(E) if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoided

IMO E.... as E gives the reason or support so as to why the Building large new hospitals would be be wasteful!

Something on the lines..... X would be useless, if ..Y is the condition!
For me A sounds too word with of abundance in it
B - ground of avoiding is not the right tense of verb to be used here
C & D - dont give the condition of the stand taken in the clause before
_________________

Cheers!
JT...........
If u like my post..... payback in Kudos!!

|For CR refer Powerscore CR Bible|For SC refer Manhattan SC Guide|

~~Better Burn Out... Than Fade Away~~

Re: SC - tough   [#permalink] 28 Jan 2010, 11:21

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 53 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would 5 26 Jun 2008, 01:18
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would 3 16 Jun 2008, 05:35
1 Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would 10 07 Oct 2007, 17:34
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would 3 06 Jul 2007, 10:50
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would 4 18 May 2007, 02:05
Display posts from previous: Sort by